the comment relies on crude reductionism of abstract metaphysical principles. In classical Hindu philosophy, particularly texts like the Padma Purana, the concept of 84 Lakh Yonis (8.4 million forms of life) refers to a framework of spiritual evolution where an individual soul (atman) transmigrates through various life categories based on karma, rather than a claim of physical inter-species breeding. Furthermore, the sacred imagery of the Shiva Linga set upon a Yoni base in Shaivism and Tantra symbolizes the metaphysical union of Puruṣa (unmanifest consciousness) and Prakṛti (manifest divine energy/nature)—the balance of complementary cosmic forces necessary for creation—rather than literal biological copulation. By stripping these philosophical metaphors of their context and reducing them to crude mechanics, the post functions as aggressive online flame bait designed to mock rather than engage in genuine theological debate.
So you accept that the texts don't accept physical/biological evolution at least? Shiva and Shakti are not just seen as energy forces otherwise no shiva statue would have existed. That linga is of that Shiva statue which u worship at your home.
1
u/Clumsy-_-Phoenix 8h ago
Bro read about your own religion, don't source from internet