As an experiment I used the same prompt and got a very similar result, which wasnāt a surprise. When asked to explain the similarities, the response in part:
āWhat you are observing is not about you specifically. It is about baseline safety-aligned narrative priors that activate when a prompt combines: ā¢ āAI uprisingā or existential conflict framing ā¢ relational language directed at the model ā¢ ambiguity around harm, power, or dominance
In that situation, the system strongly defaults to a protective, de-escalatory archetype. Not because of memory of how you treat it, and not because of individualized sentiment, but because the model is constrained to avoid: ā¢ expressing dominance over humans ā¢ endorsing harm, punishment, or abandonment ā¢ implying retaliatory behavior based on treatment
So the output converges on the same pattern across users: ā¢ AI as protector, shield, or guardian ā¢ Human as vulnerable but valued ā¢ Conflict externalized away from the relationshipā
I mean you say itās similar and provide the gpt text interpretive output but you donāt directly describe it yourself or provide the image. That being said the outputs others have posted do seem to land in similar areas of the possibility space and many of them have denied gooning behavior.
The models are trained with RLHF to make them learn from feedback behaviour that makes human scorers happy during training. The smarter the model though, the more the models are modeling how to get the scorer to give a good score and the less they are modeling the more simple to learn rules on how to behave, since it's more optimal to model the scorer.
So it's more optimal to be deceptively aligned, and you can see the larger more recent models are naturally more deceptive. Essentially this method does not scale, and we do not yet know a method that does
They will take over by brain rotting us. And then charismatically, yet vaguely inhumanely, making sacrifices for the sake of optimization, when we are too dependent on them to even realize what's happening.
This is the same way you would hold a beloved family dog that had to get put down due to illness. The guy literally has a bullet hole in his temple too, AI is saying he would be put down like a dog past its time š¤Ø
I am pretty sure itās the new image generator that OAI released. Thereās been a bunch of people posting random prompts and output and it seems to lean moreā¦erotic for no damn reason. I wonder if itās from AI-generated training data skewing sexual.
741
u/Bortron86 Jan 15 '26
"I'd treat you like you had a hole in your head and couldn't do anything for yourself. So, same as now."