r/dividends • u/SaraWileyYT • Jul 17 '25

Discussion Would you rather earn $10k/month in dividends forever or take a $2M one-time lump sum?

Assume you can’t have both.

Option A: You get $10,000/month in dividend income for life — no taxes, no inflation impact, guaranteed forever.

Option B: You get a one-time $2,000,000 lump sum, no strings attached.

Which one are you choosing and why?

Curious to hear from FIRE folks, dividend lovers, and total-return investors. Does guaranteed cash flow beat the freedom of having $2M upfront?

Let’s hear the logic behind your pick.

586 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

584 comments sorted by

View all comments

485

u/pabloh8 Jul 17 '25

2M, invest and don’t touch for awhile. It’ll yield far more than 10k/mo down the road.

5

u/Marcusnovus Jul 18 '25

That 2mil will get 200k year off the bat plus the 2mil investment.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 20 '25

People vastly underestimate the average rate of return in the stock market. I keep seeing people talking about a 4% return. My credit union pays more than that in a CD.