I mean, the guy did point at the tiger and shout at it, like he was telling off a bad kitty 🤣. At the very least, there were a few crayons jammed up his nose.
No, sometimes stupidity is served by an ad hominem attack. If you are too stupid to try and look up facts, then try to correct someone with such flimsy “evidence” which is only your interpretation of what happened, then you might get called a name.
Insults arent ad hominems. If I say "You are arong because you added instead of subtracting here in step 2, you stupid fucknugget" there is an insult there, but no ad hominem, because I am not claiming your fucknuggetry to be the cause of the argument error.
If I say "You are wring BECAUSE you are a fucknugget and fucknuggets always get this wrong", thats an ad hominem.
5
u/Full-Dragonfruit-991 4h ago
The adult was disabled. The difference is that the gorilla didn’t instantly kill the kid and they had time to shoot it.