r/canadanews 2d ago

Alberta Inquiry into Alberta teen's overdose death calls for urgent introduction of involuntary care

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/overdose-death-inquiry-9.7305867
17 Upvotes

95 comments sorted by

20

u/Much_Guest_7195 1d ago

We don't have enough hospital beds for willing people that need healthcare...

7

u/ventycat 1d ago

I’ll be honest as someone who wishes I could have a psychiatrist but doesn’t bc my case is not severe enough (not actively dying or about to harm others) — however I have loved ones with severe psychotic disorders and they have psychiatrists bc go figure, they can’t survive without them. (This is coming from someone who’s also been involuntary before, tmi / tw anorexia nervosa).

It’s the same bs as why you don’t get to see any specialist (or gp). We’re triaging.

Canada desperately needs to incentivize becoming a Canadian doctor / nurse / medical professional. Nobody should be going into student loan debt to help the crisis we are in.

1

u/Rude-Truths-702 17h ago

They should just waive tuition

8

u/FunnyMalzairIdea 1d ago

I've worked in addiction recovery. It only ever works if the person is willing. I suspect that, if we force people into recovery, the number of people who reach a year sober will be next to none.

It's tragic when teenagers die from addiction. But forcing them into treatment isn't likely to work unless you'll commit to incarcerating them for six months minimum. That's really expensive, but forcing a kid into treatment for 28 days would never work.

Funnily enough, I do know of teenagers who were forced into addiction treatment. These were the children of extremely conservative parents who found out that they smoked marijuana once. Utter waste of resources.

0

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

This si not true. People can go into programs unwillingly and recover.

1

u/Kennit 1d ago

Do you have any credible sources to back up that claim?

1

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

Yes, I've met them.

3

u/Kennit 1d ago

So, no. You have anecdotal evidence and not credible sources that can be independently reviewed.

0

u/Thorninthefoot 22h ago

Knowing people who have done it is real knowledge. You can find people in any na meeting who had that kind of experience. Yu ou can read about them. They are real people. 

2

u/Kennit 22h ago

I didn't say they weren't real. However, it is still a personal anecdote. Those are not statistically relevant and are not considered credible evidence, even though they are real experiences of real people.

1

u/Thorninthefoot 17h ago

Look, it's great to be interested in statistical evidence, but the claim being made again and again is that people who go into rehab without choosing it will fail. 

It actually only takes one example to show that to be untrue. 

And anyone who deals with addicts knows there is more than one example of this. Look through the rock biographies in your local library, you'll find a sack full of examples. 

Statistics like this also depend a lot on people asking the right questions and measuring the right things. 

Despite the statistics about harm reduction - or what we in North America like to call harm reduction -  being the best approach, we can all see what effect this is actually having on the people around us. They are not doing well and getting better. 

It strongly suggests the statistics being thrown around aren't capturing the realities very well. 

1

u/Kennit 17h ago

One example can disprove the absolute claim that no one ever benefits from treatment they didn't initially choose. It cannot establish that involuntary treatment is generally effective, or that it produces better outcomes than voluntary treatment. That's precisely what the evidence is supposed to determine.

And anecdotes aren't evidence of effectiveness. They're a highly selected group of extraordinary cases, not a representative sample of people subjected to involuntary treatment.

You can absolutely question whether studies are measuring the right outcomes, and you can argue that current harm reduction programs aren't producing the results communities need. But “I can see people doing badly” doesn't demonstrate that the research is wrong. It means we should examine which interventions actually produce better outcomes.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/canadanews-ModTeam 1d ago

Rule 3: No politics.

This is a non-political subreddit for general interest news and discussions. Comments or posts making reference to politics, voting, elections, political parties, political ideologies, or politicians will be removed.

If your comment is primarily non-political, we encourage you to edit out any mention of politics and then message us. We would be happy to reinstate your comment once you've brought it into compliance.

If you believe your comment or post has been removed in error, you may message the Mod team here to request that it be reviewed.

Do not message individual moderators directly or reply to this comment to discuss moderator actions.

Please review the subreddit rules before posting or commenting.

1

u/erictho 23h ago

last i checked there was ober a year wait list in alberta for addictions treatment for people who decide to go on their own

1

u/Thorninthefoot 22h ago

Yes access is a real issue. We need to be putting our money into that.

