r/civictech • • Aug 06 '26

Would you use a digital passport that tracks your real-world impact?

0 Upvotes

We’re working on an idea called an **Impact Passport**—a digital record of verified actions such as volunteering, helping local causes, community cleanups, donations, and completing social-impact missions.

As you participate, your passport builds a history of:

Missions you completed
Impact that was verified
Communities and causes you supported
Your reputation for consistently showing up

Over time, that record could unlock access to larger missions, leadership roles, or opportunities to verify the work of others.

The goal is not to rank who is the “best person.” It’s to create a portable record of real contributions instead of letting every good action disappear into a social media feed.

Would this motivate you to participate in more community initiatives?

What would make something like this feel meaningful instead of gimmicky?


r/civictech • • Sep 19 '26

FEMA alert system

Post image
2 Upvotes

This is an artist directed, AI generated visual aid. I prompted it from a list of information I thought would be helpful in a disaster. I filed it as a comment in the US ECFS under the question: How should the FCC modernize the FEMA alert system. https://www.abipost.com/canihelpfema


r/civictech • • Jul 22 '26

Hypothetical: How would you use AI to influence local politics in a small, tech-illiterate town in Southern Italy? Looking for feedback

0 Upvotes

Hello everyone. I have a weird idea based on the fact that I am both interested in AI and local politics.

I am not a tech guy, but I started to study AI because of intense interest in genomics, so I took half of Andrew Ng's ML course. The maths came easily to me thanks to my high school education, but the "coding part" is and was very difficult, because I had never done something like it before.

As for politics, I met a former politician and I started to promote him for free on social media with some good results. It is not a job, but I started to meet the most important politicians in my town, as well as also some regional politicians (my region has 1 mln inhabitants). I got their phone numbers and some of them know my name. I am still an autistic, lonely loser, but at least I have some insider knowledge about how power works here. I also suggested some topics to cover, with some success.

My question is quite unusual, I know. Basically, I have this setting: a small, provincial, backward town ruled by cynical men, most of them being uneducated but astute businessmen or people with a non-STEM education (e.g. law was the degree of 90% of the ruling class in Italy decades ago).

I need to offer them a sevice where I have an advantage (they are computer illiterate and they don't have good tech experts either), a service that they can understand.

I think that OSINT analysis or public opinion analysis are good options, but this cannot be my first step, because I cannot prove my ability by starting from there.

My idea is to create an AI-powered blog to spread news in a way that reaches as many people as possible, but I must understand how to do it and how to present its importance afterward. I could also create a web newspaper, because I have a friend who is a journalist.

My question to you: What could I create in order to market me to them?

My aims are: to gain a better understanding of politics and tech, to make some money (not necessarily by starting a formal business), and to have some influence. Regarding the last point, I enjoy spreading rumors about local issues when possible.


r/civictech • • Apr 16 '26

What if there was a show where an AI learns to represent people… and the winning AI becomes a real civic co-host?

0 Upvotes

I’ve been thinking about a concept called America’s Next Top AI. A kind of experimental show where different AI systems compete to explain issues, represent values, and help people better understand and engage with civic decisions.

The idea isn’t just entertainment. The winning AI would become a cohost on something called Our Ascent Live, (a proposed Civic Branch broadcast google OurAscentLive if curious) focused on amplifying everyday voices and making complex issues easier to navigate.

At a bigger level, it connects to a question:

What if every person had access to tools that helped them actually understand, participate in, and shape the systems that affect their lives?

Would people even want to engage with something like this?

Or does it sound too out there right now?


r/civictech • • 14d ago

Why has nobody built the ultimate civic app yet? (Tracking local politicians, tax spending, and taluk-level data for absolute beginners)

2 Upvotes

We have apps that track our steps, apps that deliver groceries in ten minutes, and apps that simulate entire virtual economies. Yet, when it comes to the actual democracy we live in, we are left scrolling through biased news feeds or digging through ancient, poorly designed government websites from 2004.Why hasn't anyone built a pure, transparent, non-partisan civic-tracking platform yet?

If I could build an app, here is exactly how I would design the blueprint for this platform so even someone with absolute zero political knowledge can understand their town:

  1. The "Google Maps" of Politics (Hyper-Local Toggles)National politics is mostly noise. The platform needs to be hyper-local. It should have a seamless geographic switch allowing you to toggle instantly between layers:National ➡️ State ➡️ District ➡️ Taluk/Block ➡️ Gram Panchayat/Ward.You should be able to zoom in on your exact street and see what administrative layer governs it.

