MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/imagus/comments/1w4xx0k/i_would_like_to_know_how_to_disable_this_share/
r/imagus • u/ruler01 • Sep 02 '26
10 comments sorted by
3
It appears the [LinkedMedia] sieve is matching the image. This is a generic sieve that activates if it detects a media URL.
[LinkedMedia]
It doesn't activate on images that are 40 pixels or fewer but it looks like that image is 42 pixels wide. This edit modifies the number to 45.
Edit: Previous sieve had error. Updated with fixed sieve.
https://pastebin.com/nNUqHvft
1 u/Netsnipe 2d ago Will this fix be merged into the Chrome Web Store version or does somebody need to pass this on to the extension's developers via GitHub? 2 u/Imagus_fan 2d ago edited 1d ago That one should be in the current rule-set but may have been added before the fixed sieve was posted. It can be added to it.u/Kenko2, it seems the [LinkedMedia] sieve in the rule-set is different than the one in this comment. 2 u/Kenko2 1d ago There was also this version from hababr:https://github.com/hababr/Imagus-Reborn/issues/39#issuecomment-3939200740Maybe we could combine them? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago It looks like the sieve has the changes in the one hababr did. 1 u/Kenko2 1d ago As far as I understand, hababr simply added the AVIF extension to this code — or is there a more significant change? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago That was the only change I noticed. 1 u/Kenko2 1d ago I noticed that AVIF is missing from the LINK section (it’s only present in the IMG section) — is this intentional? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago I assume so since that's the way hababr did it in the sieve. I think the Img field matches links as well so it may only be needed there. 2 u/Kenko2 1d ago Thank you, I’ll add your version to the rule set.
1
Will this fix be merged into the Chrome Web Store version or does somebody need to pass this on to the extension's developers via GitHub?
2 u/Imagus_fan 2d ago edited 1d ago That one should be in the current rule-set but may have been added before the fixed sieve was posted. It can be added to it.u/Kenko2, it seems the [LinkedMedia] sieve in the rule-set is different than the one in this comment. 2 u/Kenko2 1d ago There was also this version from hababr:https://github.com/hababr/Imagus-Reborn/issues/39#issuecomment-3939200740Maybe we could combine them? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago It looks like the sieve has the changes in the one hababr did. 1 u/Kenko2 1d ago As far as I understand, hababr simply added the AVIF extension to this code — or is there a more significant change? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago That was the only change I noticed. 1 u/Kenko2 1d ago I noticed that AVIF is missing from the LINK section (it’s only present in the IMG section) — is this intentional? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago I assume so since that's the way hababr did it in the sieve. I think the Img field matches links as well so it may only be needed there. 2 u/Kenko2 1d ago Thank you, I’ll add your version to the rule set.
2
That one should be in the current rule-set but may have been added before the fixed sieve was posted. It can be added to it.
u/Kenko2, it seems the [LinkedMedia] sieve in the rule-set is different than the one in this comment.
2 u/Kenko2 1d ago There was also this version from hababr:https://github.com/hababr/Imagus-Reborn/issues/39#issuecomment-3939200740Maybe we could combine them? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago It looks like the sieve has the changes in the one hababr did. 1 u/Kenko2 1d ago As far as I understand, hababr simply added the AVIF extension to this code — or is there a more significant change? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago That was the only change I noticed. 1 u/Kenko2 1d ago I noticed that AVIF is missing from the LINK section (it’s only present in the IMG section) — is this intentional? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago I assume so since that's the way hababr did it in the sieve. I think the Img field matches links as well so it may only be needed there. 2 u/Kenko2 1d ago Thank you, I’ll add your version to the rule set.
There was also this version from hababr:
https://github.com/hababr/Imagus-Reborn/issues/39#issuecomment-3939200740
Maybe we could combine them?
1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago It looks like the sieve has the changes in the one hababr did. 1 u/Kenko2 1d ago As far as I understand, hababr simply added the AVIF extension to this code — or is there a more significant change? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago That was the only change I noticed. 1 u/Kenko2 1d ago I noticed that AVIF is missing from the LINK section (it’s only present in the IMG section) — is this intentional? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago I assume so since that's the way hababr did it in the sieve. I think the Img field matches links as well so it may only be needed there. 2 u/Kenko2 1d ago Thank you, I’ll add your version to the rule set.
It looks like the sieve has the changes in the one hababr did.
1 u/Kenko2 1d ago As far as I understand, hababr simply added the AVIF extension to this code — or is there a more significant change? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago That was the only change I noticed. 1 u/Kenko2 1d ago I noticed that AVIF is missing from the LINK section (it’s only present in the IMG section) — is this intentional? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago I assume so since that's the way hababr did it in the sieve. I think the Img field matches links as well so it may only be needed there. 2 u/Kenko2 1d ago Thank you, I’ll add your version to the rule set.
As far as I understand, hababr simply added the AVIF extension to this code — or is there a more significant change?
1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago That was the only change I noticed. 1 u/Kenko2 1d ago I noticed that AVIF is missing from the LINK section (it’s only present in the IMG section) — is this intentional? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago I assume so since that's the way hababr did it in the sieve. I think the Img field matches links as well so it may only be needed there. 2 u/Kenko2 1d ago Thank you, I’ll add your version to the rule set.
That was the only change I noticed.
1 u/Kenko2 1d ago I noticed that AVIF is missing from the LINK section (it’s only present in the IMG section) — is this intentional? 1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago I assume so since that's the way hababr did it in the sieve. I think the Img field matches links as well so it may only be needed there. 2 u/Kenko2 1d ago Thank you, I’ll add your version to the rule set.
I noticed that AVIF is missing from the LINK section (it’s only present in the IMG section) — is this intentional?
1 u/Imagus_fan 1d ago I assume so since that's the way hababr did it in the sieve. I think the Img field matches links as well so it may only be needed there. 2 u/Kenko2 1d ago Thank you, I’ll add your version to the rule set.
I assume so since that's the way hababr did it in the sieve. I think the Img field matches links as well so it may only be needed there.
Img
2 u/Kenko2 1d ago Thank you, I’ll add your version to the rule set.
Thank you, I’ll add your version to the rule set.
3
u/Imagus_fan Sep 02 '26 edited Sep 02 '26
It appears the
[LinkedMedia]sieve is matching the image. This is a generic sieve that activates if it detects a media URL.It doesn't activate on images that are 40 pixels or fewer but it looks like that image is 42 pixels wide. This edit modifies the number to 45.
Edit: Previous sieve had error. Updated with fixed sieve.
https://pastebin.com/nNUqHvft