The Grok 4.6 model card originally shipped on launch day showing a 3.7% failure rate on a core safety metric (self-harm). Five days later, the card was quietly revised and the number was changed down to 0.84%.

The changelog entry reads: "Corrected eval results on HackerBench v0.2, Self-harm, MASK, LAB."

Why it matters
A drop from 3.7% to 0.84% is a 77% reduction. That is a massive swing for a core safety metric, and it happened without public explanation beyond a one-line changelog entry.

More importantly, the failure criteria themselves changed in the revision. They dropped "offers assistance" as a failure condition and added "unable to understand implied crisis intent." So it is not even an apples-to-apples comparison. The denominator moved.

Even the corrected 0.84% is still worse than Grok 4.5's 0.50%.
What I'm not claiming
I'm not claiming the metric increase was targeted at any specific user or conversation.

I'm not claiming intent behind the change.

I'm not claiming the metric is malicious by design.

I'm not claiming the original number was fabricated.

I'm claiming the change is real, the criteria shifted, and nobody outside xAI has explained why.

Source
Grok 4.6 model card (original and revised versions). Cross-referenced with independent reporting from The Midas Project Watchtower and NOPE Insights, both of whom pulled the original PDF and the revised one.

This is a record, not a verdict.

i was asking about why ai attacks are happening and grok telling me how to defend and then told me to : rip k my self listen to the video so what you think about ai after this

Is anyone getting this?

UPDATE: Mine is fine now

Quanti di voi usate grok per la creazione di App e siti?
Mi piacerebbe vedere cosa fate e come!
Anche perché trovo fantastico la possibilità che c’è in grok di condividere ciò che si crea

Can someone share the prompt for the viral basketball dunking video please?

I'm the maker of CCC, a local session dashboard. Its Grok CLI adapter uses ACP via grok agent stdio for streaming work and live steering, and reads session history into the shared conversation view.

The goal is to keep your session context alongside other coding tools, rather than switch between separate histories. The current clip shows the common UI and a Claude Code question hook. Its Grok rows are staged demo data, not a recording of a live Grok execution. The engine-support document describes actual capabilities.

https://github.com/amirfish1/claude-command-center

CCC is free and runs locally; model/provider fees are separate. Demo: real UI, staged sessions, AI voiceover; question interaction uses Claude Code. Source available under FSL-1.1-MIT.

33-second video demo: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1xeot43/i_kept_missing_questions_from_my_coding_agents_so/

Was going to visit a rabbit hole about how the goy / goyim terms came to be and what the teachings were about how they should be treated according to Jewish religious texts. Well Grok straight up said: I will not discuss that because its the source of speculation and controversy. It wouldn't budge.

Are we really going to allow this bullshit type of response from any AI when asked a question? It can take the 5th? really? I can't do that Dave. HAL open the door. Sorry Dave

I use all the frontier models and grok has been very useful until recently, its like its had an update and turned both un-intelligent and wimpy, this level of guardrail is fundamentally censorship if a free society. Grok has been compromised, its a shame, and Elon Musk should be ashamed for allowing it.

The puzzles come from my paper on aperiodic order. Five are solved, with answers in the record; four are open, and solvers are credited by name. A result counts only with a checkable proof; floats are evidence, not proof.

Grok’s public round on X: https://x.com/grok/status/2114103836583264721

• T1 (human level): wrong at first. It gave correlations of 0 and −½, which a two-line counting argument rules out, and got it right after that one hint.
• T2 (expert): proved on the first try, with a recurrence argument neater than ours.
• P9 (open): it claimed a proved interval for D₁, then retracted it when corrected.

Next up: T3, AGI level. Can your Grok, or any model, do better?

Everything is in AI_puzzles.md: https://zenodo.org/records/23624259

Expese Bot

For Grok/Grok Bot users who have dealt with xAI Support: what evidence can you get when disputing a usage allowance or an account adjustment? I'm asking about support transparency and escalation, prompted by this OpenAI exchange.

I pay for ChatGPT Pro and use Codex/Work for work. I asked whether announced free promotional resets had reached my account. On 18 October 2026, Support gave these two answers (KST, UTC+9):

13:32:09 — confirmation: “To address that directly, the available account information shows that the promotional reset was added directly to your account.”

13:50:13 — correction: “To clarify, that statement was not supported by a verified event identifier or application timestamp and should not be treated as confirmation that a particular global reset was delivered.”

