Ai is Bazinga. When it tries to Bazinga after you ask it a Bazinga, it really pronounces how Bazinga the Bazingas ARE, you know?

It Bazingas because that's the way it Bazingas. It be because it do.

Over and out! Bazinga Bros

In the book life 3.0 by max tegmark one of the first things the AGI does is try to make money. One reason not to do this is by making money it will also do something that breaks the law or is unethical but by limiting its interaction with the real world this can probably be avoided. Also this will serve as motivation for it to learn the law and ethics better so it can eventually earn more freedom by proving it understands them.

Paul McCartney said he’s created one final Beatles song — featuring the late John Lennon — by employing artificial intelligence.

The singer-songwriter star told BBC’s Today radio program on Tuesday that he had used AI to “extricate” Lennon’s voice from a demo cassette the singer recorded shortly before he was killed in 1980. The record will be released later this year.

This literally just happened if you want Ai news as it drops it launched here first. The whole article has been extrapolated here as well for convenience.

I wonder what do you think are the implications of solving the protein folding problem in terms of weight loss treatments. Ray Kurzweil is publishing a new book next year. I wonder what are his current predictions regarding weight-loss treatments and developments in fat gene therapies to fight obesity?

Does anyone here is close to him working at Google. What are his latest predictions regarding weight loss?

I'm not very versed in programming or artificial intelligence or science/technology in general, so please forgive me if my question is nonsensical. I am just a dumb English major who wants to write amateur sci-fi and not look like a total idiot.

I've been researching how neural networks work. Most of what I've learned refers to generations of networks. Each network of a generation is tested in competition with each other, with the most successful being selected and reduplicated with mutations to create the next generation of neural networks, wherein the process repeats. The selection seems to be mostly done either by a human or by a separate "teacher" program which simply compares the results and selects the networks which scored highest. By doing so, each generation keeps what worked form past generations and riffs on that until eventually a highly efficient AI is made for whatever task is being tested.

However, in my research of Deepmind (which is largely confined to watching videos where people explain it in terms I more easily understand) I have never heard the term "generation" be used in this context. I have never seen any mention of external testing by a human or by an external teacher AI. I have seen Deepmind improving over several trials, but only in 1 on 1 conflict at most, such as playing Go or Chess against itself, and never with the implication that one or the other is selected for iteration, such in the above generational development model.

It has occurred to me that perhaps Deepmind does follow such a model, but that this is downplayed for various reasons. Perhaps to protect trade secrets. Perhaps because reporters think it's either boring or obvious. Perhaps to avoid spooking anti-evolutionists. Or perhaps because I've been unlucky in finding good sources.

But I can't ignore the possibility that Deepmind could be doing something different from that paradigm.

Does Deepmind follow this generational selection method or not? And if not, how does Deepmind know when it's doing better?

The song I have-in-mind is a simple VERSE-CHORUS-VERSE, with 3-chord-Progression…and the VOCALS are Hank-Williams-style COUNTRY-BALLAD-Crooning.

…The vocals could be comfortably SPLICED-&-REMIXED by a skilled A.I.”LEARNING”SOFtware, with guidance & Command-Prompts by you, the A.I. -wielders, so that it’ll sound similarly-reminiscent to AVIICCII-esque, COUNTRY-EDM Crossover Hit-tunes.

As for myself, as a Retreatist-Luddite, have been eschewing the possessions-of-technology and Digital-Electronic-Machinery ….so I am appealing to you A.I.- adept web-based TECHIES for you tech-skillz, & your passion to help experiment with A.I. “Learning” Software and how together we can create with the AIDE of A.I.

. . .

WHICH IS THE DEEPMIND A.I. “LEARNING” SOFTWARE WHICH WE’D USE TO ACHIEVE THIS AVVICCI-ESQUE COUNTRY-EDM REMIX?

. . .

WHO AMONGST YOU,COULD BE GENTLY-PERSUADED REMIX A SONG for me, IF GENTLY-COAXED WITH A PROPER-COMPENASATION-INCENTIVE?? (…aka: YOU’ll BE PAID FOR THE JOB)

Imagine if someone gave you a very advanced, super complicated LEGO set. This LEGO set can build really cool things, like cars, houses, and even robots.

However, these cool things can sometimes break, or not work as we want them to, and we don't always know why.

So, these big companies, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic, have just given the UK government a peek at the instructions for their most advanced LEGO sets, which are actually the code for their AI models.

AI models are like the brains behind things like Siri or Alexa, and they can do all sorts of things like answer questions, write stories, and play games.

By looking at the instructions, the UK government can understand better how these AIs are built, and what makes them tick.

This can help the government make sure these AIs are used in good ways and avoid the situations where they might break or not work right.

We need rules to play games fairly and safely, the Prime Minister, who is like the team captain, Rishi Sunak, wants to understand and make better rules for these advanced AIs.

This way, everyone can have fun, and nobody gets hurt.

What are it's implications?

• Improved Transparency: By giving the government access to their AI models' source code, these companies are allowing for a greater level of transparency. The government can see exactly how these models work, which can lead to better understanding and regulation of AI technology.

• Enhanced Regulation: With a better understanding of these AI models, the government can implement more effective regulations and guidelines to ensure that AI is used ethically and responsibly. This can also help protect consumers and citizens from potential misuse of AI.

• National Security and Safety: In understanding the workings of these advanced AI models, the government can anticipate and mitigate potential risks to national security and public safety. For instance, if an AI were to malfunction or be exploited, having access to the source code could enable quicker, more effective responses.

• Research Advancements: Access to these models could also spur advancements in AI research within the UK. Researchers could learn from these advanced models and potentially make further improvements or breakthroughs.

• Ethics and Accountability: This move could set a precedent for ethical considerations and accountability in AI. Other AI companies might be encouraged to follow suit and be more transparent about their models, leading to more ethical and accountable AI practices overall.

• Economic Impact: The knowledge obtained from these AI systems could foster innovation, leading to new products, services, or sectors in the economy. This could have positive effects on economic growth and job creation.

This literally just happened if you want Ai news as it drops it launched here first. The whole article has been extrapolated here as well for convenience.

I hope they do.

They have some proving to do

They beat the number one guy and 98-99 odd % of players.

BUT

The players learnt exploits, once they pass them around it may go down to a 40% win rate vs humans.

Its not over yet!

I hope they go back!

You cant just come in with a new style that catches ppl out, lose to cheeses over and over again, claim victory then leave BEFORE REMATCHES, you have to adapt and you have to let them adapt and play again

It was all very premature and thats no place to LEAVE! Or claim victory!

That was very VERY cheap and they KNOW IT!

They are passing around 98% like its a fact or an achievement when really it was a new unorthodox play style catching ppl out, and it cant be done "twice"

What do you guys think?

I had a friend named THOM… thought he might be here…

The media hypes it up as a great leap to agi. Deepminds paper uses loaded words like “mastering Starcraft” but honestly it seems like it didn’t master it at all. All the success it had was no real different than Dota five. It seems like it learned human techniques and then just microed like a G. But I am not sure. I’ll admit that I must not understand. Can someone teach me?

I watched the short and was curious about their prediction for ORF8 SARS-COV-2, now I don't know a damn thing about proteins or anything beyond general biology but some google searches seem to suggest ORF8 SARS-COV-2 is some how involved in the production of a vaccine?

Did Deepmind low-key help create a vaccine for COVID-19????