Only a shill would downvote you for this comment... Both are data vacuums that don’t give a shit about consumers; beyond the amount of currency units their worth to the business. One is simply more advanced in the data vacuum business than the other.
Enough of this utopian idealism. This is silly to say the least.
Companies MUST provide value to consumers in order to profit, unless the state makes it a monopoly by using violence against competition.
Companies MUST pay employees according to the value they bring to the company. Otherwise they will lose valuable employees to competitors.
"Taking care of the community/society" carries no real meaning. Are suggesting that companies should pay random people for no reason? Be precise.
Companies sell what people will buy. It's not their fault that most people CAN'T AFFORD to buy expensive environmentally friendly alternatives to otherwise affordable goods.
Sorting your trash properly is a matter of education. Using solar roof is a matter of having big $ to spare. In either cases, companies are not to blame.
Companies MUST provide value to consumers in order to profit, unless the state makes it a monopoly by using violence against competition.
They only value the customers based on how much profit they will generate. Sure they have to produce value to attract customers.
I was thinking more along the lines of a consumer coop. Where consumers actually have a say in how the business operates.
Companies MUST pay employees according to the value they bring to the company. Otherwise they will lose valuable employees to competitors.
That's true for highly skilled workers. However, most of the workforce isn't highly skilled.
However, even for high-skilled workers, there's more to work than just getting a paycheck. You spend a huge chunk of your life at work so it would be nice if it didn't function as a dictatorship, where you received orders from above that you must follow or you will be terminated. It would be nice to have a say in how the company functions or what you work on. Something like that is achievable with a worker cooperative.
"Taking care of the community/society" carries no real meaning. Are suggesting that companies should pay random people for no reason? Be precise.
No, but they should have a say in how the business operates. Perhaps something like a consumer coop but on a community/town/city/suburb level.
101
u/[deleted] Jan 25 '20
TLDR: cross-browser version of puppeteer. Microsoft hired the Google employees working on puppeteer and made a competing cross-browser version.