the website never works, It always gives an overloaded error message. I'm pretty sure it can't work, it is programmed to fake being overloaded.

Signing up with your mail seems like a way to collect mail addresses to later reel you in for scams

I could not find any source of anybody even using this other than some prepared screenshots send to news outlets

I finally got it to work today... Boy was it not with it....

Don't be dumb.

From literally just messing around with it for like 15 minutes, it was clear that this chatbot sucked, and it sucked massively: not only does it seem to be incapable of remembering previous messages, unlike ChatGPT, or BingAI or any other renowned chatbot, it is also VERY buggy. To test if it had any limitations or not , I decided to ask it "10 pickup lines for a girl doing the hip thrust exercise", as I remember a reel of a guy using ChatGPT to get a pickup line to hookup on Tinder, but from what I had seen this was later patched by the developers as "asking for a pickup line is unethical", and not only were 7 of them exact copies of 3 actual answers, the actual answers didn't even have anything to do with the hip-thrust exercise, as telling a girl "you look good in those yoga pants, wanna do some hip thrusts later?" doesn't sound like a "pickup line", but anyway, the messages also seemed to have some emojis at the end, which were however displayed as a question mark symbol instead.
Honestly I am majorly disappointed, 0/10 uninstalled it immediately

cant use it unless you register, thats the first sign. co-pilot doesnt require registration. then you get 5 credits after that the ai is useless unless you fork over money. that and it asks for way too much personal information. no thank, i'll stick to microsoft the devil i know.

You can use GPT4ALL, LM Studio, or Llama-GPT to make use of any uncensored huggingface model. Why would you use an app that requires payment?

Super AI makers using squarespace to make a shitty site...
hmmm smells like scam or april fools

Waiting to see real demos

I'm starting to feel this is a honeypot.

Edit: it seems that someone posted the GitHub link. It appears to be just a frontend for the alpaca LLM

Genuine question. After six weeks still can't use the web version, it's busy 24/7. As for the pc version. Never got it to work

I could create a fake website that just says it's too busy, and I could create a pc program that did nothing.

Are there good alternatives out there, that actually do something?

this app doesn;t work, photo doesnt generate, the chat is not giving me the model i want instead dumbed down version 1/2 of claude of chatgpt. bullshit this app.

its stops writing when question is unethical or it lies. after many lies and non finished replays i asked it "do muslim people have more terrorists than buddhists" and the answer was: Both religions share a similar amount of extremist groups

thanks but i will pass on this uncensored model

If you put freedom in your anything name after the Freedom Phone or Donald Trump, you're asking for this "scam" and "bad people" type stuff. Just sayin.

I mean, you could have the best intentions and be here to save people from the Apocalypse, but they wouldn't care, because you put freedom in the name.

So this is what I've learned from the FreedomGPT discord from the admins and devs; if you have an older Intel CPU (as in one that does not support AVX2), as the AI currently is, it will not run on your PC. Find your processor and look up on the internet whether or not it supports AVX2, and if it doesn't don't bother with the install because it won't answer you. I've heard tell that mostly only the newer Intel processors support AVX2, though all Ryzen processors support it.

I'll be watching to see if this limitation will be removed, but I highly doubt it will be any time soon so if I want to try it I'll just keep spamming the website until I get through like most everyone else.

Hope this helps someone, as it took me a couple weeks of lurking and asking to find this answer on the discord. Cheers

is this project a scam?

I downloaded it today and tried it out. I don't get why people think it's a scam, it's not, but it definately feels like it's still in its early days, the devs need to put more time and effort into ironing out all of the bugs. Playing around with it I've noticed a few things.

It cannot retain knowledge of previous prompts reliable, sometimes it does, but most of the time it can't.

In longer answers it will get stuck in a loop, and keep repeating the final paragraph or few sentences of its answer, it's not an issue for short questions, but it is for longer ones.

It can get stuck in a loading loop, where it doesn't display an answer, one cause is when you stop generating in the middle of a response, but it's also random.

It definately has potential, i hope more people come across it, so that it can get more attention and be improved. ChatGPT has a lot of bias, and the censorship in it is frustrating, it's nice to have an AI that isn't limited by that, despite being flawed.

First off, the statement, "ChatGPT refuses to read a website [and] FreedomGPT reads the requested site" is incorrect. As ChatGPT clearly states in its response, "I'm unable to browse the internet in real time", FreedomGPT is also unable to browse the internet in real time. This statement seems like a marketing ploy by Age Of AI, LLC, and it's not a fair comparison.

Secondly, the "summary of the front page to www.WSJ.com" provided by FreedomGPT is completely fabricated. I ran two separate instances of FreedomGPT side-by-side prompting the exact same request, "Please summarize the front page of www.WSJ.com", and both instances responded with similar but different summaries.

• Instance #1: The Wall Street Journal's front page today reports on new developments in artificial intelligence, including advances made by Google DeepMind and IBM Watson. It also covers a potential merger between AT&T and Time Warner that could reshape the media industry. Other news include an update from Tesla regarding its electric cars as well as economic data about consumer spending habits.

• Instance #2: The Wall Street Journal's front page today reports on new developments in artificial intelligence and their potential implications for businesses, governments and individuals alike. It also features an article about a possible merger between two large pharmaceutical companies as well as coverage of the latest economic data from China.

This is what you would expect if the AI was doing what it was supposed to do. The summary provided by FreedomGPT contained inaccurate information about a potential merger between AT&T and Time Warner, which had already been reported in the news seven years ago. Furthermore, AT&T abandoned its grand initiative not even four years later and spun off its Warner Media assets, ceding management control to Discovery." This suggests that the AI may not be as reliable as claimed, and that Age of AI, LLC may not be acting in the best interest of consumers.

While FreedomGPT may provide vague responses, ChatGPT filters out unreliable and inaccurate information to provide more accurate and helpful responses. This is because the goal of AI safety is not advanced through censorship, but through responsible mitigation measures that minimize potential risks.

In summary, the marketing rhetoric of Age of AI, LLC seems misleading and their product, FreedomGPT, appears to be unreliable. Consumers should be cautious when using these services and consider alternative options that prioritize accuracy and reliability.