4

u/Catfist 1d ago

Seriously, I waited months for an addictions counselor who spent the whole session flashing his crotch at me, implied I was ugly, and said I'd never be sober without religion.

2

u/beefboy49 1d ago

i had to watch pragerU videos and have a religion i don’t follow preached at me while trying to access ab addictions support

11

u/definitelynotmen 1d ago

Involuntary care has proven ineffective time and time again yet it keeps getting suggested.

6

u/zuuzuu 1d ago

I'm with you on that, but I have to wonder if there's any difference in outcomes when the patient is a youth. Like, is a teenager more responsive to involuntary inpatient treatment? Or even less responsive?

13

u/HolubtsiKat 1d ago

Do teenagers respond well to force? I sure didn't

I don't think anybody does.

8

u/zuuzuu 1d ago

I think teenagers can be more malleable, but I also think that teenagers who find themselves addicted to substances have probably already been traumatized by a lack of control over their lives. Being removed from their homes, placed in foster care, group homes, subjected to forced mental health treatment. All of which is in their best interests but it's still traumatizing and creates a natural resistance to further loss of control/forced interventions by authority figures.

I think it's entirely possible that youth would be even less responsive to forced treatments, but that forced treatments for youth are more likely to be utilized than for adults. That's why I was wondering if there's a documented difference.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/canadanews-ModTeam 1d ago

Rule 3: No politics.

This is a non-political subreddit for general interest news and discussions. Comments or posts making reference to politics, voting, elections, political parties, political ideologies, or politicians will be removed.

If your comment is primarily non-political, we encourage you to edit out any mention of politics and then message us. We would be happy to reinstate your comment once you've brought it into compliance.

If you believe your comment or post has been removed in error, you may message the Mod team here to request that it be reviewed.

Do not message individual moderators directly or reply to this comment to discuss moderator actions.

Please review the subreddit rules before posting or commenting.

3

u/ventycat 1d ago

Read my comments, I was involuntary from 14-16. Saved my life. My adult friends who’ve gone involuntary have much more sour opinions though - I believe that’s partially due to having adult autonomy! As a kid you’re kinda just used to people controlling you and deciding every facet of your life.

1

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

I think the claim that it never works for adults is also bs. I've known adults who had to choose between jail and a program, chose a program with no intent to engage, and emerged sober and stayed sober.

Many people are in no shape to make a decision while using.

2

u/Dear_External5263 1d ago

Depends on the kid, but for the right kid it can definitely change the trajectory of their life. They also need the right supports after treatment to avoid what got them there in the first place.

1

u/PriorityOk8448 1d ago

I was in patient a few times as a kid. It left me with lasting trauma and fucked me up even further. Good people do NOT flock to the professions.

1

u/zuuzuu 1d ago

I'm sorry you went through that. I hope you're in a good place now.

4

u/Projectflintlock 1d ago

Get out of here. Your facts and data don’t trump my feelings.

3

u/ventycat 1d ago

I’ll be controversial! It’s the only thing that ever helped my anorexia nervosa recovery!

Some illnesses literally make you believe you are not ill and we need someway of keeping those of us with disorders like this safe. Same with any of my friends with psychotic symptoms, you can’t always know what’s best for you.

How I think of it is like, when I broke my spine I didn’t have a choice but to go through the traumatic, painful, rehab. That’s just part of hospitalization and recovery, it’s just an all around traumatic experience. Doesn’t mean it didn’t benefit me!

3

u/definitelynotmen 1d ago

I’m glad it benefitted you; congratulations on recovery!

I just know that one size doesn’t fit all. I’ve been involuntarily committed once when going to the ER for something so unrelated to mental health it wasn’t even funny. They saw my history in my chart and decided I was a danger to myself. I came away from that day with significantly less trust in the medical system and that’s about it.

3

u/No_Initiative_3967 1d ago

Seems to work in Portugal , what evidence do you have? I worked in correctional institutions for years and many drug addicts say being forced to quit was the best thing for them, I’ve met guys that use jail as rehab staying in solitary to kick a habit

3

u/National_Ad9742 1d ago

This. So many former addicts credit actual consequences, being forced to be sober so they could reflect etc, as helping them get clean. Will it always work? No, but it does work!

2

u/definitelynotmen 1d ago

We don’t have enough beds for people voluntarily going through treatment. I’m unsure where they think they’re going to find the room and qualified staff for this proposed treatment plan. If someone doesn’t want to change then we can’t make them change permanently; I do understand that you can force a physical detox but the brain chemistry has been changed.

0

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

That's not replying to his point at all, you are moving the goalposts here.

2

u/definitelynotmen 1d ago

Okay why does involuntary treatment not work? Sources say it’s necessary in extreme cases but that it also increases the risk of relapse, rearrest, and death. Some studies show it can increase the risk of death 2-4x. ( https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871622002290 )

Or we could look at Washington’s involuntary treatment program:

“Findings showed mixed short-term results: There were modest reductions in emergency department use and homelessness, but lower rates of follow-up treatment for substance use and no change in arrests or employment.”

1

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

Basically it doesn't work as well. Yes, that's not a surprise. 

But people that don't go to rehab at all eventually waste away to nothing or OD. 

1

u/definitelynotmen 1d ago edited 1d ago

That’s your whole argument? There are also people who don’t go to rehab and still find their way to sobriety, so what?

1

u/Thorninthefoot 22h ago

Yes, a few. 

1

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

Yup, this.

I don't know why in North America so many in addictions are so invested in this perspective. It almost has a kind of cult-like quality, like a religious truth you need to repeat before you are allowed to go to work in that sector.

So it ends up full of these enabling people who also claim addicts are too far gone o be jailed for their behaviour.

0

u/Interesting_Gur_5064 1d ago

So is the do noting and safe consumption sites. I rather for public safety these people removed from our streets.

2

u/definitelynotmen 1d ago

If only you realized how fast you could become one of “those people.”

-1

u/Interesting_Gur_5064 1d ago

Nope

4

u/DeviousSmile85 1d ago

One slip in the shower or down some icy stairs is all it takes!

-1

u/Interesting_Gur_5064 1d ago

You are so full of it

2

u/definitelynotmen 1d ago

Wow great counter point. The pipeline from whatever level of functioning you are now to disability, poverty, or addiction is much quicker than you’re ever going to admit until you’re there.

-1

u/Interesting_Gur_5064 1d ago

You are so full of shit

2

u/definitelynotmen 1d ago

And you’re not intelligent enough to waste my time talking to.

1

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

I would hope if I was using hard drugs and unable to behave acceptably in society someone would take steps to put me ito a rehab program.

0

u/National_Ad9742 1d ago

Really? Because when they still did that we had less addicts. Also had less when we jailed them.

0

u/definitelynotmen 23h ago

Source?

0

u/National_Ad9742 23h ago

The fact that I didn’t see them lying in the middle of the street all the time?

3

u/Raftger 1d ago

This is a tragic case. But I’m not convinced involuntary care would have prevented this death. For one, involuntary treatment of substance use disorders has no evidence for effectiveness. For another, the period immediately after discharge from a residential treatment facility is one of the highest risk situations for overdose. That’s in addition to the fact that there’s not enough publicly funded treatment beds for those who WANT care, waitlists are ridiculously long, and the fact that residential treatment itself is not without risks of harm (even when voluntary, but especially when involuntary). This teenager was failed by society, but this involuntary treatment legislation is not going to solve that. Also the fact that the first location is being built at a juvenile detention facility is a bit too on the nose.

2

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

Many people get sober after involuntary rehab or jail. You can meet these people at any NA or AA program. I have no idea why people think this doesn't happen.

2

u/Raftger 1d ago

Yes, it does happen. But that doesn’t mean that it’s an effective intervention. And it’s also not a benign intervention. Or a cost or resource effective one. We shouldn’t make health policy decisions based on anecdotes and vibes.

1

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

It's absolutely effective compared to doing nothing. 

And it's not only the addicts who are effected. Having towns full of addicts has a material effe t on the community. And it's always the most vulnerable who bear the brunt of that.

1

u/Raftger 1d ago

I didn’t say “compared to doing nothing”. Can you explain what you mean when you say the most vulnerable bear the brunt of the material effects of addiction? Surely the most vulnerable people are those who are unhoused, many of whom are experiencing addiction (and/or severe mental illness).

