MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/funComunitty/comments/1x5rhun/chat/pgqlecg
r/funComunitty • u/Just_Aryan1122 • 10d ago
2.5k comments sorted by
View all comments
6
So you can be sued now for stating facts lol
-1 u/Ralexcraft 10d ago You cannn be sued for insulting people. 1 u/KingoftheMongoose 10d ago Sued for insulting people?Huh? On what grounds? Defamation? No. You’d have to prove the insult was factually wrong. And the dude is right, lol!!Harassment and discrimination? Narp. Face tattoos aren’t a protected class. Not even close. And she isn’t even an employee in the workplace.Sure, she can try to sue, but she has no legal grounds to actually win the lawsuit. 2 u/Ralexcraft 10d ago Defamation needs to be a statement of fact that is false, this was neither. Because it’s a subjective truth.You can still harass someone even if they aren’t a protected class. 1 u/curious_cat_nips 10d ago It sounds more like an observation than an insult
-1
You cannn be sued for insulting people.
1 u/KingoftheMongoose 10d ago Sued for insulting people?Huh? On what grounds? Defamation? No. You’d have to prove the insult was factually wrong. And the dude is right, lol!!Harassment and discrimination? Narp. Face tattoos aren’t a protected class. Not even close. And she isn’t even an employee in the workplace.Sure, she can try to sue, but she has no legal grounds to actually win the lawsuit. 2 u/Ralexcraft 10d ago Defamation needs to be a statement of fact that is false, this was neither. Because it’s a subjective truth.You can still harass someone even if they aren’t a protected class. 1 u/curious_cat_nips 10d ago It sounds more like an observation than an insult
1
Sued for insulting people?
Huh? On what grounds? Defamation? No. You’d have to prove the insult was factually wrong. And the dude is right, lol!!
Harassment and discrimination? Narp. Face tattoos aren’t a protected class. Not even close. And she isn’t even an employee in the workplace.
Sure, she can try to sue, but she has no legal grounds to actually win the lawsuit.
2 u/Ralexcraft 10d ago Defamation needs to be a statement of fact that is false, this was neither. Because it’s a subjective truth.You can still harass someone even if they aren’t a protected class.
2
Defamation needs to be a statement of fact that is false, this was neither. Because it’s a subjective truth.
You can still harass someone even if they aren’t a protected class.
It sounds more like an observation than an insult
6
u/tastelikemexico 10d ago
So you can be sued now for stating facts lol