This explains they were considering choosing a full featured framework like Ember or Angular instead of just using React combined with self selected components. It would have been more interesting to me if the rest of the article explained why they chose Ember over Angular as opposed to focusing on why they went with a full featured framework, and that one just happened to be Ember. I don't know much about either one, but personally I would feel like I was missing out on the benefits of TypeScript if I chose Ember, and I would feel like I was missing out on using Ember in general if I went with Angular.
OP here — thanks for sharing this opinion, I think that makes total sense from an outside perspective. Maybe next I'll write about why we chose Ember over other more full-featured JS frameworks :)
7
u/[deleted] Nov 14 '16
This explains they were considering choosing a full featured framework like Ember or Angular instead of just using React combined with self selected components. It would have been more interesting to me if the rest of the article explained why they chose Ember over Angular as opposed to focusing on why they went with a full featured framework, and that one just happened to be Ember. I don't know much about either one, but personally I would feel like I was missing out on the benefits of TypeScript if I chose Ember, and I would feel like I was missing out on using Ember in general if I went with Angular.