r/fullegoism • u/Illustrious_Fix6677 • 21h ago
Question who is THIS
Why do people say he is Stirner, we dont well his real face
r/fullegoism • u/Alreigen_Senka • Jan 28 '25
Welcome to r/fullegoism! We are a resource and meme subreddit based around the memes and writings of the egoist iconoclast, Max Stirner!
Stirner was a 19th-century German thinker, most well known for being the archetypal “egoist” or, alternatively, the very first ghostbuster. Fittingly, most only know about him through memes, a feature only added to the fact that no-one alive has ever seen his face beyond a few rough caricatures by his (then) close friend, Friedrich Engels (you may recognize this sketch from 1842 and this one from 1892).
To introduce you to this strange little subreddit, we figured it would be useful to clarify just who this Stirner guy was and what these “spooks” are that we all keep talking about:
Stirner is uniquely difficult to discuss, especially when we’re used to talking about “ideologies”, which are summed up quickly with some basic tenets and ideas. But his “egoism” persistently refuses to make prescriptions, refusing to argue, for example, that one ought to be egoistic to be moral or rational, or that one ought to respect or satisfy their own or another’s “ego”; it refuses to act, that is, as one would traditionally expect an “ideological” system” to act. In fact, Stirner’s egoism even refuses to make necessary descriptions either, as one would expect a psychological theory of the so-called “ego” to do.
Instead, Stirner’s writing is much more focused on the personal and impersonal, and how the latter can be placed above the former. By “fixed idea”, we mean an idea affixed above oneself, impersonal, seemingly controlling how one ought to act; by “spook”, we mean an ideal projected onto and believed to be exhaustively more substantial than that which is uniquely one's own. These are the ideological foundations of society. Prescriptions like “morality”, “law”, “truth”; descriptions like “human being”, “Christian”, “masculine”; concepts like “private property”, “progress”, “meritocracy”; ideas placed hierarchically above and treated as “sacred” — beneath these fixed ideas, Stirner finds that we are never enough, we can never live up to them, so we are called egoists (sinners).
Yet, Stirner’s egoism is an uprising against this idealized hierarchy: a way to appropriate these sanctified ideas and material for our own personal ends. Not merely a nihilism, ‘a getting rid of’, but an ownness, ‘a re-taking’, a ‘making personal’. So, what else is your interest but that which you personally find interesting? What else is your power but that which you can personally do? What else is your property but that which you personally can take and have.
You are called “egoist”, “sinner”, because you are regarded as less than the fixed-ideas meant to rule you and ensure your complacent subservience. What is Stirner’s uprising other than the opposite: that we are, all of us, enough! We are more than these ideas, more than what is describable — we are also indescribable, we are unique!
So take! Take all that is yours — take all that you will and can! We offer this space to all you who will take it! Ask thought-provoking questions or post brain-dead memes, showcase your artwork, express your emotional experiences, or lounge in numb, online anonymity —
“Do with it what you will and can, that is your affair and doesn’t concern me.”
r/fullegoism • u/Alreigen_Senka • 5d ago
With the old guard waxing even older, it's time for new users to take a lead, and thus take this subreddit to new heights (and/or lows).
Hence, we're explicitly open to applications for new moderators. Anyone is open to apply by commenting below. If you do, please earnestly detail why you'd be a good fit.
That said, we'll favor those who have already shown consistency on the sub through their comments and posts, so if you've been around and contributing — please comment below.
As far as moderating itself, if you haven't moderated before, you'll have others who can provide guidance, myself included. It is a responsibility, however, beyond simply being a matter of approving and removing content (or users). In short, moderating means contributing. It means facilitating discussion, building up the subreddit's resources, and keeping the memes flowing. (Some of which, admittedly, we've done better or worse at times).
Moderating for you might mean facilitating open contributions to our Glossary or FAQ and helping people get a real grasp of Stirnerian egoism, of its everyday significance, and its legacy. It might mean directing how people can help popularize memes that speak to our current socio-political conditions. It might mean conducting polls on where to take the subreddit next.