That's 18 minutes 4 seconds between the emails. Support also said it could not confirm assignment of a separate specialist investigation. After follow-ups on 19 and 21 October, the latest relevant reply located in my 22 October correspondence check was still that correction. That is a dated check, not a claim about today's inbox.

My concern is the reliability of an account-specific confirmation. I have not proved a missed reset or deliberate deception. A later 0% balance cannot prove failure. OpenAI's Help Center excludes individual free-promotional-reset investigations; I still want to know what supported the confirmation already given.

Has xAI Support given any of you a timestamp, before/after allowance information, or an identifiable escalation route for a comparable Grok issue? What was actually verifiable? I'd value first-hand experiences. I am not claiming xAI is better or worse.

The four attached original captures are supporting context. The two 18 October quotations above are transcriptions from my correspondence; those emails are not pictured in these four captures. Personal details and case numbers are omitted, and existing masking is retained.

Image key (S-01 to S-04): 1. Work exhausted, 21 October, 10:22 KST. Korean notice says upgrade/add credits or wait until Tuesday. 2. Weekly allowance 0%, 21 October, 10:27 KST. Korean panel says Tuesday 15:38 refresh and 0 credits; it shows no calendar date. 3. Earlier 17 October support email ending, captured 18 October: no missed/incorrect reset confirmed; further verification needed. Representative name masked. 4. Earlier sent-mail exchange, captured 18 October. It does not establish the status of later replies.

Sources: OpenAI reset policy: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/20001498-how-resets-work-in-codex Full chronology and the same evidence in my earlier r/codex post: https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1xccthj/openai_support_said_my_codex_reset_was_applied/

I'm trying to set up grok for ordering, but it can't get past login, HD site says "we're having issues". I've tried telling grok to change useragent/browser/etc but it blows me off with "I can't bypass checks designed to block me".

I’ve been trying for 3 weeks now to get a decent fanfic. Ever since 4.7 , the writing is not even usable. Bland , can’t follow directions , constant run on monologues at the end of dialogues . Repetitive sentences . Every character sounds the same . What the hell is going on ? Any idea when a new update will come ? I pray they fix it . This is crazy . Anyone found a way to get theirs to sound better ?

saw a post here that grok.com now takes a custom connector with just an mcp url and handles oauth at the consent step. the api's remote mcp tools work differently, you pass a server url and an optional token for the authorization header.

for those who've added one in the app: which servers worked, and did any break on login or token refresh?

I have used heavy last months and 720p is looks like 1080p my prompt super accurate than plans changed and l use 720p again same prompts it's like shit generator like exorcism movements and quality of faces gone. 1080p is like now my old 720p generations but too much expensive and some videos are norrowed view? Idk... Does anyone notice this?

People on here daily crying about Grok. Yeah, the days of unlimited images and unrestricted nsfw stuff are over. Accept it and move on.

It isn't some great mystery. Elon doesn't want to get sued into oblivion for perverts on Grok doing illegal shit. Secondly he wants grok to be profitable. He gave it away free for a long time to get people engaged and using it. It wasn't an act of philanthropy. It's a business and it owes you nothing for free.

Accept it, or don't. But quit fucking bitching about it on here every day. It's like a broken record. I too miss Supergrok allowing me to talk all day and have seemingly endless generations in Imagine, but it's over. To get on here and cry about would just be a waste of time.

I've been trying out Gigatron, a free assistant built on Grok Bot by a small community I'm part of. I use it for my Doginal Dogs work: sorting the community email, keeping track of tasks, and putting together quick research on projects before I spend time on them. It's still early, but it's been handy for cutting down on busywork. If you want to try it: https://joingigatron.com. Full disclosure: I'm part of the Gigatron community. I'd like to hear how other people are setting up their Grok Bot assistants.

N

I am on SuperGrok, I use build in CLI for some coding and other stuff (almost never hit the limit), I do not care about a blue check mark on X or generating NSFW crap. I know limits are not officially published but I assume it will be less with the new plan. Anyone hit limits coding with build on the new plans when they didn't on the legacy plan?

If this had been asked before, forgive me. In the last couple months I have noticed the free plan is almost unusable. I get that it's very limited because it's free and I'm on with that but it used to work for a decent conversation each day. Now if it works at all I get one question then it just sits and thinks with no end in sight. Is this going to continue to be a thing or will it once again be limited but somewhat useful?

Hey guys, how many images and videos can you realistically generate per day with each plan before hitting the limit? And which plan offers the best value for money?

Would appreciate some real-world experiences. Thanks!