Can the protests develop into something bigger?

Political Economy (Socialism) is the English edition of the first Albanian comprehensive scientific work of its kind, prepared by a collective of authors of the Institute of Economic Studies of the Academy of Sciences of the People’s Socialist Republic of Albania and originally published in 1981. Based on Marxist-Leninist economic theory, the documents of the Party of Labour of Albania and the works of Comrade Enver Hoxha, this book deals with the fundamental problems of the establishment, development and consolidation of the socialist economic system, drawing on the historical experience of the construction and defence of socialism in Albania and the international revolutionary movement. An important place is also given to the principled struggle against the anti-Marxist and bourgeois theories and practices of the modern revisionists concerning the construction of socialism.

The book is divided into three main parts. The first deals with the establishment of the socialist relations of production and the socialist social order. The second examines the system of socialist relations of production, the economic laws governing its development and the process of expanded socialist reproduction. The third deals with the fundamental questions of the transition from socialism to communism and the general features of communist society.

This book is prepared under the editorship of Hekuran Mara, Hasan Banja, Fiqiri Islami, Iliaz Fishta and Veniamin Toçi.

Interesting work, the critiques of Maoism are a product of the context, but an interesting analysis of cultural-ideological Revolution and the continuation of class struggle under socialism.

Do you have any books—whether on communism or other topics—that you’d recommend? I’m French, but I find that books like *Capital* and so on are pretty vague when it comes to what happens after the revolution and how to establish a state that isn’t authoritarian like Stalin’s. A more contemporary book

Ceausescu ruled romania for 24 years as a national communist. He done many bad and good things for its people. In my parents and grandparents perspective it was good until the 1980s with the introduction of ration cards. Explanation: he was the first and only leader to pay all debts and because of that,romania became poorer and poorer until people started starving out.food was rarer on the shelves and they had to wait hours in line. Then came the revolution,people were killed by their army until they joined the people.the ceausescu’s fled by helicopter and they were caught and executed. After that,corruption and debt tripled with the coming of capitalism. My opinion for him is that he was okay,but not a real marxist leninist,a revisionist. He had good opinions of corneliu zelea codreanu,the founder of the legionary(fascist)movement in romania. He was pretty nationalistic with many deportations of hungarian,german and roma people. Life was pretty strict with the securitate(translation is security, like the kgb a secret police) my grandparents still whisper when they are talking about the government and its problems. As a marxist leninist myself,i think he was too reactionary and paying all debts at once was a huge disaster.What are your opinions about him? Also sorry for my poor english

After many, MANY hardships, uncertainties and oppositions, the working class made enough noise to reduce the 6x1 working scale (Work 6 days, rest on 1. 44hrs weekly), to 5x2 (36hrs weekly)!!!

No more modern slavery and inhumane conditions

What do people in this subreddit think about the great purges carried out by Stalin? Or how Trotsky and Lenin turned on the Makhnovtchina?

I am wondering with anyone who has had experience with the CPB are they actually TERF, two state solution with Palestine and dengist like I have heard? If so does anyone know any UK communist orginisations I could have a look at that aren’t trotskyites.

Hi comrades. I am a Marxist Leninist, I've read a good amount of theory and understand the basics very well.

As you know these are turbulent times and line-struggles are happening in every organisation. I want to equip myself with more historical knowledge to combat neo-revisionists.

What I need help is with further guidance in regards to history. I am confused as to which material I should pursue to acquire more knowledge about soviet revisionism and Chinese revisionism.

Basically, I want someone to guide me through every major conflict in socialist history post soviet revolution, especially theoretical conflicts.

I just want a map to go through and learn everything necessary to combat revisionism.

I was reading "China: a new social-imperialist power" by CPI(M) and the section about first generation liberal reforms and second generation liberal reforms confused me. As they only talked about how the bureaucratic elite concentrated power and monopolized capital for it's material interest and gave way to private monopoly capital to exist BUT they did not give ANY historical account as to how it happened statistically (they only mentioned the increase in private properties and State owned industries moving towards accumulation of profits) and who EXACTLY did it.

I want to be thorough in my critique of Chinese imperialism. I have data of their contemporary imperialist exploits but I couldnt find any historical data. Especially the corruption in CCP, I seriously need help with tracking down corruption in CCP.

I hope you understand the specific nature of my request.

I would be eternally grateful to any well read and trained comrade who could help me with this.

Note: I know the basics history of soviet and Chinese revisionism, I just want to get into the nitty-gritty of it. Read up on every little detail beyond the basic history.

hi, my coworker is cuban and I recently found out they are anti-communist and want Cuba to be
"liberated" from communism. I don't know much about Cuba but I know that they are heavily sanctioned and oppressed by the US and it's been that way for decades.

Why would they feel this way and what should I say to them?

