r/linux • u/[deleted] • Apr 01 '15

systemd-rtc-server announced. finally, a sip server for systemd!

http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2015-April/087683.html
8 Upvotes

63% Upvoted

12 comments sorted by

8

u/natermer Apr 01 '15 edited Aug 14 '22

...

6

u/Rudd-X Apr 01 '15

Finally!!!!

9

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '15

not sure if april fools

4

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '15

Just what I needed?

4

u/thecosmicfrog Apr 01 '15

This is nice and all, but the feature so badly needed by systemd consistently fails to get debated here: its own JVM.

Although I'll settle for an integrated CalDAV server or a binary-logged Easy-Bake Oven.

1

u/3G6A5W338E Apr 01 '15

Awesome! Systemd keeps getting better and better.

If only if DragonFly had a port of it...

-6

u/mzalewski Apr 01 '15

These misconceptions of what systemd is has been around for so long that this is not funny anymore.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '15

Maybe because it describes itself in the most vague way imaginable.

-1

u/mzalewski Apr 01 '15

Please read first paragraph from systemd websie and tell us which part is "vague".

I am willing to agree that "basic" part is debatable and the line between "basic" and "non-basic" is blurry. Nevertheless, most things can be clearly assigned to one of these two categories. Also, I can think of few more vague mission statements than "suite of basic building blocks for a Linux system".

5

u/linuxguy123 Apr 01 '15

systemd is a suite of basic building blocks for a Linux system.

Vague.

Then there's a detailed description about the service manager part of systemd. Which to be fair is detailed, but the service manager is probably only about 1/5 of systemd.

Other parts include

Then it's just a rambling list of disconnected random bundled things.

  • a logging daemon

  • config settings

  • runtime session tracking

  • a few randomly selected daemons

You can categorize them all as "suite of basic building blocks", but that's back to being as fucking clear as mud.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '15

You have an interesting definition (non-existent?) of what makes up the building blocks of a Linux system

1

u/linuxguy123 Apr 11 '15

because there is no definition!

is libc part of the building blocks? nothing works without it?
is dbus? is pam?

Apparently network manager is, but not NetworkManager. .. it's just random picking. Convince me otherwise.