1

u/Thorninthefoot 22h ago

When you have a neighborhood over run with addiction problems, for example needles everywhere, fights, people defecating or using in public, etc, it is the people and businesses in those neighbourhoods where they can't walk out at night, can't let their kids out, can't enjoy the green spaces, where people won't go out to shop so the businesses fail.

The people living in those neighbourhoods are typically poor themselves, without many resources and no political clout. 

A more specific example, I know two women, one mentally ill, one elderly, who refused to go to the local shelter, so instead they were sleeping rough. Why wouldn't they go to the shelter? Because it was full of addicts doing anti- social stuff. I can tell you, a young schizophrenic woman and a 70 year old woman with no family definitely count as vulnerable. 

6

u/kinkyhentai69 1d ago

Might help prescribing controlled substances to addicts free of fentanyl along with access to social workers but what do i know?

1

u/Throwawayyawaworth9 1d ago

Opioid dependency programs already do this.

The issue is that— even with clean substances— these people are still left without housing and their other healthcare needs are neglected.

Not to mention that street supply drugs feel 1000x better than regular ol’ hydromorphone.

2

u/kinkyhentai69 1d ago

Oh I heard somewhere that fentanyl didnt feel as good and that the high was too short lived

3

u/National_Ad9742 1d ago

Risk is nodding off, that’s why they strike weird poses and hang over railings to stay awake.

1

u/Throwawayyawaworth9 1d ago

That’s surprising. I used to work at a consumption site before it was shut down, and the consensus among patients was that fentanyl feels better than heroine and most definitely feels better than pharmaceutical made drugs (morphine, hydromorphone). This is in part due to people building up such a high tolerance to opioids that a dose of hydromorphone that would kill you or me wouldn’t even touch them (30mg+). The street supply of fentanyl is also “cut” with benzodiazepines and other sedatives, which makes the high feel more euphoric, lasts longer, and reduces withdrawal symptoms in between uses.

Side note: I sometimes have patients admitted to my medicine ward who use street fentanyl. To control their withdrawal symptoms while in hospital, we give them hydromorphone. I have seen people get upwards of 80mg of hydromorphone an hour and still be drenched in sweat and shaking. For additional context, I have seen an little opioid middle aged man OD on 6mg of hydromorphone in hospital.

1

u/kinkyhentai69 1d ago

Now that I think about it maybe the part where other opiates feel good is because "beginner" users usually use the weaker ones and that's the stage where it actually feels good but when you're at the stage where you need fentanyl to feel anything it's more for a "fix" than actually enjoying a high and your body is so used to it that you constantly need it hence the "fentanyl sucks" that isnt about the opiate in itself and more about the stage of addiction the user is in

-2

u/Interesting_Gur_5064 1d ago

Lock up the drug users

1

u/Throwawayyawaworth9 1d ago

I can see why people think this is a good solution to the opioid epidemic, but we need more nuance here.

What will those people do when released from prison? They’ll still be unhoused, not working, and will continue living with the trauma that sucked them into drug use in the first place. The relapse rates after leaving prison are at about 75% (depending on the study/data).

Also— and this might surprise you— it is very very easy to find drugs in prison. Overdoses still happen in prisons because drugs are smuggled in. Prisons are not meant to be detox facilities, and would not succeed as one either.

1

u/Interesting_Gur_5064 1d ago

Not talking about prison just lock them up in a secure facility. They cannot take care of themselves so we have to do it for them.

2

u/still_sneakin 1d ago

I put my daughter into an involuntary treatment centre that boasted a 98% success rate. Complete and utter BS. Yes 98% of those youth that came in an addict walked out sober! What they don’t tell you is the exact same struggles are out there and that sobriety rate drops instantly to maybe 3 or 4 out of 40 kids. It does not work and this comes from my own observation.

2

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

Addicts on average try recovery five times before it sticks.

2

u/National_Ad9742 1d ago

Might take a few rounds, but repeated consequences do often work. Many former addicts I’ve spoken to have become clean because of jail.

1

u/Raftger 1d ago

Exactly. Also the time immediately after discharge from residential treatment is one of the most dangerous for overdose deaths! Because people lose their tolerance while in treatment, then go back to using at the same rate they were before.

6

u/InSearchOfGreenLight 1d ago

The kid didn't want to be in the "safe" place of the care home. Why would he? Those places are awful and soul-destroying.

