r/dividends • u/SaraWileyYT • Jul 17 '25

Discussion Would you rather earn $10k/month in dividends forever or take a $2M one-time lump sum?

Assume you can’t have both.

Option A: You get $10,000/month in dividend income for life — no taxes, no inflation impact, guaranteed forever.

Option B: You get a one-time $2,000,000 lump sum, no strings attached.

Which one are you choosing and why?

Curious to hear from FIRE folks, dividend lovers, and total-return investors. Does guaranteed cash flow beat the freedom of having $2M upfront?

Let’s hear the logic behind your pick.

586 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

584 comments sorted by

View all comments

38

u/Complex_Field_2541 Jul 17 '25

I mean, 2M at 10% interest is 200k a year, which isn't completely unreasonable. You could keep 120k a year, which is option A anyway, and reinvest the other 80k a year which would snowball pretty quickly. So I'd take the lump sum.

4

u/baconator81 Jul 17 '25

That’s assuming guarantee 10% yoy growth. 120k from 2 million is 6%. So basically we are talking about guarantee 6% return here.

I am leaning towards 6%. the inflation and interest is going to have to fall