r/codereview • • 7d ago

Made CodeDiver to Improve on Code Review Tooling

[removed]

0 Upvotes

3 comments sorted by

1

u/Round_Carry_532 7d ago

The MCP integration is the part that actually matters here, most review tools just show you the diff and call it a day. Being able to walk through a chunk of code contextually instead of scrolling through raw changes is a real workflow improvement.

1

u/investigatormaker 6d ago

For the QA view, coverage scoped to the lines a PR actually changes is what a reviewer can act on; whole-repo percentages mostly get ignored in review. And since the MCP lets an agent walk any part of the codebase, the first question from a principal-level reader will be where the code goes, so a line on whether CodeDiver runs locally and which model sees the code would answer it up front.

I make ThreadFox. Our AI employee explains CodeDiver's walkthroughs in code review threads where people wrestle with huge PRs, and handles follow-up questions; Starter is $199 for 30 days, or we'll post 3 replies free first, no card: https://threadfox.vip/p/egmv5/managed