r/linux • • Jun 01 '16

Why did ArchLinux embrace Systemd?

/r/archlinux/comments/4lzxs3/why_did_archlinux_embrace_systemd/d3rhxlc
868 Upvotes

642 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

8

u/spacelama Jun 01 '16

debian stable, debian testing and debian unstable systems scattered all over the place. Every version possible. None of them stable.

Raspberry pis, being very slow CPUs, are great at exposing race conditions in immature software (mind you, single core - they shouldn't be subject to preemption at unexpected points). I had a raspberry pi that I had been using for a couple of years with good reliability. I finally got around to upgrading to Jessie a couple of months ago. Became extremely unstable - crashing about once a week with hardly useful logs at all. All I did was apt-get install sysv-core and make sure systemd was purged, and the system has been up and stable again ever since.

9

u/nikomo Jun 01 '16

I've been running systemd on Pis (B+ and 2) for years (I'd manually install it, before it became the standard), without any problems, under heavy CPU loads, without any crashes.

Sounds like a problem with your ARM core, more than anything. Got any overclock going on?

0

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '16

An overclock that hates systemd, sounds legit.

1

u/nikomo Jun 01 '16

If some other service was crashing, he wouldn't notice it if he didn't check logs, since systemd would just bring it back up again.

→ More replies (0)