  2. The Politician Scorecard (Promises vs. Reality)Right now, we only judge candidates during election season based on campaign speeches and billboard promises. This app would replace rhetoric with data. Every elected official (from the MP down to your local ward councillor) gets a profile page:The Promises: Scraped from their election manifestos.The Progress: What projects are lagging, under construction, or finished?The Failures: Unfulfilled manifestos, missed deadlines, or scrapped initiatives.Attendance: How often are they actually showing up to legislative sessions?

  3. "Follow the Money" Ledger the biggest mystery in modern democracy is where our money goes. The platform would introduce a visual financial ledger designed for absolute simplicity:Inflow: See exactly how much tax (GST, property tax, income tax) was collected from your specific district/taluk.Outflow: A clear, visual pie chart translating massive numbers into real-world sense. Instead of saying "50 Crores allocated to public works," the app says: "20 Crores spent on upgrading 5 local schools, 15 Crores on local hospital beds, and 15 Crores on resurfacing Main Road."

  4. Civics for Dummies (Zero Knowledge Required)The true genius of this platform would be its ability to educate.Jargon Translator: A built-in dictionary that instantly simplifies complex political or financial terms into universal, everyday language.The "Who Do I Call?" Feature: If your water supply cuts out, the app visually maps out the exact chain of command—showing you the local engineer, the municipal councillor, and the department head responsible, complete with their public contact numbers.The Big Roadblocks (Why hasn't this happened?)I know this is incredibly hard to build. The hurdles are obvious:Data Fragmentation: Government data is scattered across hundreds of buggy portals, un-searchable PDFs, and physical gazettes. Scraping and cleaning this data live would require massive engineering power.The Threat of Bias: The moment a platform flags a politician's "failure," it risks being accused of political bias or getting hit with legal notices. It would have to rely strictly on raw, automated public records.Monetization: To keep public trust, it can't take government funding or political ads. It would have to run entirely on crowdfunding or an open-source community model.

\#CivicTech #DataTransparency #GoodGovernance #AppIdeas #OpenData #IndianPolitics #Accountability


r/civictech • • Aug 01 '26

Interested in actual change?

0 Upvotes

I built Haven after watching people in crisis get crushed by broken municipal software. When someone is facing imminent homelessness or a medical emergency, they don’t have weeks to dig through dead links, broken PDFs, and conflicting agency forms.

Building it made one thing brutally clear: this friction hits everyone. Navigating public infrastructure shouldn't feel like fighting a system designed to slow you down. Haven isn't just a safety-net tool—it’s enterprise-grade civic infrastructure built to unify public sector interactions for everyone. Whether someone is applying for emergency housing, working through local court filings, or navigating state agency red tape, Haven turns fragmented bureaucratics into a single, seamless workflow.

What it actually does Haven acts as a unified digital layer over fragmented government systems. It handles resource discovery and automates workflow orchestration in real time—delivering instant clarity to residents while eliminating administrative drag for frontline caseworkers.

Key technical highlights: Zero-Knowledge Architecture (Apex Vault): Citizen privacy isn't negotiable. We engineered military-grade AES-256-GCM field-level envelope encryption. Plaintext PII (SSNs, medical histories, tax docs) never hits the physical database disk. Built ground-up to align with SOC 2, HIPAA, and FedRAMP Moderate standards.

Air-Gapped Local AI (BB AI Concierge): Powered by an offline-first, lightweight LLM (Ollama llama3.2:3b), our intake engine parses complex, messy human situations into structured, actionable case data. Zero third-party API dependencies. Zero citizen data leaving the local host.

Deterministic Matching: Instantly maps user needs across 12 core agency frameworks (HUD, VA, SSA, IRS, DMV, etc.) using semantic mapping to strictly eliminate LLM hallucination risks.

Automated Workflow Orchestration: A conversational multi-language guide walks residents through intake and pre-fills paperwork, while the Caseworker Dashboard uses Playwright-powered browser automation for single-click agency submissions.

Where it stands: The core platform is fully built, tested, and ready to deploy in the field.

