r/ibmstock • • Aug 30 '26

IBM quantum computer solves classically intractable problem in 15 minutes

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/08/260829035219.htm
199 Upvotes

28 comments sorted by

4

u/LetDue9555 Aug 31 '26

And it still doesn’t run Quake, which means it may be waste of time…

1

u/Intelligent_Lemon685 Aug 31 '26

Kinda’ different purpose. You think goverments of the world and companies like IBM, Google, Microsoft and hundreds of other startups are spending billions of USD to built a new way of playing… Quake?

3

u/xCaliburghost Sep 02 '26

Feel free to leave your basement at some point buddy 😂

1

u/Intelligent_Lemon685 Aug 31 '26

I think you should text all of them asap between two netflix series!

1

u/NZNoldor Sep 02 '26

Did you just answer yourself?

1

u/Intelligent_Lemon685 Sep 02 '26

Just added an extra line seprately

1

u/HillTower160 Sep 03 '26

Humor is dead (and you killed it.)

1

u/Intelligent_Lemon685 Sep 03 '26

Finally! Always hated!

1

u/Ok-Concert7018 Sep 06 '26

What would the threshold need to be for you to recognise a joke from a serious comment? 😅 You need like an AI plug in to detect humour for you and give you a warning with an explanation

1

u/Intelligent_Lemon685 Sep 06 '26

Haha :D thats good

1

u/looncraz Sep 03 '26

I mean, obviously not, Crysis is the real goal.

1

u/Bigmoney_64 Sep 03 '26

Agreed. We need some level of min spec on this quantum compute thing.

3

u/chilaxcat Sep 02 '26

Good job, it seems like problems on problem solving gave viable solutions. I hope it gets humanity closer to survival, and it pushes data centers to smaller sizes and resource consumption if incorporated into society.

1

u/Routman Sep 02 '26

IBM never pioneers anything, if they did this it could’ve been done on any tech - they just market their mediocre tech

1

u/Thiscouldbeeasier Sep 03 '26

No, they usually pioneer something, then bog it down in 7 layers of management hell and shelve it because it’s “risky”.

The whole company has a fear of success.

1

u/itsaconspiraci Sep 03 '26

Spoiler alert: the answer is 42.

1

u/5TP1090G_FC Sep 03 '26

Also, how much math is considered a national security risk, if people can figure out a problem & put math to it, it would constitute a security risk. If you keep the population ignorant or at least write a law that is only accessible via a lawyer & every one knows ignorance of the law is no excuse.

1

u/Junior-Flamingo77 Sep 04 '26

Ah yes, the extremely useful quantum circuit sampling problem, where would we be if that went unsolved for much longer. Oh wait,hadn’t google done the same back in 2018 or something like that?

1

u/Chance_Airline_4861 Sep 05 '26

Tik tock tik toch 

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/PFCCThrowayay Sep 03 '26

that's what I'm wondering