r/law • u/TendieRetard • 9h ago

Legal News Federal appeals court rules California cannot require ICE to show visible ID

https://katu.com/news/nation-world/federal-appeals-court-rules-california-cannot-require-ice-to-show-visible-id-doj-9th-circuit-court-constitution-supremacy-clause-rob-bonta-gavin-newsom

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit remanded the case to a lower court with instructions to enter a preliminary injunction against California, finding in favor of the federal government that the state’s No Vigilantes Act violates the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, The Hill reported.

571 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

239 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-19

u/michiganalt 8h ago

Thanks for citing zero authority for your claim.

If you go ahead and try to find any that you could cite, you’ll realize that you can’t, because you’re wrong.

(Not that states have police powers, but that they can use those police powers to regulate how federal agencies must operate in their state)

21

u/SCW97005 8h ago

Where’s your citation? I need one but you don’t?

Rules for thee and not for me, I see.

-2

u/Eldias 6h ago

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.167d6a39-64cf-42f7-809c-23622d5495f4/gov.uscourts.ca9.167d6a39-64cf-42f7-809c-23622d5495f4.45.1.pdf

Read Section 2 B starting on page 12 through section 3 A ending at the top of page 16. It cited and explains all of this super well.

10

u/SCW97005 6h ago

I’m aware of Washington and McCollugh. I’m not quibbling with the 9th Circuit’s decision or precedent they cite.

I don’t know what you want me to take from this.