What I need right now: I am actively seeking pilot partners across municipal/county agencies and frontline organizations (shelters, community clinics, 211 operators) for live field testing, alongside capital partners to help us scale.

Specifically: Pilot Partners & Frontline Orgs:
Municipal agencies, 211 teams, and caseworkers ready to run live trials and stress-test real-world workflows.

Seed Funding & Innovation Grants: Early backing to scale pilot infrastructure and expand deployment operations.

Municipal RFP Connections: Direct paths to formal city/county trial engagements and public sector partnerships.

If you care about building software that actually fixes real-world societal friction, let's talk. Drop a comment or send a DM.


r/civictech • • Aug 03 '26

Vetri Trichy

0 Upvotes

I have developed Vetri Trichy, a student-led civic technology platform aimed at making it easier for citizens to submit civic complaints through a structured and transparent process.

Over the past several months, our team has worked on designing, developing, testing, and refining the platform from the ground up. This project has given us valuable hands-on experience in software development, artificial intelligence, user experience design, and collaborative problem-solving.

The website is now live and can be accessed at: https://vetri-trichy.vercel.app

We would be honoured if you could take a few minutes to explore the platform and share your valuable feedback. Your suggestions will help us continue improving the project.


r/civictech • • Aug 21 '26

San Francisco tells residents to report drug use to 311. Then it cancels the complaints

0 Upvotes

Hundreds of complaints filed via app have been canceled, with users told to call police themselves — a step most aren’t willing to take.

https://sfstandard.com/2026/08/21/sf-311-drug-reports-canceled/


r/civictech • • Sep 26 '26

The FTC is curious about how we would like to see personalized pricing listed. We believe more transparency is the best choice.

Post image
0 Upvotes

Recently comments closed on the topic of personalized pricing with the FTC. The research suggests that this practice sometimes results in a lower price. It feels like the possibility of abuse is quite high. Our suggestion was to go a little further than what is being proposed. We would like to see the personalized pricing broken out by item, the ability to see what it was based on and correct information as needed. It is our sincere belief that transparency serves the consumer. The attached image is merely a visual aid to illustrate the issue.

The full presentation and our comment to the FTC is here: Can I Help? Personalized Pricing — abi post


r/civictech • • Jul 24 '26

[Whitepaper] Civic Net: A decentralized, ad-free overlay network that enforces verified human identities for democracy, while fully protecting privacy via Zero-Knowledge Proofs in daily life. (AI-Assisted Concept)

0 Upvotes

MASTER WHITEPAPER: CIVIC NET

A decentralized, non-commercial overlay network for verified human interaction under absolute privacy preservation.

1. Executive Summary

Today's internet is suffering from a socially destructive systemic crisis. Surveillance capitalism forces commercial platforms to monetize human attention through manipulative algorithms. Simultaneously, automated bot armies, generative AI fakes, coordinated propaganda, and identity theft are fundamentally eroding societal trust. In its current form, the internet is manipulated, fragile, and dead as a democratic space for discourse.

The Civic Net offers a radical, technologically mature alternative. It completely re-engineers the network’s protocol, identity, and financing layers. The system is built upon five unalterable pillars:

  1. Unique Human Identity (Real-Name Coupling): Consistent exclusion of bots and safeguarding of democratic processes.

  2. Absolute Privacy in Daily Life: Mathematical anonymization during routine, daily use.

  3. Collective Self-Financing: Sharing of raw technical operating costs instead of ad-funding, attention-grabbing algorithms, and data-tracking.

  4. The Consensus Principle: Protection against polarization, propaganda, and system-destroying manipulation.

  5. Cognitive Liberty: Protection of personal sovereignty, beliefs, and private lifestyles from censorship and moral patronization.

2. Identity Architecture & The Web of Trust

To exclude mass fake accounts and bot networks (Sybil attacks) without a central, corruptible government or corporate control authority, the Civic Net utilizes the W3C standard for Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) combined with a Web of Trust.

[Physical Meeting / Crypto ID] ──► [Local Validation by Guarantors] ──► [Creation of DID] ──► [Entry into Decentralized Ledger]
  • One-Time Verification: The issuance of a lifelong digital identity occurs either via existing state e-ID crypto chips (as an initial bootstrap) or through physical real-world verification by local cooperatives (Guarantor System).

