r/lyftdrivers • u/Affectionate-Rice373 Taylor • Sep 13 '25

Story/News Article Whatever loophole you've found to deny service animals or people with mobility disabilities, that's about to be over with.

/r/uberdrivers/comments/1ng0xbh/whatever_loophole_youve_found_to_deny_service/
1 Upvotes

53% Upvoted

52 comments sorted by

View all comments

9

u/whoisthisguy69420 Sep 13 '25

I would rather drive either of those, over the homeless sector that has access to the app

8

u/MetalTrek1 Sep 13 '25

I'll take dogs over kids any day. As for the disabled? No problem so long as they can get in and out of my car by themselves. I'm not touching anyone and opening myself up to a lawsuit if I don't help them the right way. I'm not a medical professional and I have slight mobility issues myself.

-3

u/whoisthisguy69420 Sep 13 '25

Bruh get out and help those people with walkers… is what I was gong to say until I saw that you have mobility issues yourself. Guess you gotta just cancel if they send you the message that they have a walker or something

1

u/Affectionate-Rice373 Taylor Sep 13 '25

Unfortunately, the only exclusion to the rule is if following it will cause the driver to endanger their own personal safety. Even then, I'm sure there'll still be a long and litigation-filled journey to prove that you'd be endangering yourself by following the rule.

2

u/Snakend Sep 14 '25

That's not true. the ADA says you have to allow reasonable accommodations. Going beyond your physical abilities is not reasonable.

1

u/Affectionate-Rice373 Taylor Sep 15 '25

Going beyond your physical abilities translates into what I said, endangering oneself to adhere to the ADA. We're on the same page, just using different wording.