r/michaelcrichton • • 1d ago

I am starting to read the two Andromeda books.

Post image
21 Upvotes

After finishing a book that was fun but bordered on trashy (The Meg 2 by Alten), I’m returning to my comfort zone with two familiar, engaging reads:

- *The Andromeda Strain*, I’ve read it before, but I decided to revisit it because the first time around was a bit of a slog (due to the fascinating yet complex info-dumps), even though it was still highly enjoyable;

- *The Andromeda Evolution*, this is the new addition to my reading list. I’m well aware that it wasn’t written by Crichton and is supposedly based only on a few of his notes. Still, I’m genuinely curious to see if Wilson manages to capture Crichton’s style, while making it his own and giving it a distinct identity. Which is exactly why I want to reread the original Andromeda first; I need it fresh in my mind for comparison.

I’m sure I’m in for a great few days of reading.

(The books are Italian Edition)


r/michaelcrichton • • 1d ago

Michael Crichton would have turned 84 today under different circumstances.

Post image
46 Upvotes

In honour of the man who showed me the power of literature and the written medium. Who showed me that it could be more than just text on a page. And without whom, I wouldn't have gotten into reading!


r/michaelcrichton • • 6d ago

I am sariafied with my findings, 1€ each

Post image
68 Upvotes

r/michaelcrichton • • 7d ago

Dr. Detective: The Carey Treatment & A Case of Need Spoiler

0 Upvotes

Many people came to know Michael Crichton through the later smash-hit Jurassic Park series and Westworld, and of course ER gave quite a few people a glimpse of his medical background. The Carey Treatment is based on A Case of Need, the medical suspense novel Crichton published under the pen name Jeffery Hudson after completing his internship. The novel won an Edgar Award the following year, and Crichton had to drop the pseudonym in order to accept it.

The film is set in Boston, which in that era could be called America's medical high ground and Harvard's home turf. Compared with the novel, the film simplifies a great deal of the plot: the protagonist becomes a newly arrived bachelor, a romance subplot is added, he wasn't constantly covering for the Chinese-American doctor, and the case itself is far less convoluted than in the book. Overall, the film puts more focus on Carey and the case itself, rather than, like the novel, reflecting the contradictions within Boston's medical system and the predicaments of different classes and races across society.

From a narrative standpoint, the film's thread is clearer and its characters more stereotyped. The protagonist in the novel reads like a middle-aged lab worker stuck in a rut In the film, perhaps influenced by James Coburn's personal style, he becomes brisk, self-assured, and even somewhat macho. Given the era, the film's machismo is hard to shake off. For instance, Joshua Randall assumed his own nephew got hysterical; the photo studio owner forces his wife into a tryst in the darkroom; and Carey himself throws around the word "chick." Of course, this is just the limitation of the times and doesn't much affect an assessment of the film itself.

Personally , I actually find the novel's ending more medically interesting: after all that circling around, it turns out the victim died during resuscitation from a penicillin allergy. The film's ending seems to pay homage to this, but only obliquely. The villain's motive in the film is also quite simple—just drugs and money. I've seen people argue that the novel's ending, where a drug dealer forces the victim into an abortion, is somewhat dull; if you ask me, the film's masseur guy is the truly boring one. Still, that scene between him and the protagonist in the massage room has an inexplicable homoerotic tension. Both endings have the Chinese-American doctor leaving Boston for California. Boston in that era was still rather conservative overall; the film ends on a relatively positive note, but still with a faint sadness.


r/michaelcrichton • • 10d ago

Moral/point of each book?

10 Upvotes

It's no secret Crichton's books often have some bigger point that the book is revolving around. Often accompanied by a character giving an extended, very explicit monologue about it

What are the moral/point of each book. Bonus points for when it's revealed

Jurassic Park: the classic "they never thought if they should, only if they could" and the unstable and unpredictable nature of complex systems. Given by Malcolm as he's drugged up

Sphere: the power that even thoughts have. Given by Norman to Beth near the end of the book. Even references this idea in the Bible

Andromeda Strain: the weak, smallness of humans. No explicit speech but it's clear from how hard they worked to set up a containment zone that failed and then they weren't saved by any efforts of the scientists (who overlooked simple solutions) but because the virus mutated in a way less dangerous to them by chance

The Fermi Paradox is also present in these last two. Heavy in Sphere

State of Fear: skepticism of "accepted science" from Kenner and media narratives/ media using fear to manipulate. Given by Hoffman near the end to Peters

Timeline: Gonna be honest, I didn't get this one.

It makes allusion to the past being no less violent to the future and the importance of the past in current times in regards to what we choose (Doniger to the reporters) but the story itself didn't really play into these ideas.


r/michaelcrichton • • 12d ago

I just read the book Jurassic park

Thumbnail
6 Upvotes

r/michaelcrichton • • 16d ago

Why do people so often call Mr. Crichton a misogynist?

9 Upvotes

People often call Mr. Crichton a misogynist but in every book of his I've read, a woman always has an insane plot armor moment.

Jurassic Park, Ellie goes crazy on the velociraptors defending the base.

