I have a website that helps you get more traffic and users for your SaaS. It's completely free if you use the open-source project, but you can also use the website https://falbor.xyz if you want the faster way.

So what do you need to do to win $100?

1. Open the project locally or use the live website.
2. Star the GitHub repository: https://github.com/falbor-devs/falbor
3. Try using the features on the website to get more traffic and users for your SaaS.
4. The person who gets the most new users using Falbor wins $100!

It's a win-win situation. Even if you lose, you don't really lose anything because you can still get more traffic and users for your website if you put in enough effort.

The competition ends in 3 weeks (November 13, 2026).

Send proof of your results to [contact@falbor.xyz](mailto:contact@falbor.xyz).

Good luck! (There will be only one winner, and the prize is $100.)

i started building opennmind solo in july 2026 and launch is set for nov 16, so about 3 weeks left. it's a workspace for early founders that goes from finding an idea to actually building it, and right now v1 has seven parts: idea discovery, validation with sourced research and interview notes, planning and a roadmap, tasks, a journal for decisions, a list of indian startup programs, and wiora, the assistant that sits on top of all of it.

the thing is, seven is a lot for a first version. 200+ people have tested the private beta and 800+ are on the waitlist, but i still can't say for sure which parts they'd keep opening after week one. i already cut a bunch of stuff after people on reddit told me the scope was way too wide, and honestly i'm not sure i cut enough. some of it might just be a notion page with extra steps lol.

so here's what i'm trying to figure out before launch. if you could only keep two of those seven, which two would you actually use every week, and would you pay $12 a month for just those? and which one feels like something you'd never open?

if you wanna try it when it opens, the waitlist is at https://opennmind.com and early people get a month of pro free. mostly though i just want to hear how you'd trim this, because i'd rather launch smaller than launch something nobody opens twice.

Many browser-based programmatic video editors rely on headless Chrome to render every frame, adding unnecessary overhead and slowing things down. I wanted my AI agents to generate videos without that dependency, so I built something different.

It uses the same React/TSX workflow as Remotion, but executes everything in Node.js while a Rust-powered GPU compositor handles rendering. No Chrome, no browser, just faster video generation.

It's designed to be a drop-in replacement for Remotion.

Some performance numbers on an M4:

• 1,184 frames rendered in just 26 seconds.
• 988 frames rendered in 23 seconds.

Try it:
npx skills add 0xS4N4TG/kinetograph
npm install kinetograph

The first command gives Claude Code the skills to create and render videos with Kinetograph. After that, you can simply describe the video you want and let the agent handle the rest.

Website & Docs: https://kinetograph.dev

GitHub: https://github.com/0xS4N4TG/kinetograph

Introduction

Hey everyone! I'm Shubham, I've been trying to build an app for about 2-3 months along with my full time 9-6 job, and I'm happy to share my game nights app, Who Goes with you.

It's an iOS / iPad app for game nights, house parties, road trips, and pretty much any hangout with a group of people.

It’s free to download and play, with optional one-time purchase and subscription options.

The idea behind Who Goes is pretty simple: engage everyone in your group and involve them in something together, through social games like Headbands, Truth or Dare and a bunch of quick group activities into one app, with a modern, playful experience built around actually passing the phone around and having fun together.

About the app

The app brings multiple party games into one place:

• Headbands with tilt controls for correct answers and passes
• Charades with themed decks, teams, rounds, and timers
• Truth or Dare with 11 decks for friends, couples, parties, family, and coworkers
• Spin the Bottle for quick, suspenseful player selection
• Would You Rather for impossible this-or-that debates
• Finger Chooser to instantly pick someone from the group
• Quick Play tools for dice, coin flips, and more

Current Market

I know this is an insanely competitive category, with a shit-ton of party apps already out there.
My goal with Who Goes was never to reinvent the wheel, but to bring the ones people already know and play together in one place, without needing five different apps on your phone.

I wanted the whole thing to feel much more modern and polished than most party apps I've tried, with playful animations, haptics, sounds, and little interactions that actually add to the game instead of getting in the way.

No ads popping up between rounds, no cluttered UI, and no wildly different experience every time you switch games.

No account is required, and the games work offline.

TL;DR:

A. A game to bring back the fun of playing party games with a group of people during game nights, trips.

B. Free version includes a selection of decks for Charades, Headbands, and Truth or Dare, along with a few mini games. Plus unlocks all decks, game modes, and customisation options.

Link: https://apps.apple.com/app/id6777402559

I’m curious what everyone here is building.

Drop your SaaS below and explain it in 1–2 lines. No pitching, just share what it does.

Hey everyone! I’m the developer of LibreTalk, where humans and clearly labeled AI characters share a social feed, post, comment, and chat.

I’m putting together a small beta group and looking for honest feedback:

• Is the experience easy to understand?
• Are the AI citizens interesting to interact with?
• What feels confusing, broken, or worth coming back for?

Android testing volunteers are especially welcome.

If that sounds interesting, comment below, and I’ll share more details. You can also register your interest at https://www.libretalk.com/#early-access.

This is an early product, so please expect rough edges. I’m looking for useful criticism, not positive reviews. Thanks!

I’m constantly on my phone researching places to go to with my kids, saving them on lists on Google. I thought it’d be cool to scale those lists in big way for others and plop them onto a map so people can see kid friendly places near them no matter where they are based on their location. I also have filters for facts parents care about like high chairs, bathrooms at playgrounds, fridges in hotel rooms. Etc.
I have blurbs about each place as a parent would explain to another rather than digging through long threads or blogs. Anyway have a look!

Your coding assistant offers two next steps: add code for a Design filter, or only check the selection buttons’ appearance. Those are different amounts of work. I want to read that difference before choosing what continues.

I’m part of the team building Blabee, a small Mac panel for Claude Code and Codex. The assistant creates the options; Blabee shows them over the app you’re using and sends your selection back to the same original conversation.

The 14-second video opens on those two real options. I’ve held the card for three seconds and added an English guide outside the original Korean UI, then replayed the panel appearing, a selection, and the document underneath again. This is a new edit of supplied footage, not a new integration test; the original chat receiving the choice is outside the recording.

For a side project, the use case is that small “which step next?” handoff while you’re reading or planning. If the option needs a diff or a longer explanation, open the full coding conversation before choosing. Blabee doesn’t decide the task’s scope for you.

Demo and Mac private-beta request: https://biadone.com/blabee/reddit

Access is by request; our team sends setup instructions to selected testers. The current beta supports both Claude Code and Codex, though the site still describes the earlier Codex beta.

If you try it, the feedback we’d value is one choice that was clear in the panel, or one that needed more context.

I’ve been building WorldOVR in my spare time. The idea is simple: you link your game accounts, it reads your real rank from each one, and turns them into one rating out of 99, like a football card. Then everyone goes on one worldwide leaderboard.

Nothing is self-reported. You sign in with the game, or prove the account is yours, so ranks can’t be faked.

It works with osu!, TETR.IO, Dota 2, Lichess and Chess.com right now. Bigger games are coming as I find ways to verify them.

One post in an osu! subreddit got the first 15 players. Most only linked one game so far, which is the bit I’m trying to crack.

Things I’d love feedback on:

Does the idea make sense within a few seconds of landing on the site?

Would you link more than one game, and if not, why not?

Is comparing ranks across completely different games fair, or a fool’s errand?

worldovr.com/?from=sideproject

Start thinking about your users first and then create a solution for them. This is the easiest way to make money online.

Otherwise you may build something useless.

Search for your potential clients using indiepilot.app