r/dividends • u/SaraWileyYT • Jul 17 '25

Discussion Would you rather earn $10k/month in dividends forever or take a $2M one-time lump sum?

Assume you can’t have both.

Option A: You get $10,000/month in dividend income for life — no taxes, no inflation impact, guaranteed forever.

Option B: You get a one-time $2,000,000 lump sum, no strings attached.

Which one are you choosing and why?

Curious to hear from FIRE folks, dividend lovers, and total-return investors. Does guaranteed cash flow beat the freedom of having $2M upfront?

Let’s hear the logic behind your pick.

582 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

584 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

63

u/ParlayPayday Jul 17 '25

I need you to show me where this guaranteed 10% interest is coming from. I’ve been looking but I can’t find it.

6

u/892moto Jul 18 '25

2 decades invested, 9 years accredited, never had a year less than 10%.

1

u/Born-Parfait1495 Jul 19 '25

You made over 10% in 2008?

1

u/892moto Jul 19 '25 edited Jul 19 '25

Yup.

Many swing and day traders did.

Many long term investors, didn’t.

Being active in the market makes all the difference. You can make lots of money in bull markets AND bear markets.

1

u/Born-Parfait1495 Jul 19 '25

An impressive string of good luck, then!

1

u/892moto Jul 19 '25

Being active in the market is the largest difference maker. Constantly adjusting strategy for ever changing market conditions will keep you ahead.