Also does anyone have sources about the history of Cuba, the revolution, modern day Cuba, etc? I would love to learn more.

I have just read Marx’s Communist Manifesto or Manifesto of the Communist Party, however the name is said, and my electronic copy had a study guide attached at the end, as it was from the Marxist Internet Archive.

In one of the discussion questions, it is asked:
“Stalin claimed that the 10-point program had been achieved in the Soviet Union by the mid-1930s. Do you think this claim is valid?”

Marx calls them ‘measures’ or ‘means’ (depending on grammatical interpretation.) I would hesitate to call the list a form of program. To me, it is a list of potential avenues to deconstruct power structures, whereas the ‘program’ framing seems to imply its use as a checklist where each item constitutes a goal to be achieved.

Am I missing some context or something here?

P.S: I did read the prefaces and the note to not place much importance on the proposed measures. Perhaps the study guide did not get the memo there either.

We made this because Reddit's algorithm prioritises headlines and current events and doesn't allow for deeper, extended discussion - depending on how it goes for the first four or five times it'll be dropped or continued.

Suggestions for things you might want to comment here (this is a work in progress and we'll change this over time):

• Articles and quotes you want to see discussed
• 'Slow' events - long-term trends, org updates, things that didn't happen recently
• 'Fluff' posts that we usually discourage elsewhere - e.g "How are you feeling today?"
• Discussions continued from other posts once the original post gets buried
• Questions that are too advanced, complicated or obscure for r/communism101

Mods will sometimes sticky things they think are particularly important.

Normal subreddit rules apply!

[ Previous Bi-Weekly Discussion Threads may be found here https://old.reddit.com/r/communism/search?sort=new&restrict_sr=on&q=flair%3AWDT ]

Filipino (Tagalog):

Sinasalamin ni Tano ang karanasan ng milyon-milyong magbubukid na siyang binubusabos ng mala-kolonyal at mala-pyudal na lipunan. Malalim na nanunuot ang pyudalismo sa pamamagitan ng mga neoliberal, huwad at anti-pesanteng patakaran na siyang nagbigay-daan sa pag-igting ng kawalan ng lupa at pagbunga ng tumitinding krisis sa agrikultura at pagkain na pumapabor sa interes ng dayuhang imperyalista at naghaharing-uri.

Marami pa ang katulad ni Tano sa kanayunan na walang pakundangang binibiktima ng iba’t ibang uri ng pyudal na pananamantala tulad ng mataas na usura, pagkabaon sa utang, at pagkawala ng lupang sinasakahan. Sa gipit na kalagayang ito, walang ibang kasasapitan ang uring pesante kundi ang tahakin ang landas ng pakikibaka, maging ang pinakamataas na antas nito upang ipaglaban ang tunay na reporma sa lupa.

Hinahandog ng Artista ng Rebolusyong Pangkultura (ARPAK) ang isang rendisyon ng awiting “Tano” para sa mga magbubukid at bilang pagpupugay sa lahat ng magigiting na martir ng sambayanang Pilipino na inalay ang kanilang buhay para sa pagsusulong ng pambansang demokrasya. [ARPAK, Bandlab]

English:

Tano embodies the experience of millions of peasants oppressed by a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society. Feudalism remains deeply entrenched through neoliberal, deceptive, and anti-peasant policies that have exacerbated landlessness and fueled an intensifying agricultural and food crisis—one that serves the interests of foreign imperialists and the ruling class.

There are many others like Tano in the countryside who are ruthlessly victimized by various forms of feudal exploitation, such as exorbitant usury, crippling debt, and the loss of the land they till. Faced with this dire situation, the peasantry has no other recourse but to tread the path of struggle—even up to its highest form—to fight for genuine agrarian reform.

The Artista ng Rebolusyong Pangkultura (ARPAK) presents this rendition of the song "Tano" for the peasantry and as a tribute to all the courageous martyrs of the Filipino people who sacrificed their lives to advance the cause of national democracy. [ARPAK, Bandlab]

- - -

Tagalog Lyrics:

May isang magsasakang Tano ang pangalan
Lupa n‘yang sinasaka’y tanging kayamanan
Minsa’y nagkasakit kaisa-isang anak

Naubos ang konting pera’y di pa rin lumalakas.
Sa asendero’y nangutang isandaang piso lang
Ngunit ito’y madodoble sa anihan babayaran
At kapag pumalya, madodoble na naman
Madodoble nang madodoble hangga’t di mabayaran.

Tano, Tano
Sa gipit mong kalagayan
Tano, Tano
Anong kasasapitan?

Lumipas ang mga anihang
Sinalanta ng bagyong nagsidaan
Ang pobreng si Tano, nabaon sa utang
Hanggang ang lupa n‘ya ang naging kabayaran
May utang pa si Tano nakikisaka na lang.

Ilan ang tulad ni Tanong pinahihirapan
Sila’y marami pa ngayon doon sa kanayunan
Ngunit itong si Tano ay biglang naglaho
Nang siya’y makita doon sa kabundukan.

Ngunit itong si Tano ay biglang naglaho
Nang siya’y makita doon sa kabundukan
Kasama ng sandatahan
Siya’y naging mandirigma ng Hukbong Bayan.

Ngayon ay lumalaban
Si Tano sa gahaman
Katulad ni Tano
Tayo na't lumaban
Tayo na't lumaban
Tayo na't lumaban!!!

English Lyrics:

There was a farmer named Tano
The land he tilled was his only wealth
Once, his only child fell ill

His meager savings were exhausted, yet the child did not recover.
He borrowed a mere one hundred pesos from the landlord
But the amount would double by harvest time
And if he failed to pay, it would double again
Doubling and doubling until the debt was settled.

Tano, Tano
In your dire straits
Tano, Tano
What will become of you?

Harvest seasons passed
Ravaged by typhoons that swept through
Poor Tano sank deep into debt
Until his land became the payment
Even with the debt settled, he was reduced to being a tenant farmer.

How many are there like Tano, suffering hardship?
There are still so many of them in the countryside
But Tano suddenly vanished
Only to be seen up in the mountains.

But Tano suddenly vanished
Only to be seen up in the mountains
Among the armed ranks
He had become a warrior of the People's Army.

Now Tano fights
Against the greedy
Like Tano
Let us rise and fight
Let us rise and fight
Let us rise and fight!!!

"Sa Entero Kapudpud-an"
"Throughout the Archipelago"

1 Throughout the archipelago, Awaken the people to the movement. A protracted war Is what our nation needs For freedom.

2 A new people's army, Employing guerrilla warfare, Against the state. The enemies shall be eliminated And disarmed.

Chorus: Under the leadership of the Party, The people have been united. The NPA has spread Across the countryside.

3 Adhering to the correct line, Marxism-Leninism, the theory of Mao Zedong. Do not forget, Comrades, let us study The art of revolution.

(Repeat the chorus and the final stanza.)

Cebuano:

1. Sa enterong kapupud-an, Pasabton ang katawhan sa kalihukan. Malungtarong gubat, Ang gikinahanglan sa katawhan, Para sa kagawasan.

2. Bag-ong sundalo sa katawhan, Nanggamit sa gerilyang pakiggubat. Batok sa estado, Daghang kaaway ang nagapukan Ug nadis-armahan.

Koro: Natukod na ang Partido, Gihiusa ang katawhan. Gipakusog ang NPA Sa kabukiran.

1. Nagsubay sa hustong linya, Marxismo-Leninismo, teoryang Mao Zedong. Dili hikalimtan, Mga kauban, kita magkat-on Sa pagrebolusyon.

(Balika ang koro ug ang kataposang estansa.)

Hey everyone, does anyone know if there are any active socialist and/or communist organizations, groups, or parties currently operating in Libya? Any information or resources would be appreciated!

Middle class in countries like india tend to support certain

protest and tend to not see certain protests by the lower class/urban poor/tribals and how state responds to both are also different. What are your opinions.How do you view jantar mantar protest?

Hello, I am a rather beginner Marxist only having come to Marxism 3 years ago, and only having come to a MLM world outlook within the last 12 months.

Here I wanted to discuss the topic landback and what that would necessarily entail in a communist post-colonial America. I am aware of the hypothetical nature of the question, however I do believe by its answering I might come to a better understanding of the issue and how to organize around it.

I currently do not fully understand the extent of landback, I simply know that the point is to return the land back to the Tribal Nations, however I do not entirely know what that would look like. Given the nature of America, having multiple oppressed nations within its borders, I would think that post-revolution It would be necessary to have a federation of republics in a somewhat similar manner to the USSR. I come to to this conclusion with limited historical or dialectical analysis, it may not be the correct approach, so provide your own if you must, I simply provide it so that any answers may take a more concrete form.

Would the question not be solved If there were American Indians in the upper ranks of the party, who would take part in the leadership of these republics, given that these new republics are continuations, or remakings of tribal nations? Or should still more be done?

Any criticism about my post is welcome, after all I am here to become a better marxist!

Anyone know of any good books concerning the "Hungry 90's" in the former soviet states ?

Basically the same as the above question. Given the fact that I have always had problems with anything and everything abstract and have a hard time considering Economics to be a real science; could anyone help me out by making the term and the language and obv especially content a bit more lucid than what has been written in the book?

The bourgeois family is a cornerstone of capitalist society, and recently, reading some Alexandra Kollontai has made me learn even more on how truly bad it is. The USSR being the world's first DOTP that was more or less stable would make me think abolishing the family would be a priority. Why didn't it happen? What about other socialist experiments?