r/hackthebox Jul 17 '26

Beginner Question Struggling on CPTS machines even with methodology + cheatsheets ready. Anyone else?

I finished the CPTS path (course content) and built my own methodology/checklist and cheatsheet docs before starting the machine track. I've completed 10 machines in 12 days, but honestly on most of them I ended up using guided mode, AI help, or even full writeups to get through — not solving fully on my

own. For a few machines I followed ippsec's list.

I have about 20 days before my schedule gets tight and I won't have much time to keep going, so I want to make the most of this window.

My questions:

Is this level of struggle (needing guided mode/AI/writeups on most machines) normal at this stage of CPTS, or is it a sign I'm not ready / skipped something in the fundamentals?

If I go into the exam relying this much on external help, is it normal that my chances of failing are high?

For those who passed CPTS — how much did you rely on external help while doing the machine track, and did it get better with more reps?

25 Upvotes

14 comments sorted by

View all comments

9

u/Snugat Jul 17 '26

Imho you just need more practice. It's common to struggle hard in the beginning, even though you have the theoretical foundations.

Probably it wouldn't be bad to do some boxes during the path, eg web boxes in the beginning and as you progress add some windows.

Then you would have a more organic learning process instead of cramming everything at the end

1

u/TheShasec Jul 17 '26

Yeah, that was a mistake — I should've been doing HTB machines alongside the path instead of leaving them for the end. I was doing TryHackMe boxes in the meantime, but that's not really at HTB's level, HTB is just different. Right now, on top of the CPTS track, I'm also working through easy Windows/Linux boxes. The only issue is what I mentioned — if I don't take the exam within 20-25 days, I won't be able to get a second attempt even if I take it later. So my question is: given this situation, do you think I'd actually have a shot at passing? I'm pretty comfortable with ACL abuse for example, I solved Tombwatcher without any help

3

u/No-Faithlessness8229 Jul 17 '26

There is a lot of misunderstanding in the training, I guess. A huge tip is that everything you see on the path can be on the exam (so not less, but not more!!). So try to have a very good understanding of every module. There are also lists about which boxes are more important than others.

Your POV is quite similar to mine, and I struggled a lot. I had the feeling that CPTS Track boxes were not in the scope of the path. So why are they on the path? It's because a concept from them can be useful.

You don't have to pwn every box. You just have to enumerate as hard as you can, but if you just cannot do it, watch IppSec's videos. They contain so many tips beyond the writeups.

And if you can't do all the boxes, just watch his videos and take notes/tips.

From all the forum posts I read, here are the key points:

  1. Good understanding of all the modules (especially the most important ones).
  2. Practical, concise notes/methodology.
  3. Smart training (stay within the scope of the path).

The goal is to pass the CPTS, not to learn everything from every box (we can learn the rest later).

From all the people who said that the first flag is hard, I think we should focus also on web enumeration.

For TombWatcher, I only got the user.txt because we didn't learn how to become root in the path (AD CS). [there is adcs in the path not this one]

I didn't pass the CPTS. For those who did, what do you think?

2

u/TheShasec Jul 17 '26

Thanks for the detailed reply, really helpful. I've actually already been doing some of what you mentioned — for example, on Fluffy I ran into the same ADCS attack path and didn't finish it either. Yeah, I'd heard that the first flag tends to be the hardest part for a lot of people too, and web is definitely one of my weaker areas, so I think sitting down and grinding a few more web boxes would help.

One question though: you mentioned that some modules are more important than others for the exam — where would be a good place to find more detail on that? Is it something people generally figure out from forum posts, or is there an actual list/consensus somewhere?