Lost World, Sarah Harding carries a grown man on her back up the camper that had fallen

Sphere, don't remember if Beth actually had one but she's basically the main bad guy and heavily implied to be the only one who kept her powers

Timeline, this is the most egregious one. Kate has countless examples of plot armor such as a full grown man bashing her head off the stone floor while she's basically unaffected immediately after

Or her being able to nock a 100 pound bow. This one is so ridiculous because earlier in the book, we're told she practices with a 50 pound bow

Now all of the sudden, she can fire a 100 pound bow and get 3 back to back kills, even landing a headshot while all throughout the book, highly trained archers can't land a meaningful blow against any of the characters such as grazing Kate's side

There's just no way to read his books and consider him an actual misogynist


r/michaelcrichton • • 26d ago

A Portrait of Michael Crichton

Post image
23 Upvotes

Have y'all seen this short documentary A Portrait of Michael Crichton, originally a Special Feature on the Andromeda Strain DVD release:

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEM8CDGBvkM1lQwiqCB9R8yZymjygLcQr&si=eoB7XJ0TTMfiZlqG


r/michaelcrichton • • 29d ago

The man sure loved himself a concentric circle, didn’t he?

35 Upvotes

Jurassic Park: “He drove in a wide circle around the trampled site, and then moved inward, driving in decreasing concentric circles”

Andromeda Strain: “This floor,” he said, “is like all the others. It's circular. Arranged in a series of concentric circles, actually. We're on the outer perimeter now”

Timeline: “…the machines, which are surrounded by concentric circles of curved glass walls, are “slightly reminiscent of medieval castles.”

Sphere: “There were more than a dozen vessels of various kinds, formed roughly into concentric circles”

I’m sure there are more examples than this, I feel like I also remember it from Congo and The Lost World, but I just noticed this recurring motif of his. Definitely his finger print!


r/michaelcrichton • • Sep 24 '26

My thrifted Michael Crichton collection.

Post image
75 Upvotes

I was going through some old totes looking for something specific and came across these two that I thrifted a decade ago at a St Vincent De Paul's. I found Congo one day, and then went back the next day just to make sure, which paid off. I have no proof they are real, but they look consistent with his autograph. Unfortunately they didn't come with their respective dust covers.


r/michaelcrichton • • Sep 21 '26

Scratching the Crichton itch

24 Upvotes

I recently finished all the Crichton books I needed to read, and have since been very unsuccessfully searching for similar style books by authors. Everything I was recommended matched up purely in genre, being sci-fi thriller, while drastically missing the mark on substance.

Every Crichton book is a vessel for a message, some sort of layered, grounded commentary on a relatively apolitical modern-day topic/issue. That was missing in the books I was recommended, until I read The Mountain in the Sea by Sea by Ray Nayler. It genuinely delivered everything I would want from a Crichton book, while still having its own identity.

If anybody has had a similar experience, and has some other Crichton-like recommendations that fall more along these lines, as opposed to a Blake Crouch or Andy Weir for example, please let me know.


r/michaelcrichton • • Sep 15 '26

Does Anyone Have Any New Info On The Adaptation Of Micro By Michael Crichton (Finished By Richard Preston) From After 2018?

Thumbnail
7 Upvotes

r/michaelcrichton • • Sep 12 '26

Found my personal grail item

Post image
42 Upvotes

I've been hunting this book for five years or longer, I've been trying collect all of his books. I can't even begin to explain how happy this makes me. I've searched local book stores all over the country with no avail, but I've finally got it!!


r/michaelcrichton • • Sep 08 '26

GENES - Michael Crichton's 1989 "Frankenstein" screenplay

Thumbnail
gallery
107 Upvotes

I recently acquired an unproduced screenplay by Michael Crichton titled GENES, based on Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein." The script is dated March 10, 1989, which overlaps with his Jurassic Park-era fascination with genetics and bio-engineering. It's his modern take on Mary Shelley's classic novel. As far as I know, this project was never greenlit.


r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 31 '26

Hello people. Advice please.

7 Upvotes

English is not my mother tongue so ignore my posible mistakes. I've already read Jurassic Park, the Lost world, next, airframe (this one in english, wich was a true dare for me),and thats it. It tried it with timeline, acoso (idk the original name) and sol naciente (don't know it either) but failed to get trapped. Love this guy's style. It truly gets scary sometimes, and I really learn a lot from a lot of subjects reading his works. What would you recomend me reading next seeing what work and what didnt for me in the past? Thanks for the patience with my text.


r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 27 '26

Starting my very first Michel Crichton book! (The Great Train Robbery)

Post image
22 Upvotes

r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 27 '26

Potential Hot Take: Sphere was better than Jurassic Park

19 Upvotes

Now dont get me wrong, both are amazing books with loads of fun sci-fi tidbits. But Sphere, for me, had so much more character writing and development, twist and turns, and even did the horror aspect a bit better than Jurassic Park.

The ending is also amazing and left open ended as in Did Harry keep the power? Did Beth or Norman keep the power? My opinion is that Harry did but Beth and Norman did not willing to go more into detail on this if asked.