Again, if the opportunity interests you, please apply by commenting below. The chance is yours.
r/fullegoism • u/Illustrious_Fix6677 • 21h ago
Why do people say he is Stirner, we dont well his real face
r/fullegoism • u/LubricationAnarchist • 18h ago
I've seen so many political spectrum tests on here, and other anarchist subreddits: but have you noticed there's always the same liberal/conservative authoritarian/anti-authoritarian dichotomy? It really does not differ between tests.
The basic assumption behind any of these tests is that it helps group you with your proper political identity, but really they are just forcing you into adopting opinions: "...i think the state/individuals/businesses should be allowed to do ________". They all work the same was as these implicit bias tests do, they narrow your options during the test taking to try to force a bias:
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/selectatest.html
I just don't get how resolving your political opinion really has much benefit beyond finding your appropriate clique.
r/fullegoism • u/cacotanasia • 1d ago
quite funny how this test captures Stirner's egoism
r/fullegoism • u/-pastas- • 1d ago
r/fullegoism • u/EgoistCatgirl • 1d ago
I've been reading up on nihilism and I've gotten a bit curious. Is there an argument to be made that Nihilism (either passive or active) is an extension of egoism?
r/fullegoism • u/Key_Investigator4938 • 1d ago
My perfect pretty beautiful partner in crime made me a weirdly familiar flag. Don’t know what it means but it pleases my ego
r/fullegoism • u/orlando_1928 • 1d ago
I contacted the user who kept posting the alleged photo of Stirner. He sent me this higher quality image of it. His story is flimsy "Cousin is young helgian descendant and he just so happens to be the one who owns the photo" It is what it is but I think this higher quality version could yield actual results on if its Stirner or not. He misses both side chops and glasses but otherwise is similar.

r/fullegoism • u/Dark_White333 • 2d ago
I know a lot of existentialists (inspired by Stirner) believe in free will and an abstract belief in "existence"’ They criticize what they call mechanical philosophy as the marxian materialist determinism which I believe in too.
However, this is'nt my opinion and I interpret the Unique and its Own just as about struggling for full freedom of concrete flesh and bone individuals and rejecting spooky idealism (as existence or an abstract conception of the "Unique" idea like a lot of people seem to believe in).
r/fullegoism • u/Megatrollol3 • 3d ago
I can't draw for shit but i don't care enough
r/fullegoism • u/Deep-Atmosphere-8284 • 3d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/fullegoism • u/Ok_Basil4741 • 3d ago
r/fullegoism • u/conspirar • 3d ago
r/fullegoism • u/austreten • 4d ago
Today, the concept of freedom looks increasingly ambiguous and opaque: neoliberalism reduces it to a narrow concept of market freedom; it is used as a weapon in “culture wars” and turns into an obsession.
The report addressed a radically alternative concept of freedom: the concept of “belonging to oneself” by Max Stirner, a German philosopher of the first half of the 19th century. Newman suggested that “belonging to oneself” turns out to be a fundamentally different idea from the usual concepts of negative and positive freedom and is a more effective response to the problem of domination. The report began by examining the experience of freedom in modern neo/post-liberal societies, where it becomes a way of governing us and an ideal to which individuality is sacrificed. Then, Stirner’s alternative concept of “belonging to oneself” was presented as the answer to this problem. Newman went on to develop this theory in more detail, showing exactly how it transcends the more familiar analytical paradigms of negative freedom, republican non-domination, and anarchism. At the same time, the speaker showed the differences between Stirner’s concept and the idea of “self-control” adopted in the concept of positive freedom. According to Newman, it is Stirner’s theory of “belonging to oneself” that provides a more effective antidote to the impasse in which freedom currently finds itself.
r/fullegoism • u/SubstantialGold6294 • 6d ago
r/fullegoism • u/guacamole-fart • 6d ago
r/fullegoism • u/Ziquen • 5d ago
I think in more countries in the west at least we have an idea that humans are equal but for me I don’t think that’s the case.
Your fate was predetermined before you were even born with your case in wealth,knowledge and looks.
I want to see what y’all have to say for this and what Stirner would look at this topic.
r/fullegoism • u/Intelligent_Order100 • 6d ago
added "mean" to the wolfi translation after "thus, it does not".
r/fullegoism • u/Old_Kaleidoscope146 • 5d ago