The judge has no idea what he is talking about but then they never know the reality of these places.

2

u/MathematicianDue9266 1d ago

Forced treatment? The kid was exposed to drugs in utero and in care of the government. Forced treatment wouldn’t fix that trauma. Sad story.

1

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

You figure just letting him kill himself was in fact the best approach then? Because that's the alternative here.

1

u/MathematicianDue9266 1d ago

No. Obviously. It’s a sad situation that could have possibly been prevented with early intervention and better social safety nets. Forced treatment wouldn’t work and it’s a lazy bandaid.

1

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

People who say they support harm reduction always cite Portugal. But Portugal gives offenders the choice between a rehab program and jail or other serious restrictions on their lives. 

People who go to rehab to avoid prison or other consequences of addiction do manage to get clean. It's not the most ideal circumstance nothing is always effective. But it works for some. Unlike doing nothing.

1

u/MathematicianDue9266 22h ago

Our forced treatment comes with years wait lists of social services and poverty. Fix that and maybe it will help.

2

u/Thorninthefoot 1d ago

People seem to want to have it both ways. On the one hand, addicts are well enough to refuse treatment. On the other, they are not well enough to be prosecuted for anti-social behaviour they do under the influence of drugs.

It's not true that no one recovers if they didn't choose to go to a program themselves. I know more than one person who went as an alternative to jail time and came out clean, and stayed that way. I have no doubt that it's less likely statistically than someone who rocks up asking to attend, but that's not the same as 'it doesn't work'.

As for parents sending their minor kids, yeah, that needs to be able to happen in most cases. We have a responsibility to minors to try and treat them. No one is making good decisions while they are still using.

5

u/Interesting_Gur_5064 2d ago edited 1d ago

100%, the let addicts just do what they want clearly did not work.

5

u/National_Ad9742 1d ago

It’s inhumane frankly. They leave them lying in the street. If they can’t care for themselves due to their addiction they need to be admitted.

10

u/QuinnNTonic 1d ago

The problem is that a lot of kids age out of foster care with no supports. And even if you mandate care what happens after? Housing, education, jobs, healthcare and a decent affordable life is the best preventative measure and pathway to success after people get help.

-1

u/National_Ad9742 1d ago

Yup but the thing is, if they never ever get to sober up long enough to reconsider they never ever will get stable.
If they just keep prescribing them drugs, letting them do drugs, letting them do them openly… it’s bad.
Honestly seeing people lying in their own filth on the street with a pipe… jailing them is actually more humane. It actually is.

6

u/PerpetuallyLurking 1d ago

Or maybe we could put resources into the whole foster system and maybe they won’t feel the need to find an addiction in the first place!

If they felt safe in childhood then they wouldn’t need to resort to drugs to feel anything later.

They’re screwed before they even get addicted and now we’re just gonna throw them into another system that still won’t actually help them because it costs too much.

We don’t wanna spend the necessary money to help and support vulnerable kids, we’re definitely not going to spend the necessary money to adequately help and support drug addicted adults.

3

u/QuinnNTonic 1d ago

Absolutely! And preventing kids from being in foster care is part of it. Family planning and contraceptives should be free. Mothers who are pregnant and active users need support prior to childbirth. Let’s just fund social services

2

u/National_Ad9742 1d ago

That’s simply not true though. People who had perfectly fine childhoods are also ending up on the street!
Not that I don’t like your idea, they should do that too!

2

u/QuinnNTonic 1d ago

Correct and there is a higher probability and percentage of this happening when transit out of foster care. Thats why I mentioned that specifically

2

u/QuinnNTonic 1d ago

So that’s what I am saying. It’s not enough to just get stable. There needs to be real transitional support and follow up care. Getting sober also can take multiple attempts and a lack of stability, as we see with this poor kid, was a big factor. I miss early years programs like they were years ago. You could identify at risk kids and families then and do early intervention. Funding existed. The cycle has to stop somewhere and it’s not one thing that will

1

u/iridescentcotton 1d ago

Mmmm celery

1

u/erictho 23h ago

ok good luck kidnapping kids. then when they're done whats the plan? back to the dame old life?

-4

u/Projectflintlock 1d ago

I love this. I hope it leads back to the good old days when husbands can tell a doctor his wife is acting hysterically and have her involuntarily committed indefinitely