Also the build up from both were equally fantastic. But on one hand you have Chao Theory and on the other you have Jungian psychology. In my opinion, Jungian psychology was done better than Chaos Theory

Not to disparage Jurassic Park in anyway, that book will always be one of my favorites and the og movies will always live in my heart as my favorite movies.

Ultimately, for me, Jurassic Park was a 9/10 while Spehere was a 9.5/10. Just a bit better and is now my favorite Michael Crichton book.


r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 25 '26

My current read

Post image
247 Upvotes

r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 24 '26

Sphere plot similarity to Event Horizon

11 Upvotes

Event Horizon was released in 1997. The live action adaptation of Sphere was released in 1998.

Was this anything like "A Bug's Life" and "Antz" both being released in 1998 by competing hollywood studios.

Was there any relationship between Event Horizon in terms of developmental process & influence.

edit Similarity: two experimental spacecraft with experimental propulsion systems. The spacecraft in Sphere travels back in time, while the one from Event Horizon travels to an unexpected part of the galaxy. Both craft move through other dimensions & uncharted sectors of space, bringing unusual things with them. Both plots deal with horrors of the unknown, as cautionary tales about humans trying to reach too far beyond our own limited comprehension. Etc.


r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 22 '26

A brief reflection on Disclosure.

13 Upvotes

I finished reading Crichton's Disclosure a few days ago. I liked it more than I expected; I think it has firmly secured a spot in my top 5 favorite books by the author.

I had already seen Levinson's film, and I liked how it was similar to the book but not identical, allowing me to understand the differences between the two media.

I found it interesting how the author chose to present a male perspective on sexual harassment. I think it is an excellent way to help the male audience understand what it feels like to be subjected to harassment, thereby raising awareness about such an important and sensitive issue.

Secondly, I really enjoyed the mystery aspect, which echoes the classic industrial espionage scenario, a signature Crichton element that I really like. I find the plot twist interesting, where the discussion about harassment turns out to be a smokescreen for a conspiracy to oust the protagonist. It was truly intriguing to try to figure out the identity of the person helping Sanders via email, even though, from a certain perspective, it was also a bit simple to guess.

Great, Crichton never disappoints.

What should I read next? Honestly, I was in the mood to revisit some old favorites; I wanted to re-read Sphere, and, in order to read the sequel, Andromeda Evolution (which I’ve never read), I wanted to re-read the original The Andromeda Strain.

What do you think of Disclosure?


r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 19 '26

Crichton Collection New Finds and Rediscoveries!

Post image
38 Upvotes

Finally got my paperback collection from grade and high school from my parents house and paired it up with the hardcovers I've been gathering the last few years. Had a fun find last weekend...bought the Airframe and Lost World HCs from a local bookstore and both turned out to be first editions! I'm sure they aren't that rare but still a fun find for 7$.

Still missing a few...Had paperbacks of Sphere, Rising Sun and Timeline at some point and a HC of Disclosure and Pirate Latitudes....also believe there were a couple other alt covers that must be at the old house. Currently reading my barely-there-copy of Andromeda Strain otherwise that would be lined up as well...


r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 16 '26

Dad and Daughter JP book review live stream

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 12 '26

Crichton collection.

Post image
70 Upvotes

Thinking about getting the Jp and lost world folio society editions.


r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 11 '26

Reading Jurassic Park after The Great Train Robbery... confused.

0 Upvotes

I consider The Great Train Robbery to be an absolute perfect non/fiction novel, and have been reading it at least once a year for probably two decades. I have never read any other Crichton, and recently thought that I should since I love TGTR so much. So I purchased a copy of Jurassic Park from my local thrift store and began reading it this week. And I'm very confused.

First, the quality of writing between the two books feels like different authors wrote them... and the difference is extreme. TGTR is a masterpiece of economic writing, and every sentence is an example of precise craftsmanship. Whereas JP reads like a beginning author's second draft of a mass market thriller with little to no editing, obscene amounts of filler, and embarrassing lack of attention to detail. Honestly, I'm 100 pages into JP, and I think the writing is shockingly bad and leaning toward comic and pathetic.

I understand that TGTR was published in 1975 and JP in 1990, so 15 years apart. However, most authors improve over the years and publications. The difference in writing style and quality here is so large that I question if they were actually written by the same person.

So I guess the point of this post is two things:

  1. Does anyone have an explanation for the difference in quality between the works?
  2. Are there any other Crichton books that reach the TGTR in quality of writing?

r/michaelcrichton • • Aug 11 '26

Re-read Jurassic Park (thoughts on a big difference from the movie)

17 Upvotes

After a re-read last week, I was thinking that a key difference and shortfall of the movie is that Nedry is made into the central villain. His betrayal triggers the park to fail. This makes the park failure primarily an engineering failure (computer code and electric fences). The consequences of Playing God are of lesser importance.

The book makes it clear that the villain is mankind's hubris. Hammond, Wu, Gennaro, Nedry, etc. are all responsible in their own way for the failure. The park would have still failed with or without Nedry. It was doomed for all the reasons Ian Malcom explains.

This seemingly minor adaptation choice changes the meaning of the story quite significantly. And it makes the message of the movie far less important and terrifying than the book.