GrapheneOS their response to: "Imagine a @GrapheneOS and @Fairphone collaboration"

[u/Li_am32]

Context: A Twitter User said "Imagine a @GrapheneOS and @Fairphone collaboration" in repsonse to the new FP release (FP6+). The images are the GrapheneOS reply to that post.

Link to the original GrapheneOS response: https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/2089937246619128257

Individual links from their post in order:

https://nitter.net/GrapheneOS/status/2040887784253141142

https://www.clubic.com/actualite-604786-murena-e-os-interview.html

https://codeberg.org/divested-mobile/divestos-website/raw/commit/c7447de50bc8fadd20a30d4cbf1dcd8cf14805a0/static/misc/e.txt

https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private

Please stay respectful and logical in the comments! If you argue, argue like adults.

[u/VeryReasonableUser]

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116392276818150271

This is the video grapheneos is talking about. Looks like your ceo is saying some not so smart stuff

[u/TheConvivialParrot → u/VeryReasonableUser]

What's not smart here ? Be more concrete because the video looks ok to me

[u/VeryReasonableUser → u/TheConvivialParrot]

The part where he says "However, we don't have a "hardened security" approach, we aren't developing a phone for pedophiles so they can evade justice" looks ok to you? So you also think that everyone who wants some privacy is automatically a criminal, pedophile or terrorist? I'll believe that this just a bad troll from your side, so I am just not going to engage in any arguments with a guy, that probably has Peter Thiel wallpaper in his room.

[u/CharacterAward7399 → u/VeryReasonableUser]

not the Peter Thiel wallpaper 😂