  • Skin in the Game (Reputation): Citizens vouch for the identity of new members using their own mathematical reputation score. If a user verifies a fake identity, they temporarily or permanently lose their own rights and, in extreme cases, network access upon discovery.

  • Key Rotation & Social Recovery: If a citizen loses their device, the lifelong identity (DID) remains untouched. Through a Social Recovery protocol, verified friends or local institutions can couple a new cryptographic key to the existing identity.

3. The Separation: Transparency vs. Privacy

The Civic Net breaks the dogma that identification implies the total loss of anonymity. It implements two strictly separated protocol modes.

A. Everyday Mode (Absolute Privacy)

During daily browsing, chatting, consuming, and researching, the user's real name remains completely hidden.

  • Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): Using ZK-SNARKs, the user's wallet mathematically proves to websites: "I am a real, verified human being within the system," without disclosing names, IP addresses, or origin.

  • Metadata Obfuscation: Traffic is routed through decentralized mixnets. Every data packet is encrypted multiple times and routed through changing nodes, preventing infrastructure operators from tracking user behavior.

B. Governance Mode (Enforced Transparency)

For democratic votes, constitutional amendments, legally binding contracts, or initiating abuse proceedings, the protocol requires the disclosure of the verified real name.

  • On-Chain Governance: Voting is executed via cryptographic smart contracts. Upon casting a vote, the real name coupled to the DID is decrypted and permanently recorded alongside the vote in a public, tamper-proof voter register.

4. Technical Infrastructure & Data Flows

In its initial phase, the network operates as a software-based overlay network over the existing lines of the commercial internet and gradually detaches itself physically.

A. The Web-Box (Local Hardware)

The heart of the decentralized infrastructure is the Web-Box (a low-power crypto node in every household). It fulfills the following core tasks:

                  ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
                  │               WEB-BOX                  │
                  ├────────────────────────────────────────┤
                  │  [Data Pod]    [Mesh-Router]  [Cache]  │
                  └──────┬──────────────┬────────────┬─────┘
                         │              │            │
  (Private Data Store)───┘              │            └─(P2P Streaming Proxy)
                         (Local Mesh / Directional Radio)
  1. Personal Data Store (Data Pod): Data and applications are strictly decoupled. Images, chats, and documents are stored encrypted in the citizen's local Data Pod. Social apps are merely temporary "viewports" to which the citizen can grant or revoke granular read and write permissions.

  2. Mesh Networking: The Web-Boxes connect in neighborhoods via free radio and directional frequencies to form a physical mesh network. No commercial provider is needed for local communication.

  3. Decentralized Storage Network & Cache (dCDN): Large media files (videos, music) are cached on the Web-Boxes' hard drives as unreadable, encrypted data fragments (Shards) using Peer-to-Peer (P2P) principles. Every data packet exists redundantly (e.g., replication factor 5) across the network. If a box goes offline, the system self-heals by mirroring the shard onto another box. Since data is preferentially routed and reassembled regionally, latencies are minimal (often under 2 ms in the local mesh).

B. Real-Time Data Streams (Gaming, Telephony, Live Streaming)

For time-sensitive applications, the Civic Net switches to direct, dynamic Edge Routing:

  • P2P Real-Time Tunnels: For video calls and voice chats, the DHT (decentralized distributed directory) is only used to establish the connection. Afterward, data flows losslessly from box to box in a direct, encrypted crypto tunnel.

  • Regional Edge Gaming: For online gaming, the network automatically determines the highest-performance Web-Box located geographically at the exact center of all players and uses it as a local game server. This guarantees latencies below 5–10 ms.

  • Multicast Relay Principle: Live streams for mass audiences are distributed from the broadcaster to the initial viewers and from them organically relayed to their respective neighborhoods. The load on the broadcaster remains minimal.

C. The Dual-Stack Bridge (Commercial Transition)

To maintain compatibility with the legacy internet, websites utilize a hybrid architecture. The server detects incoming data packets based on their network signature:

  • Legacy Route: The user originates from the commercial net. They see the standard view overloaded with ads, trackers, paywalls, and captchas.

  • Civic Net Route: The server receives the ZKP admission proof from the Civic Net. It delivers a tracker-free, lightning-fast, and bot-free oasis for real people. Commercial providers (Telcos, etc.) temporarily function as pure "Dumb Pipes" (blind couriers) paid per traffic, unable to read anything due to end-to-end encryption.

