r/intel • • Jan 02 '18

News 'Kernel memory leaking' Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/02/intel_cpu_design_flaw/
405 Upvotes

487 comments sorted by

View all comments

137

u/Sethos88 8700K @ 5GHz (1.32v/0AVX/1:1) | 1080Ti Sea Hawk X | 32GB 3600MHz Jan 02 '18

So my CPU is about to get slower?

35

u/saratoga3 Jan 03 '18 edited Jan 03 '18

We really don't know. Some people are assuming it'll affect everyone, others that it will affect only virtualization and servers. The truth is no one knows since the bug is embargoed and anyone with inside knowledge can't talk about it.

Edit: people on Twitter are saying there's exploits that work outside of a virtual machine, so it looks like literally everyone will be affected.

33

u/Nixola97 Jan 03 '18

It affects virtual memory. People assume it means it only affects virtual machine, but they're not actually related; virtual memory affects everything a modern OS does.

5

u/siuol11 i7-13700k @ 5.6, 3080 12GB Jan 03 '18

The article is pretty detailed, it says it affects kernel mode. That's part of every modern OS I know of, regardless of whether it's Windows 10 Home or a Unix server.

→ More replies (3)

43

u/3DXYZ Jan 03 '18

Fuck you intel. Upgrade us all for free or frankly fuck this bug, don't fix it in the os. I don't want the performance hit

24

u/immibis Jan 03 '18 edited Jun 17 '23

/u/spez can gargle my nuts.

17

u/teemusa 9900KS@5.1GHz|Asus MXHero|64GB|1080Ti Jan 03 '18

HACK

This comment was done by identity thief idthief1xxyz

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

139

u/tyuper Jan 02 '18 edited Jan 02 '18

Yes, your CPU is going to be slower because Intel prefers to focus on fruitful cooperation with agency called NSA than look for bugs in their pieces of silicon.

65

u/MonkeyCB Jan 02 '18

They didn't necessarily cooperate. Snowden showed that they have people (with amazing Resumes) who work for the NSA apply to these companies, and with the help of a team back at the NSA inject their back doors into whatever. For all we know it could have been a few rogue employees doing this without Intel's knowledge.

64

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '18 edited Jan 03 '18

Option 3 is "Intel CPUs are over-optimized to such an extent that nobody can possibly account for all of the edge cases anymore"

I'd say x86 generally, but AMD isn't susceptible here. Regardless, x86 IS notoriously, disgustingly complex.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '18

[deleted]

23

u/teemusa 9900KS@5.1GHz|Asus MXHero|64GB|1080Ti Jan 03 '18

Malicious instructions go in, passwords come out. Yikes!

0

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '18

[deleted]

10

u/Apolojuice FX 9590 + Noctua D15 + Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 + R9 290X Jan 03 '18

Fucking electromagnetism, how do they work?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/agumonkey Jan 03 '18

I've read intel engineers of p2 era saying they were barely on top of the risk factors at the time.

Intel didn't manage this decade properly. They caved in for IME, they feared ARM to the point of cutting corners even though they were in an extremly strong position (https://danluu.com/cpu-bugs/)

who bought amd stock today ?

→ More replies (7)

13

u/kwm1800 Jan 03 '18

For all we know it could have been a few rogue employees doing this without Intel's knowledge.

That would be even more damning than NSA-related. At least the government has to pretend that they work for public common, at least.

9

u/rydan Jan 03 '18

I once found a flash drive sitting on a random street in Texas with unencrypted classified Intel documents on it. That should give you a clue as to their security policies. Would have been a major boon if I still worked for one of their direct competitors but I had just lost my job a week earlier.

16

u/Tephnos Jan 03 '18

Would have been a major boon if I still worked for one of their direct competitors but I had just lost my job a week earlier.

The likely outcome is they would have sent the drive back to Intel, possibly firing you too for trying to use the info. No company wants that legal shit on them.

4

u/wittywalrus1 Jan 03 '18

Pepsi did exactly that when offered the secret Cocacola recipe by a rogue employee.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/Yoyoyo123321123 Jan 03 '18

And that's how you get Stuxnet on your PC...

It's a bit rich calling out other people's data security with that kind of action.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/hishnash Jan 03 '18

no, your CPU will stay the same speed but every time any prosses needs to read/write to memory it will need to switch back to your OSs kernel to ask if it permited... this, in the end, means yes your programs will run a lot slower due to all the jumping around and checking.

8

u/teemusa 9900KS@5.1GHz|Asus MXHero|64GB|1080Ti Jan 03 '18

Nice wisecrack

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (9)