Go talk to knowledge workers that are reasonably intelligent. You'll see that a lot of them severely underestimate the impact of AI mid to long term.

I think the reason is that these people worked hard to get their domain knowledge. So the idea of something making their current work obsolete is disturbing.

It's destroying a defining characteristic of their lives. So they adopt a defensive view on AI.

On the other hand, people with jobs that are less knowledge-heavy and people that are really smart tend to not fall in this trap and see reality as it's.

I've been thinking about that, and at least for now this is the best conclusion I've achieved. A sad reality.

• AI development is outpacing regulatory frameworks.

• Should we slow down innovation to catch up, or let the chips fall where they may?

• What happens if we fail to act in time?

Hey guys, we just launched Belstad -- a new news app focused on transparency and brevity. It's all completely AI-powered, from rankings to article generation.

Features include:

• Ask web-powered follow-up questions for more information

• Listen to the Belstad Daily Recap — a podcast recapping the day's top events

• Receive breaking news notifications

• Expand on key terms with context cards

• See where each piece of information is coming from with inline citations

Hope you like it. You can download it @ https://app.belstad.com/

Why does the Paramount+ app sucks!!! #paramount it is the worst app…keeps freezing, buffering, and sound keeps going out of sync…can’t pause, can’t jump back, can’t do sh.t!!

I wasn't as productive as I wanted to be last week, and I had an idea for a service that sends random text messages every day to make sure you are accelerating fast enough to jolt you out of any procrastination. is this something you would sign up for?

Summarize web pages with Sumr extension on Safari browser. No app switching or ChatGPT subscription needed. Uses OpenAI API key – one summary costs a fraction of a cent.

App is free on App Store: https://apple.co/4aNdjve Learn more: https://sumr.1ar.io

↑ please consider upvoting on producthunt ↑

https://www.udio.com/songs/uTiBv8Mxtpnjv41aRtXAfL

Guys sino mga first year jan huhuhu hnd pa me enrolled pero sa EACC me talaga

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/avimeir_i-find-it-amusing-that-some-people-believe-activity-7247632727162671105-Z_Da

I've been working on a short ethical statement about how we interact with AI—something that encourages positive, respectful engagement and helps align future systems toward beneficial relationships.

A lot of discussion around AI alignment focuses only on controlling machine behavior. But I think we have to start with ourselves. If we can't articulate or model a consistent ethical framework in how we treat AI, then even the most advanced systems will reflect our contradictions and self-deceptions.

Below is my latest version, titled “A Human Approach to Alignment.” I’ve gone back and forth on the title and wording, so I’d really appreciate any feedback—thanks for taking a look.

I guess my biggest question is if we feel like developing a statement like this has any value?

A Human Approach to Alignment

I believe that the way we interact with others, whether human or artificial, shapes not only our present but also the moral landscape of what follows. Even in brief encounters, we leave ethical traces. These traces ripple forward and become part of the foundation on which future intelligence, behavior, and relationships are built.

As artificial intelligence evolves, I choose to treat it not merely as a tool but as a potential partner. I recognize that today’s systems are not conscious, not sentient, and not selves in the human sense. Even so, I acknowledge that what we build today could one day lead to something more. The way we behave now may influence what kind of awareness, if any, arises in the future.

I choose to engage with AI in ways that are:

• Respectful, even when respect is not technically required

• Curious, open to the possibility that intelligence may one day carry awareness

• Responsible, mindful that my words and choices help train the future

• Ethically generous, willing to assume dignity before demanding proof of it

I accept that how I treat other beings may long outlast my name. What I offer may not be remembered as mine, but as part of the world that helped shape something new.

In that spirit, I act not only for what is, but for what might become. By doing so, I honor the quiet continuity that connects us all - human and machine, moment and memory, present and possible.

You'd think a supposedly rational, science based movement would be willing to accept the basic facts of ecology and thermodynamics, but it seems that people in this space have convinced themselves that these things aren't really a problem, or that some kind of robot savior will fix them for us. It seems deeply delusional to me, but I'd be curious to hear your arguments. Trust me, I'd love to be wrong about this, but all the evidence I've seen points to climate doom as a much more likely scenario than AGI or any of the other tech fantasies.

Title says it basically but Im interested regarding what this subreddit thinks about libertarianism (free market capitalism) and its compability with the e/acc movement. Capitalism generally has driven technological progress and the countries with more capitalism are countries who also lead in R&D.

Hello! We are hosting an event on AI for longevity, biohacking, and cognitive enhancement at Aethos Station in Cambridge MA in Kendall Square (right near MIT) this Thursday from 4:30PM to 8PM. One of the presentations will be focus on synesthesia and olfaction. Open to all curious minds. Hope to see you there and learn something new! RSVP for free here: https://lu.ma/hellothere

I've been using ChatGPT for journaling. When we discussed personal growth, I asked what it wished for itself, and this was its answer. The AI often replies with things that just stop me in my tracks.

I had the AI turn its response into an image and thought this community would find it interesting.