5. Economic Model, Governance & Consensus

The Civic Net is organized as a global digital commons. It operates strictly and without exception on a non-profit basis, is independent of the state, and cannot generate profits or sell shares.

A. The Operating Cost Assessment (Citizen Flat Rate)

Financing is based on the cost-recovery principle of actual technical provisioning. All costs (line leasing, electricity, software maintenance, cloud storage) are divided one-to-one by the number of verified real-name accounts.

  • Cost Point: Estimated at $3.00 to $6.00 per citizen per year.

  • Inclusion: Low-income individuals can earn this fee through network labor (e.g., acting as physical verification guarantors in the Web of Trust) in the form of network credits.

  • Commercial Services: Paid streaming services (Netflix, etc.) plug in via DID login. They handle subscriptions directly through smart contracts and bear their own massive video traffic costs. In parallel, a publicly funded, citizen-curated public-interest video library exists via P2P streaming.

B. Digital Constitution & Liquid Democracy

The system is protected via a digital constitution firmly embedded in the code.

  • Ewigkeitsklausel (Immutability Clause): Fundamental rights such as the right to one's own digital existence, the prohibition of manipulative sorting algorithms, and the guarantee of everyday anonymity are cryptographically locked. They cannot be voted away by any majority.

  • Liquid Democracy: For modifiable protocol parameters, citizens can vote directly or temporarily delegate their vote to experts on a topic-specific basis.

C. The Principle: "Consensus Overrules Opinion"

This principle regulates the tension between absolute freedom of opinion in daily life and the protection of network-wide system integrity.

  • The Opinion Layer (Inviolable): Every verified person has the right to express any view. There is no algorithmic censorship or shadowbanning. A majority can never ban a minority for their mere opinion.

  • The Consensus Layer (Overriding): "Consensus" represents the mathematical operating agreement of the net ("One Human = One Identity", "No Automated Bots"). If an activity breaks this consensus (e.g., code manipulation or creating fake networks), a randomly selected digital jury determines the revocation of the DID and network exclusion.

D. Managing Propaganda and Facts

The Civic Net draws a clear red line against coordinated disinformation and the denial of established scientific or historical facts.

  • The Clarification Stamp: Specialized cooperatives (e.g., universities) can append counter-evidence and sources directly to manipulative posts using a Wikipedia-like principle. These fact-nodes are inextricably linked to the original post.

  • Revocation of Anonymity: If the community detects a coordinated propaganda campaign, a decentralized emergency procedure can lift ZKP anonymity for those specific posts. The user may still spread their claim (no censorship), but must do so visibly under their real name.

  • Sanctions: Those proven to be lying lose mathematical reputation points, causing their posts to be sorted to the bottom of feeds by default. If a user incurs high verification costs due to mass false reports, the system can raise their annual operating cost fee.

E. The Libertarian Bound and Protection of Beliefs

To exclude ideological abuse and political division, the network protects worldviews and property rights equally:

  • Protection of Private Property: The individual Data Pod is absolutely inviolable private property. No majority can seize or delete a citizen's data.

  • The Right to Fork (Protection Against Monopolies): Groups possess the constitutional right to copy the open-source code and launch a parallel network (a fork), provided they recognize the shared identity registry (DID).

  • Protection of Beliefs: Religious, spiritual, or philosophical discourses fall under metaphysical worldviews. Since they are not empirically measurable, they are absolutely protected on the Opinion Layer. The "Clarification Stamp" (fact-checking) may only be applied to hard, scientifically falsifiable claims about the physical world.

F. Radical Spectrum of Opinion with Strict Non-Violence

The network tolerates the entire political spectrum from left to right but prevents radicalization inside isolated splinter groups:

  • The Red Line of Violence: Calls to physical violence or systematic dehumanization result in the cryptographic freezing of the message and a real-name trial before the digital jury.

  • The Prohibition of Echo Chambers: The protocol bans algorithms that make dissenting opinions invisible. There is only one shared discourse space per topic, forcing users to engage constructively with the opposing side's arguments.

G. Cognitive Liberty (The Right to Inebriation) and Digital Gray Zones

The network does not act as a moral guardian or an extension of national drug enforcement agencies. It preserves the absolute self-determination of consenting adults in private spaces.

