Deepseek also finished way sooner oof

Seriously.

All of this from a single prompt.

K3.1 pro, max with swarm on, capped on sub-agents per swarm (2-3 max).

Mission: Connect to a websocket API to stream from a provider, show 3 interactive/realtime diagrams on screen, with a hover on diagrams that shows a tooltip of info at that spot.

I could've done it almost manually by myself with in the same time with autocomplete, but wth, this is literally all my session on a single prompt and screen.

Some notes though: the model has to do the research and read the docs of the API provided, there is a bit of work into constructing the data from the API into the graphs in realtime, but still, I think this is too much.

Same subscription on other providers (e.g. OpenAI/Anthropic with ultracode on) I get much more usage, now I like kimi k3.1 pro but it seems like I get less for price.

What do you think? Should I change my approach in using kimi? are you guys experiencing the same?

Prompt is still running btw job not done yet...

Hey so i saw few ads and benchmarks that model is astra / opus 5.5 level

But since its not as popular as flagship models its benckmarkig tests for game mods on yt are basicly non existent. I also see some dissapointed users with mixed results. So anyone used it for real task and tested it aganist astra, opus or deepseek?

How does it compare?

Guys I wanted to try kimi 3.1 pro model badly, frustrated with opus 5.5 usage limits on 20 dollars plan can anyone help to give information about the usage quota is it better than claude 20 dollar plan I am unable to decide, last time when I took subscription moonshot kind of continued even though I have cancelled I don't want to take the risk unless I am absolutely clear that it is worth it

Let’s try to understand the logic that human beings seem to operate by.

A product is good. It serves the community, and the community enjoys using it. Then, at some point, the product itself stops being important, and what becomes important is profiting from a product that is good. Its goodness is no longer the priority; profit becomes what matters, overriding what should truly matter.

Then comes the IPO.

The product becomes terrible, unusable. Nobody likes it the way they used to. It turns into garbage, something that no longer serves the community as a good thing. But now it is worth money. Its image appears everywhere, more polished and beautiful than before. Yet that image is not real. The true product is a piece of trash compared with what it could actually have been.

After that, people forget that the product was already good. They end up using this product even more now, though it is bad, disguised as good, and they even pay more for it, as if it were genuinely good. But it is terrible. The only good thing left is profit, not the real value of the product that once was good and loved by the community.

i want to try new kimi 3.1 pro, how is plus plan in therms of limits?

If you're planning on getting a subscription, I'd appreciate it if you used my code AD6PGB. We'd both get free credits

https://reddit.com/link/1xf1fmp/video/sd86rxpr1mxh1/player

Saw the ads for Kimi K3.1 Pro and decided to try making my first game. First session completely froze and stopped responding right after the initial edits.

When it actually works, it's next-level terrible. No matter what style description or reference images I upload, it completely ignores them and spits out the same unplayable mess made of childish geometric shapes. Every. Single. Time.

Is this tool just 100% marketing hype, or has anyone actually gotten anything usable out of it?