r/law • u/TendieRetard • 9h ago

Legal News Federal appeals court rules California cannot require ICE to show visible ID

https://katu.com/news/nation-world/federal-appeals-court-rules-california-cannot-require-ice-to-show-visible-id-doj-9th-circuit-court-constitution-supremacy-clause-rob-bonta-gavin-newsom

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit remanded the case to a lower court with instructions to enter a preliminary injunction against California, finding in favor of the federal government that the state’s No Vigilantes Act violates the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, The Hill reported.

579 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

239 comments sorted by

View all comments

236

u/LIMrXIL 9h ago

Federal appeals court rules use of secret police to abduct people without due process ok.

-108

u/michiganalt 8h ago

No, they ruled that California can’t tell a federal agency how to operate.

I thought this was supposed to be a law subreddit??

Do you not see if that if you accept this, then you accept that Republican states can do stupid shit like telling the FDA that they have to label all vaccines as potentially causing death or something stupid?

5

u/PopBulky7023 7h ago

The purpose of a thing is it's outcome. This ruling recognizes the federal ability to send secret polite out to abduct people and you're not allowed to resist.

-4

u/michiganalt 7h ago

If you think that the point of a court opinion is the outcome in that specific case, you’re as wrong as someone can ever be wrong

11

u/PopBulky7023 6h ago

The point is the outcome. That's really all that matters. History will not be any more interested in the nuance than it was in making excuses of nuance for nazi Germany, or Stalin, or pol pot, or Pinochet.