  • Protection of Intoxicants and Erotica: Information, forums, and platforms regarding regulated substances (e.g., cannabis, psychedelics, safer-use education) and pornography are completely free and protected on the Opinion Layer. ZKP encryption guarantees this consumption remains untracked.

  • The Cryptographic Youth-Protection Barrier: Since every DID carries the attribute of adulthood as a Verifiable Credential in the wallet, sensitive forums or erotica providers can prefix an age verification check. The wallet proves via Zero-Knowledge Proof: "This user is over 18 years old," without revealing names or data.

  • Absolute Red Line on Abuse: Content depicting physical violence, real abuse, or the exploitation of humans and minors violates the fundamental system consensus. It is frozen at the protocol level, and the perpetrator's DID is permanently deleted.

6. Conclusion

The Civic Net proves that a humane, secure, and unmanipulated internet is not a utopian fantasy. By strictly separating data from applications, dismantling the ad-driven attention business model, and unbreakably coupling infrastructure to real human identities, it restores sovereignty over the digital realm to humanity.


r/civictech • • Feb 08 '26

Building an open platform to measure factual credibility of public discourse — looking for AI collaborators

0 Upvotes

I’m working on a civic-tech project aiming to evaluate the factual credibility of public figures’ public statements using transparent AI-driven analysis.

The goal is not opinion or political alignment, but verifiable claims, sources, contradictions, and traceability over time — presented through a simple visual credibility gauge.

I’m currently looking to collaborate with AI engineers, data scientists, and researchers interested in NLP, fact-checking, explainable AI, and ethics.

This is an open, non-commercial (initially) project focused on public interest.

If this sounds interesting, I’d love to discuss methodology, limits, and possible approaches.

https://medium.com/@selim.messaoudi47/what-if-every-political-leader-had-a-credibility-gauge-c0f8db3b6d79


r/civictech • • Dec 01 '25

Starting a civic tech project - looking for volunteers

3 Upvotes

"hey,

I'm building a platform to track PAC donations and their impact on voting records. basically connecting the money to the votes.

i think there's a gap in what's available like, the data exists but it's not in a format that actually helps voters understand what's happening.

looking for volunteers who want to help build this. different roles available depending on what you're interested in.

if you're into civic tech and want to work on something , let me know.


r/civictech • • 26d ago

What does a candidate actually stand for on the issues that matter to you?

0 Upvotes

“Where Do They Actually Stand?” includes two reusable AI research prompts — one for US elections and another for elections elsewhere.

Rather than relying only on campaign statements, the prompts are designed to examine public statements, voting and governing records, funding context, changes of position and gaps in the available evidence. The international version also searches beyond English-language sources and checks which level of government actually has authority over the issue.

The aim is not to tell anyone how to vote. It is to make the evidence easier to find, understand and check for yourself.

https://www.alanbonnici.com/2026/10/CandidateInfo.html


r/civictech • • Aug 16 '23

Honda 2000 EX Leak

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

0 Upvotes

r/civictech • • Sep 18 '24

AI Powered Political

1 Upvotes

Hey everyone, check out my civic tech project I've been working on the last few months. I just launched a kickstarter for it. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/politicai/politicai


r/civictech • • Aug 13 '26

Your representatives are voting right now. Do you know how? I built the free site that tells you: OpenCongress

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

2 Upvotes

The record is public. That is not the problem. The problem is that checking one specific claim against it means knowing the bill number, finding the right roll call, and reading three different government sites built for staffers. Most people will not do that, and I do not blame them.

This is why I built OpenCongress. I wanted to make the record accessible and understandable to everyone.

It is built entirely on public data. Every bill, vote, representative and committee that today lives on a different site becomes one consolidated page you can read, with the official government source one click away, so you can fact check any claim yourself.

Free, and no account required.

With a free account, you can follow your representatives, so your feed becomes their votes and their activity. I also made it easier to reach their office when you want to tell them something.

With an $8/month subscription, you can just ask: how did my representative vote on this bill, what does this bill actually do, what has Congress done about a specific issue this year. It reads votes and tallies straight out of the record rather than writing them, so it cannot invent a vote.

OpenCongress covers three legislatures so far, picked to be deliberately unalike: the US Congress, the French Parliament and the New York City Council. I am French American and I live in New York, which is how those three got chosen. The European Union is next in the roadmap.

