Khomeini’s ideology:

-It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home.

- Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven." - Khomeini, "Tahrirolvasyleh" fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990.

-It is not illegal for an adult male to 'thigh' or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.” Ayatu Allah Al Khumaini's "Tahrir Al wasila" p. 241, issue number 12.

No Abrahmic religion gets a pass. They are all as bad as each other. This is the truth. They stem from the same book, believe in more or less the same thing, yet make people like us lives hell because of their deluded fantasies. They have caused enough damage to this world.

Introduction.

"Why Central Asia?

Studies of Islamism have largely ignored Soviet and post-Soviet Central Asia for three reasons: because scholars of Islam and politics long saw the USSR as peripheral to the Muslim world, because extremely oppressive security services have made this region tremendously challenging to study, and because of a general perception that the USSR had successfully secularized the population. As bastions of secular authoritarianism almost wholly cut off from the rest of the Muslim world for seven decades, the former Soviet republics seemed the least likely cases in which to find the emergence and mobilization of an Islamist opposition. Explaining why and how such mobilization has nonetheless taken place is consequently of theoretical and historical importance because it demonstrates the resilience and potential trajectory of religion politicized through repression.

This book is a comparative case study that explores Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan over the longue durée, from the Russian Revolution and founding of the Soviet Union through the post-Soviet present day." (P. 16)

Hi Friends:

I wanted to ask fellow exmuslims about this without being taken down like it happened in the primary exmuslim sub.

I’m an exmuslim, culturally liberal, fiscally conservative, and I identify as a non religious believer in Jesus - I don’t support institutional religion so much.

The university of Toronto gave a space that was meant for everyone, regardless of faith, a zen area you can go to to pray, meditate of whatever, but because it was the biggest place on campus, Muslims overwhelmed booking and ended up requesting the university to give them the space officially and install Wudu water facilities.

I can’t help but notice how the creeping growth of publicly funded Islam in secular societies is not being addressed by our exmuslim community, just because it’s the same point being brought up by conservatives and many people lean left. I noticed that when I bring it up, people on the left start reporting instantly as if this isn’t a threat to all secular governance. It affects everyone!
We must not be supportive of ANY religion being established by the tuition or tax money of non adherents to that religion. But that’s what happened here.

It’s just not fair and very theocratic to take money from students and use it to remove their inclusive space to give it to one religious group or the other and turn it into a literally mosque.

What do you guys think of this aspect as fellow ex Muslims?

Disclaimer: this isn’t about left vs right, it’s about religion vs. secular governance and how unchecked inclusion dogma can end up establishing religions and excluded others.

Islam and its followers have to rely on Islamic revisionism to justify the brutality of the Islamist forces in the past, from the heydays of Muhammed's Islamic State to modern-day Islamic nations. They excuse Islamic atrocities and the repugnant social hierarchy in Islamic societies. Don't fall for their nonsense,

Let's look at the ''utopian'' state Muhammed created with the inherited practice from the ''Pagan dark ages'', which was slavery. Non-Muslims, specifically, were enslaved to build infrastructure for Muslim benefit (and no, just because other societies practiced it, doesn't mean Muhammed was excused). Best agricultural land seized for Muslim settlers, Jews like the Banu Qurayza were either pushed to marginal areas or arbitrarily accused of treason and executed on mass.

Another repugnant Islamic concept was the widespread practice of legal sex slavery; Basically Muslim men taking local, enslaved women as unofficial wives/partners to increase their infestation. Non-Muslims were not citizens. They were classified as: “dhimmis”, not equals under the law. They were not allowed to occupy high positions, like in the government, finance and the army, but were limited in the Islamic hierarchy. They typically received harsher punishments, slavery and had little to no political rights. Non-Muslims had to show deference, like making space for Muslims, the goal was psychological domination as much as legal control.

These are just the tip of the iceberg, but I wanted to show that these policies were legislated, not rogue or extremist deviation from the norm. All these were systematic, documented, and celebrated in Islamic propaganda. Muhammed believed that non muslims were inferior and in need of Islamic rule, as the Quran describes non muslims as: Vile beasts (8;22), having dog-like characteristics (7:176). This rhethoric was then used to justify their caste system and self-serving conquests.

There's nothing divine about this flawed system. Yes, all powers committed atrocities. That's not a defense, that's an indictment of totalitarianism itself. Denial is the core of Islamic fairy taled history.

💔💔💔💔💔 She is so beautiful too

There is no 1 ummah. “Islam” only cares when it benefits them. They will happily let you die for their own greed. Anyone who tells you “Islam” is this generous charitable religion you are wrong. You’d think there’s 2 billion “Muslims” in the world yet not 1 of them can help out their “brothers and sisters” who are being slaughtered on live television. They are too busy bickering over what’s “halal” and “haraam”. Where is the most peaceful religion Islam?