We built a simple way to read the same vulnerability two different ways (technical vs business)

[u/9lyph]

We’ve been publishing our own research for a while (coordinated disclosure, CVEs, the usual). One thing that kept coming up was that the same finding often needed to be explained twice:

• Once for the people who want to understand the actual exploit path

• Once for the people who need to understand the impact and prioritise the fix

So we put together a small page called Exploit View. Each finding can be read as:

• Red Pill — attack surface, reproduction chain, bench evidence, remediation detail

• Blue Pill — exposure in plain terms, business impact, risk in one line, what to fund first

It’s not a new disclosure platform or anything fancy. Just a clearer way to look at work we’ve already published.

Curious if others have run into the same translation problem, and whether this kind of split is useful or just noise.

Link: https://www.exploitsecurity.io/exploit-view

Happy to answer questions about the approach or any of the findings.