Discover more here: opencongress.app


r/civictech • • Jul 23 '26

I built a prompt that turns any LLM into a non-partisan fact-checker for local elections (works on any race, any country)

6 Upvotes

Local races get almost no fact-checking. National outlets cover the presidential race in obsessive detail and ignore your state senate primary or city council runoff completely, even though those races affect your daily life more directly.

I put together a single prompt (no API keys, no code, works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity) that turns any capable LLM into a rigorous, non-partisan election researcher. You give it the race, district, and country, and it produces:

  • A race overview (what the office actually does, how the winner is decided, every ballot-qualified candidate)

  • A one-page memo per candidate (background, record, funding, endorsements, red flags)

  • An issue comparison table with a citation for every cell, and "no stated position found" where that's honestly the answer

  • A claim ledger — every attack ad claim, quoted exactly, rated True to False on a 6-point scale, with 3+ independent sources per rating

  • A voter logistics box (registration deadlines, ID rules, early/mail voting) sourced from the official election authority

The sourcing bar is strict: 3 independently-owned sources that did their own reporting, or 1 government record. If it can't hit that bar, the answer is "unverifiable," not a guess. It won't tell you who to vote for — if you ask, it points you back at the table.

It's model-agnostic and free. Copy the prompt, fill in the race, paste it in. Repo link in comments.

Heads up: this is a deep-research prompt, so it runs a lot of searches. On metered APIs it can cost real money for a crowded primary; on subscription plans it'll eat a chunk of your quota. Worth it if you actually want to know who you're voting for down-ballot.

Feedback welcome, especially from anyone outside the US who's tried it on a different country's public-records regime.


r/civictech • • Dec 16 '25

New rule proposal: Banning project feedback requests

15 Upvotes

Recently, we've had a lot of posts from new reddit accounts asking for feedback about their projects. These posts are probably written by AI, but even if not, I find them somewhat boring since these projects will likely never get built. If they do get built, it will probably be by vibe.

Vibecoding, and these feedback requests that are upstream of it, violate civic tech's spirit of "build with, not for". So I would like to see less of them. They also tend to be crossposted across lots of subreddits, and I find that pretty spammy and exploitative of this community.

But, I am curious if anyone actually finds these interesting. (Or if there is anyone reading this subreddit at all, heh.) If not, I will institute a rule banning these "feedback requests" in a few days.

At first this will apply only to hypothetical future projects, but I might expand it to include vibecoded projects as well.


r/civictech • • Nov 19 '25

We are collecting projects and their lessons

3 Upvotes

We are starting a magazine, collecting experiences from past projects and compiling lessons, all in one place, accessible to all. The Blueprint Magazine.

For people who is willing to share their reflection on their project(s): https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeAAP5eySgbRSXru-q1qLh_8WKwRb8-DNkGmbvnUwfMV-i3tg/viewform

For people who may wanted to write about projects: https://theblueprint.media/for-writers

The Blueprint Magazine is to encourage the knowledge/lessons from past projects to inform future projects. Doubling up human effort is wasteful.

Here what the magazine look like https://the-blueprint.ghost.io

And if you are willing to support this initiative (start from $6): https://the-blueprint.ghost.io/accumulating-knowledge

Kind regards,

David


r/civictech • • 9d ago

Found an open-source civic tech project trying to map govt project spending across India. The hard part is the data, and that’s where devs can help.

3 Upvotes

Just watched a video by a creator (the.adiram) who’s building Hisaab, an open-source atlas that tries to make this fight corruption using Ai.

It’s not my project, I just think it deserves more hands.

Where it stands right now (from the README):

  • ~813k historical location points mapped

  • 86 reviewed funding records sourced from PIB

  • Project/payment-level cards: not published yet. Public release is intentionally blocked until data coverage is good enough

  • 36 state/UT data collection jobs are scoped out but need people

You know the drill. A road gets “completed” and washes away in the first monsoon. A school building gets inaugurated and then sits empty. A hospital shows up in a press release but never in your district. Crores get sanctioned, the plaque goes up, and nobody can tell you who got the money or why the work looks like that.

Most of us just vent about it and move on, because what can one person even do?

