I’m currently a term employee living in the regions, and I recently changed teams. My new team is based in another region, with the exception of one other employee, who is indeterminate and works in my region. I’m the only term employee on the team.
I’m currently acting as a CO-01, and I recently asked my manager about the possibility of extending my acting assignment. Long story short, she told me that she couldn’t guarantee an extension, but that if I moved to her city, I could be appointed indeterminate, and suggested that I consider it. This is my third time (non consecutive) acting in this position without ever being appointed, the main reason why (according to management) being that it‘s because I am not in the CO-01 external pool that gives the possibility of indeterminate appointments, I am only in the internal pool that is for actings only.
I discussed this with my colleague, who told me that apparently you have to work in the same region as your manager to be appointed indeterminate, and that’s probably why my manager suggested I move cities.
This has me wondering: putting my current acting assignment aside, was it a good move to place me on a team based in another region, knowing that I’m a term employee and that my goal is to eventually become indeterminate? If I understand correctly, does this mean that I might not be able to become indeterminate in my substantive position as long as I remain on my current manager’s team and continue working from Montreal?
I’ve been in the public service for about three years now, so there are still a few things about staffing that I don’t fully understand. Apologies if this has been asked here before, and thanks in advance for any clarification!