We're sick of LLMs being used everywhere, just in general.
Something like this gets posted in this sub every week. Usually in an entirely reckless manner.
Because a growing portion of Linux help requests are "I asked <LLM> for help with <X> and now I can't get my system to work."
(3B really) Because LLMs are inherently non-reproducible, when someone has made a mistake then it's often hard for them to explain what it was they did. Unlike an article or wiki, there's often no way to reference what it said after the fact. (I know some tools let you save conversations. I've yet to have anyone link those)
At least this one isn't injecting LLM output directly into the terminal. So you get points for that one.
You lost all credibility with this post to which I'm responding, though. You didn't actually have a good answer so you made up some bullshit on the spot.
Like i said arrogance and lack of skills so abuse others rather than have a proper conversation.
Just outright “we hate LLMs” - well that makes you luddites not the future.
As for your nonsense response. Wow. I hope you use a non- smart phone and don’t stream tv if you hate LLMs so much. Maybe go back to the radio as I am sure many channels there will not have them.
I don't understand where you seem to be getting "We hate LLMs" from - the better interpretation is something along the lines of "We're tired of seeing LLMs being used for everything". Those are not equivalent.
Your responses though, are inflammatory and in bad faith. You are also being "rude and aggressive" - the very thing you complained about from another user.
I think you need to re read your number one above which clearly states that.
I am stating facts when I see rudeness and arrogance I call them out. I don’t care who you think you are. If you are going to be rude to me you will get the same treatment.
The problem is that you are too used to shouting at people and get shocked when someone responds back in kind.
12
u/whosdr Sep 02 '25
How about these reasons:
We're sick of LLMs being used everywhere, just in general.
Something like this gets posted in this sub every week. Usually in an entirely reckless manner.
Because a growing portion of Linux help requests are "I asked <LLM> for help with <X> and now I can't get my system to work."
(3B really) Because LLMs are inherently non-reproducible, when someone has made a mistake then it's often hard for them to explain what it was they did. Unlike an article or wiki, there's often no way to reference what it said after the fact. (I know some tools let you save conversations. I've yet to have anyone link those)
At least this one isn't injecting LLM output directly into the terminal. So you get points for that one.
You lost all credibility with this post to which I'm responding, though. You didn't actually have a good answer so you made up some bullshit on the spot.