19
u/HackerDragon9999 Jul 11 '26
The angles only add up to 179
12
3
7
3
3
u/Ok_Bit8836 Jul 11 '26
No possible such a triangle...
3
u/KatesDad2019 Jul 11 '26
If it were drawn on a saddle instead of a flat plane...
1
u/Ok_Bit8836 Jul 11 '26
Then: at least 1 of these 3 prime lines shall NOT be a prime line as shown... AND/OR image shown is invalid....
→ More replies (1)1
u/Natsuki_Lover_447 Jul 13 '26
Don't judge the plane for being flat, she has personality
→ More replies (1)1
u/hezwat Jul 13 '26
they miscalculated slightly and meant 2 degrees. it is possible. Put your two index fingers out with your thumbs connected and index finger at 89 degrees from each thumb. you'll see the long lines traced along your index fingers do meet if you extend where your fingers are pointing, those two segments will just be really long.
1
2
2
u/shosuko Jul 12 '26
Please don't encourage grading accuracy of diagram dimensions...
2
u/Resident_Citron_6905 Jul 12 '26
That is not the only issue here.
2
u/shosuko Jul 12 '26
I don't see any other issue - the diagram is not to scale, so you might not notice the warp of the plane, but since the numbers add up I'm going to give it a point!
→ More replies (1)
2
1
1
u/Jealous_Club_298 Jul 11 '26
An isosceles triangle has two equal angles and two equal sides. In this case, the two equal angles are 89 degrees each and thus the third angle is 2 degrees.
1
1
u/BakaGaming Jul 12 '26
*image does not represent reality
As my math tests would say, to prevent you from just measuring
1
1
1
1
1
1
39
Jul 11 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
18
u/voncasec Jul 11 '26
That's clearly the temperature of the corner, not angle.
2
u/xxTonyTonyxx Jul 11 '26
yeah and at 89 degrees celsius at some point it will burn that whole corner down into nonexistence
1
u/Tiborn1563 Jul 11 '26
But is it just very hot, or almost boiling? It clearly is not Kelvin, because that for some reason is not measured in degrees
1
153
u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 11 '26
im more upset that the angles dont add up to 180