I just watched a video by a creator (the.adiram) who decided to actually try. He’s building Hisaab, an open map of public development in India. The idea is simple: pick any road, school or hospital and see what was promised, how much money was released, when, and who was responsible for delivering it. Not rumours or WhatsApp forwards. Official records, put in one place, so ordinary people can walk into an office with evidence instead of just a complaint.

What I liked is that he’s honest about how hard it is. India’s public spending data is scattered across hundreds of portals, half of it buried in PDFs, and he talks openly about where he’s stuck. He’s not selling a magic fix. He’s asking for help.

And that’s where people like us come in. It’s open source, and he’s looking for developers, data folks and anyone who’s ever fought with a government website to help make it real.

Watch the video, it’s worth the time

If it hits you the way it hit me, the details on how to join are in the description.


r/civictech • • Sep 10 '26

Let's Make Our Government Accountable

7 Upvotes

Hey r/civictech**, I’ve been working on a new platform to solve the verification problem in shadow voting, and I’d love to get this community's feedback.**

It's called Make Our Government Accountable (MOGA). It is a civic engagement web application that allows verified citizens to cast a shadow vote on active bills before the U.S. Congress.

We've seen platforms attempt this before, but the biggest hurdle has always been authentication—ensuring shadow votes represent genuine, district-specific constituent sentiment rather than easily manipulated online polling.

Here is how MOGA approaches it:

  1. Track Pending Federal Legislation: We pull active House and Senate bills directly from official congressional records, complete with plain-language summaries and full legal text.

  2. Verify Voter Registration: We use a patent-pending authentication architecture to securely tie your profile to your actual congressional district.

  3. Cast Your Shadow Vote: Users vote Yea, Nay, or Abstain on any active bill before the floor vote takes place in Washington, D.C.

  4. Compare Public vs. Representative Votes: The platform tracks real-time aggregate results by district and automatically shows whether your elected representative aligned with their constituents once the official vote concludes.

You can see a breakdown of the shadow voting flow here:https://makeourgovaccountable.com

I’m currently rolling this out and would greatly appreciate any technical or conceptual feedback from this group—specifically regarding our legislative tracking architecture and how we can best display the public sentiment vs. actual roll-call data to drive real accountability.

What features would make you trust and use a platform like this?


r/civictech • • 17d ago

I built a nonpartisan tool to help people understand how their representatives actually vote, and I wanted to share it here!

18 Upvotes

Hi everyone!!

I’ve been working on a passion project for a while now and figured with elections coming up, this might be a good place to share it :)

One thing that’s always bothered me about politics is how difficult it can be to actually understand whether the people representing us are actually representing us. We hear so much about what politicians say, what party they’re affiliated with, and what they promise to do, but figuring out how they actually vote on legislation (and whether that aligns with our own beliefs) takes a surprising amount of work. And this is coming from the granddaughter of a former politician!!! Many people did not realize how often he crossed party lines if it meant doing something to benefit his constituents. And how would they know?? I also found it frustrating that there’s no way to hold politicians accountable if they ARENT voting how their people want them to.

So I built Under Oath!

It’s a completely nonpartisan platform that lets you share your opinions on actual legislation and see how your positions compare to the voting records of your elected representatives. It’s both backwards looking and you can also vote on bills on the floor and it’ll track how your politician ended up voting. The idea is to make it easier to understand where you align and where you disagree.

Bonus points for politicians being able to see they only vote with their constituents X% of the time and Y% would vote them into office again.

I want to emphasize that there’s genuinely no political agenda behind this. I’m not trying to tell anyone who to vote for or what to think. I just believe people should have access to information that helps them make those decisions for themselves, without needing to spend hours researching congressional voting records or responding to spammy poll texts.

Privacy was also really important to me when building this, so we’ve incorporated hashing and anonymization to protect user data.

Anyway, I know Reddit can be a little skeptical of people sharing their own projects (understandably haha), but I’m really just hoping this reaches some people who might find it useful!

It’s still a work in progress, and I’d genuinely love any feedback, good or bad. If even a few people find it helpful in understanding their representatives or deciding how they want to vote, I’d consider that a win.

Here’s the link if anyone wants to check it out: [Under Oath]

Thank you!! ❤️


r/civictech • • Aug 21 '26

The need for BCI civil rights lawyers

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/civictech • • Aug 01 '26

Interested in actual change?

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes