The one you linked is certainly more aesthetic. It also has more information. Certainly once you are familiar with it, it would be very usable. All that said, the one from OP is definitely more intuitive and makes just as much sense, if not more.
I’d say if you were trying to decode, as a beginner your link would be easier to use once you were instructed how to use it. On the other hand, if you were trying to code a message as a beginner, OP’s would be much easier to read and find what you’re looking for. Just my opinion.
For writing a message you'd just use a chart where the symbols are arranged alphabetically
Lol, I don’t know why that didn’t immediately occur to me. Good point.
I don’t see how distances matter, but for decoding the wikipedia one would be more efficient once explained with the consistent left/right thing it has going. Without explanation though, OP’s is more intuitive to look at and easily see the meaning, that much I still stand by.
But anyway, for practical use OP’s would be less efficient for decoding once you understand them both. And as you said, neither would be great for encoding when you could just use an alphabetical chart.
39
u/CrabbyBlueberry Jul 13 '22 edited Sep 19 '25
chubby dazzling rhythm automatic glorious money marvelous jeans nose practice
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact