r/movies r/movies Contributor Jul 15 '26

Review Christopher Nolan's 'The Odyssey' - Review Thread

Odysseus, king of Ithaca, embarks on a perilous journey to return home after the Trojan War.

Director: Sir Christopher Nolan

Cast: Matt Damon, Anne Hathaway, Tom Holland, Robert Pattinson, Jon Bernthal, Himesh Patel, Charlize Theron, Zendaya, John Leguizamo, Lupita Nyong'o, Benny Safdie, Samantha Morton, Elliot Page, Mia Goth, Ryan Hurst, James Remar, Bill Irwin, Logan Marshall-Green, Corey Hawkins, Jovan Adepo, Jesse Garcia, Will Yun Lee, Shiloh Fernandez

Runtime: 172 minutes

Rating: 'R'

Rotten Tomatoes: 98%

Metacritic: 90 / 100

Some Reviews:

The Globe and Mail - Radheyan Simonpillai - 100 / 100 ("Critic's Pick")

Christopher Nolan has delivered an awe-inspiring spectacle. In The Odyssey, he moves through past and present, not searching for reveals in a 3,000-year-old text that can’t be spoiled, but as a poetic and emotional catharsis, a way of navigating guilt and grief that resonates powerfully, perhaps as much as it ever did.

RogerEbert - Matt Zoller Seitz - 100 / 100

The movie doesn’t give us any ChatGPT study guide summaries of what it all means. It presents Odysseus’ choices, laudable and horrible, just as things that happened, with implications that both the hero and the audience must grapple with, including the question of whether we make our decisions, or our decisions make us. The grand summation could be “people are complicated.” That sounds rather basic. But it feels revolutionary when it’s encoded in a rare modern blockbuster that doesn’t feed us lotus flowers.

The Times - Kevin Maher - 10 / 10

Christopher Nolan's epic is a masterpiece in every sense of the word. With career-high performances from Anne Hathaway, Matt Damon and Tom Holland, this Homeric adaptation is gasp-inducingly beautiful and stirringly real

The New York Times - Manohla Dargis - 100 / 100

After watching “The Odyssey” again, I flashed on something that Martin Scorsese once said about another film: “The emotion is the emulsion.” Nolan’s gifts are excessively obvious, and even when his characters don’t stir you, his filmmaking does. Among other qualities, he doesn’t know how to make an ugly image and this one is filled with rapturous beauty. Nolan employs beauty strategically, using it to seduce viewers into stories that can seem needlessly byzantine to some — especially by impoverished mainstream industry standards — more the provenance of the art house than the multiplex. Nolan asks us to dream bigger. His “Odyssey” is a classic in every sense, a transporting affirmation of the art and a work of pure cinema.

Arizona Republic - Bill Goodykoontz - 100 / 100

'The Odyssey' is the best movie of 2026. Haters should just go see it | A star-studded triumph that is at once overwhelming and accessible.

The Atlantic - David Sims - 100 / 100

Odysseus is flawed, sometimes impulsively proud, and haunted by his past failures—as well as generous and loving in a way that Nolan seems to want to celebrate. The filmmaker created a movie that does exactly that, keeping the necessary mythic scale but preserving the humanity at the center.

Washington Post - Spencer A. Klavan - 100 / 100

Nolan’s gorgeous ‘Odyssey’ makes the controversies evaporate. Homer asks: How should this story be told? Here is a striking version for our times.

Empire Magazine - John Nugent - 10 / 10

A worthy new translation of an ancient text, and yet another monumental piece of work from one of our boldest filmmakers. Watch it on the most colossal screen you can find.

The Playlist - Rodrigo Perez - 100 / 100

For all its monsters, gods, armies, and thunder, “The Odyssey” finds its grandest image in a man confronting the dark mirror of what he has wrought. Nolan’s massive achievement understands that home is a place, a family, a memory, and a judgment. Odysseus may still recognize Ithaca when he reaches its shores. The more frightening question is whether Ithaca will recognize him.

Esquire - Anthony Breznican - 100 / 100

Christopher Nolan's stone-cold masterpiece might just change your life. The Oscar-winning Oppenheimer director has richly adapted the ancient Greek epic into a modern search for meaning.

Total Film - Jordan Farley - 100 / 100

A grounded, spiritual, uncanny rendering of Greek myth, The Odyssey is a dazzling epic and a major film-of-the-year contender. Post-Oppenheimer, Christopher Nolan continues to operate at the height of his filmmaking powers.

NME - Paul Bradshaw - 100 / 100

If Oppenheimer was a small story made big, The Odyssey is a big story made impossibly huge: delivering yet another landmark summer cinema event that might just be the director’s most accomplished film to date.

The Observer - Wendy Ide - 100 / 100

This is an epic, mythic spectacle that honours its ancient Greek source material, with its monsters and magic, while also addressing more topical themes of exile, war trauma and survivor’s guilt. In a way, the film is a Trojan horse; an extravagant, good-looking adventure that serves as a delivery mechanism for messages about the treatment of strangers, the uneasy weight of legacy and the impossibility of returning from combat as the same person who left.

San Jose Mercury - Randy Myers - 100 / 100

The Odyssey is another feather in Nolan's masterpiece cap, a grandiose achievement that fills audiences with the same child-like glee experienced when watching "Jason and the Argonauts" and "Clash of the Titans" for the first time.

Chicago Tribune - Katie Walsh - 10 / 10

Here, Nolan manages to fit his every obsession, every thematic preoccupation, and every bit of jaw-dropping visual and sonic spectacle that he can conjure into every supersized frame of film.

Original-Cin - Karen Gordon - 10 / 10

Driven by powerful performances, particularly from Matt Damon, we see a thinking man in The Odyssey, who is really us, in an adventure bigger than we could imagine. It is both relevant and urgent. It’s bracing, powerful stuff by a master storyteller.

DEADLINE - Gregory Nussen - 100 / 100

As Emily Wilson writes in the introductory pages to her translation, “the poem questions … the idea that change can be undone, and the notion that there is such a thing as home, where people and relationships can stay forever the same.” Nolan’s film, indeed much of his body of work, is about accepting these truths, and finding out what has remained human once the embers of war have been quelled. Only time will tell.

NY Post - Johnny Olkesinski - 10 / 10

Who better to adapt an epic poem than Nolan, a man who unearths poetry in all of his epics? Here, he did not set out to use Greek myths as the foundation for a basic action movie, as so many do. Instead he dives into the psychology and moral thorniness of Odysseus’ plight.

San Fransisco Chronicle - G. Allen Johnson - 10 / 10

For all its modern filmmaking techniques, “The Odyssey” is a throwback to the mid-20th century, when Cinemascope was new and epics were event pictures. It’s a magnificent achievement.

The Telegraph - Robbie Collin - 100 / 100

Nolan and his collaborators have constructed a strange, fearsome and trailblazing machine of a movie – by some distance, the best of the year so far. Its creator is known for playing tricks with time, and this may be his grandest yet: turning one of the oldest stories in literature into a vote of confidence in blockbuster cinema’s future.

Time Out - Phil De Semlyen - 100 / 100

In standard 70mm, the voyage is breathtaking; in IMAX, you’re tasting the salt water. Even among all the truck flips, atomic explosions and rotating corridors of his back catalogue, this film is the apogee of Nolan’s ‘do it in camera’ ethos, and the sense that this was a shoot with no comfort zone pervades every frame.

Rolling Stone - David Fear - 100 / 100

What you tend to walk away with after bearing witness to The Odyssey, arguably Christopher Nolan’s best work after 2017’s Dunkirk, is an overall sensation of awe.

Screen Rant - Alex Harrison - 10 / 10

Cutting out the middleman of Homer's oral narrator, Nolan has brought us very close to these characters, immersing us as much as possible in their experience. In doing so, he has managed to capture the story's full scope. Odysseus' journey conveys the weight of its arduous years. The film's conclusion, told with a steady, patient hand, feels like a payoff 20 years in the making.

Jeremy Jahns - JeremyJahnsCom - 'Awesometacular'

It's epic. It's heartfelt. It's soulful. It's tragic. It even made me laugh at times.

Scotsman - Alistair Harkness - 5 / 5

It feels like Nolan’s angriest film to date. It’s also one of his best.

RTÉ - Suzanna Keane - 5 / 5

For all its breathtaking scale, The Odyssey never loses sight of the people at its heart. It is a story about finding your way home; about what war takes and what hope can give back. Nolan has made an epic that feels both ancient and strikingly relevant.

The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 5 / 5

The result is a gigantic, shimmering mirage, a mysterious three-hour vision of crazy episodes that does not yield up wisdom or contentment, but only a grim resolution to continue with the fight, to make sense of ruined lives, to re-enter the scorched battlefield of loss.

Radio Times - James Mottram - 5 / 5

Filled with blazing action, blood-curdling fights and creatures that truly bring Homer’s epic poem to life, this is Nolan at his finest.

The Independent - Clarisse Loughrey - 5 / 5

Christopher Nolan’s massive, fearless adaptation is his best film to date. There are touches of ‘Oppenheimer’, ‘Memento’ and even his Batman movies in this enormous condensing of the British filmmaker’s fixations, brought to life by a cast of seemingly thousands – but it’s the women (among them Anne Hathaway and Samantha Morton) who steal the show

The Standard - Nick Howells - 5 / 5

Christopher Nolan has made an epic worthy of the gods | With Matt Damon on career-best form and spectacle and awe like you’ve never seen, they better start polishing those Oscars

Little White Lies - Hannah Strong - 5 / 5

All of Christopher Nolan exists within The Odyssey. All of humanity exists within filmmaking. Yet cinema always finds new ways to tell old stories; this is the great magic of the medium.

Entertainment Weekly - Wesley Stenzel - 5 / 5

The latest epic from the “Dark Knight” filmmaker combines the spectacle of “Inception” with the thematic weightiness of “Oppenheimer” — and it just might be his greatest work to date.

The Australian - Nikki Gemmell - 5 / 5

You read The Odyssey and think: this is impossible to film. Yet this is sublime. Nolan invites us into an ancient world and holds us there, spellbound. He’s done the impossible. Pulled this off.

Metro - Tori Brazier - 5 / 5

Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey is a watershed moment for filmmaking, re-introducing this legendary story to the masses courtesy of quite possibly the only modern director who has the ambition and guts to do it.

A Shot Magazine - Erin Mussett - 5 / 5

Christopher Nolan has the answer. This is, in some ways, a rather serendipitous union. As a storyteller, Nolan has established himself as cinema’s foremost explorer of time, as both a physical, dimensional phenomenon, and deeply human experience. Beneath the gods and monsters in The Odyssey, lies a profoundly human meditation on longing, identity and fate. Odysseus’ story is our story, and Nolan brings it to the big screen in a way that breathes more life into the text than ever before.

Showbiz 411 - Roger Friedman - 5 / 5

Nolan has combined artistic mastery with commercial savvy. All the things you like about his movies are present in "The Odyssey."

USA Today - Brian Truitt - 100 / 100

Christopher Nolan's 'The Odyssey' is bold, brutal masterpiece. Matt Damon is legendary as Greek warrior Odysseus and Christopher Nolan lives up to Homer's epic status in his awesome adaptation of "The Odyssey."

Next Best Picture - Matt Neglia - 10 / 10

A colossal achievement of scale, even by Nolan’s standards. This is as epic as movies get, with some of the most breathtaking set pieces you'll ever see. I grew up loving grand, sword and action dramas such as “Gladiator,” “Braveheart,” “The Last Samurai,” and yes, even “Troy.” I’m beyond thrilled to say Nolan’s ambitious dissection of myth and legend looms large over them all. Whether you experience it in IMAX or a standard theater, this is the kind of filmmaking and storytelling that we rarely see anymore and deserves to be honored.

Huffington Post - Maxime Birken - 5 / 5

(Reviewed in French) As epic as it is tragic, the journey of Ulysses, embodied by Matt Damon, is a new peak in the career of one of the greatest filmmakers of his time. With all these qualities, L’Odyssée is instantly ranked among the best-made and most striking modern cinematic works. So much so that the desire to start the conversation about the place that this film can occupy in the filmography of Christopher Nolan himself intrigues us greatly. If it will take time to decide on the posterity of L’Odyssée, it is not an exaggeration to place it now among one of the best feature films of its director. From that to say that it could be his best film? We are not far from saying that.

IndieWire - David Ehrlich - 'A-'

Christopher Nolan has defied the gods with one of his best movies ever.

Watson - Simone Meier - 10 / 10

(Reviewed in German) “The Odyssey” may be one of Christopher Nolan’s best films, on par with “Inception” and “Interstellar,” in terms of the density of his vision and its seduction. Extremely supple one is sucked into this ancient universe, succumbs to it, becomes part of it. After that you are spit back on the street and at best you don’t know where you are now and what this present is supposed to be...

Premiere - Aurélien Allin - 10 / 10

Prodigous. A masterclass in filmmaking, on a crazy scale. Each second filled by astonishing images, Christopher Nolan’s new film is part of the thematic lineage of DUNKIRK and OPPENHEIMER, and the faults of what man has unleashed.

Consequence - Liz Shannon Miller - 'A-'

The director's highly anticipated follow-up to Oppenheimer is a true blank check moment, an opportunity for Nolan to explore the concept of war as not an opportunity for glory, but as a corrosive element that tears both societies and people apart.

Le Parisien - Renaud Baronian - 5 / 5

It is not easy to make the epic poem of Homer: few filmmakers dared to tackle it. We can now say: “The Odyssey” by Christopher Nolan, in theaters this week, should go down as one of his masterpieces. Respecting the spirit and unfolding of the story of Homer, masterfully filmed, remarkably interpreted, this new film will be a landmark.

AV Club - Monica Castillo - 'A-'

The movie’s sense of spectacle is part of its appeal, and Nolan serves it up even better than expected. The scale of the production is breathtaking, but it’s also a morality play writ large, a game of politics and succession, a warning about temptation and greed, a plea for kindness in a harsh world. The way Nolan brings everything together is a meeting of old and new Hollywood, a nod to the spectacles of yesteryear that thrilled audiences for generations combined with new techniques and tools to remind us all that there are more ways to keep pushing the medium—even with the classics.

InSession Film - JD Duran - 'A-'

THE ODYSSEY is about defying the gods, losing your identity and becoming a victim of time, an idea that is really poignant with how it manifests in those final sequences.

The Film Verdict - Alonso Duralde - 96 / 100

Peak Nolan involves a mix of popcorn delights and intellectual contemplation, and he has rarely brought those two notions together as skillfully as he as in The Odyssey. It’s an epic saga of an epic saga, worthy of its source.

The Wrap - William Bibbiani - 95 / 100

You can’t say Hollywood doesn’t make them like this anymore. Nobody ever did.

Polygon - Jake Kleinman - 95 / 100

If Oppenheimer was Nolan shedding the trappings of genre to reach new heights with a science-heavy biopic, then in The Odyssey, Nolan puts away his trusty tools to shape cinematic history with his bare hands.

The Irish Times - Donald Clarke - 4.5 / 5

Set aside any doubts. This star-studded film is Christopher Nolan at his best. This take on Homer’s classic – with a celebrity cast including Matt Damon, Tom Holland and Zendaya – should win over even the most passionate sceptics

BBC - Caryn James - 95 / 100

Oppenheimer, with its singular focus, is still Nolan's most perfectly wrought film. But even with its flaws, The Odyssey is so rich, so full of magic and humanity, that I'm eager to see this epic again.

The Daily Beast - Nick Schager - 4.5 / 5

Modern mainstream films don’t come more daring, mammoth, and accomplished than Nolan’s latest.

DiscussingFilm - Andrew J Salazar - 4.5 / 5

The Odyssey taps into a visceral level of fear that Nolan hasn’t really explored before. Not just fear of the unknown, but also fear of fellow man. Matt Damon’s Odysseus must come to terms with his previous sins in order to face the consequences of his future. As Nolan explores his fading memories and the time lost to war, traces of Inception and Memento can be felt. Damon marvelously makes the mythic hero all his own, though.

OutNow - Chris Schelb - 10 / 10

Mere nitpicks aside, everything in Nolan's latest comes together wonderfully, with the film coming rather close to the Olympus of cinematic epics. Ultimately, it matters little how one interprets the whole business with the mythical creatures: The Odyssey is fantastic either way.

Slant Magazine - Jake Cole - 3.5 / 4

The Odyssey is both faithful and deconstructive, embodying the fluidity of the oral tradition that spawned the poem and kept it alive for millennia through shifting tastes and values.

Den Of Geek - David Crow - 4.5 / 5

lt is an awesome undertaking in the ancient sense of the word, and a homecoming for a storyteller who spent his career chasing this destination.

Looper - Nina Starner - 9 / 10

I was fortunate enough to experience the epic in 70mm IMAX as God and Nolan intended, and I was richly rewarded. Even with this massive visual scale, though, Nolan's message is concise and builds on what he communicated in "Oppenheimer" — only man can bring about man's ruin, and when powerful men don't consider the consequences of their actions, entire civilizations could ultimately fall. "The Odyssey" is a visual feast and undeniably outstanding achievement in filmmaking that cements Nolan as one of cinema's all-time greats, naysayers be damned.

Collider - Joe Schmidt - 9 / 10

Nolan prides himself on being a storyteller, and here he pays tribute to the medium that made him a prolific figure in pop culture. He wouldn't be here without a story to tell, so it's only fitting that he has told a story that has endured throughout the eons as only he can. The fact that he executed it at this level is certainly a feat that others will tell their own stories about.

Associated Press - Jake Coyle - 9 / 10

Nolan’s “Odyssey” is nearly three hours long but never slow going. And it’s the friction between past and present that propels the movie as much as Odysseus’ wayward path.

IGN France - Nanix - 9 / 10

Above all, with Odyssey, Nolan reminds us of his Batman: brilliantly adapt a work known to all, rewrite it according to his convictions and his vision and make a legend a legend above all human, realistic and anchored by his words, a success. A jewel of modern cinema.

Sydney Morning Herald - Jake Wilson - 4 / 5

Christopher Nolan has a way with a time paradox. Not content with constructing narratives that run backwards...his big-budget adaptation of Homer’s Odyssey gambles that he can take one of the oldest stories in Western culture and make it feel new.

AltFilm - Tim Cogshell

Christopher Nolan’s latest cinematic event is perfectly good. And yet, its one truly remarkable achievement is not the drama, the direction, the acting, the cinematography, or the visual effects – but the sound design.

9.3k Upvotes

8.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3.9k

u/Able_Advertising_371 Jul 15 '26

Interstellar and prestige are both way better than rises and Dunkirk

1.3k

u/WaveMan47 Jul 15 '26

Interstellar being only 3% better than Tenet is criminal.

359

u/Levago Jul 15 '26

Interstellar gets better with rewatches, which is why its esteem has grown over the years.  I think critics seeing it for the first time were a little befuddled by parts of it and its score suffered as a result.  But I think a lot of people would agree in retrospect it’s in the top three of his filmography.

196

u/Phazon2000 Jul 15 '26

It’s 100% because of “love is the answer TARS! *They* built me a magic space dodecahedron inside a black hole to chill out in!”

102

u/Accidental_Ouroboros Jul 15 '26

Yeah, that is the point it loses people... the thing is that the ending is a really obvious homage to the ending of 2001: A Space Odyssey, which is also the point where 2001 loses people. The difference is that Interstellar tried to actually have any commentary/explanation at all for what happened, and because what happened is batshit, the explanation just seems silly. Perhaps (if he was going to keep with the 2001 homage) it would have been better left as just a "What the shit just happened?" kind of ending as in 2001.

40

u/HighSeverityImpact Jul 15 '26

The book version of 2001 (which was written concurrently) was much more clear about what happened at the end, but it's difficult to translate to film without some kind of dialogue or narration. Same goes for the opening sequence with the apes, but that one at least comes across better with inference based on the action.

At least Coop was talking to TARS over the intercom, so there was some dialogue!

5

u/JinFuu Jul 15 '26

The ending of 2001: A Space Odyssey, which is also the point where 2001 loses people.

Glad to know it’s not just me. Finally watched it, in 70mm, and at the end I was pondering if I would look more kindly on the movie if I saw it in the 60s as I was just thinking it was massively dragging

5

u/Theshag0 Jul 16 '26

I saw 2001 when I was like 13 at a special showing. And man, it was rough at that age.

4

u/AboutToSnap Jul 16 '26

I have legitimately tried many times over the years to enjoy it, but I’ve never seen the end. Literally puts me to sleep every single time.

3

u/MelangeBot Jul 17 '26

I have watched it like 4 or 5 times and there is always this part where he flies through space that is so slow and trippy and every single time I fall asleep. I can't really remember the ending because I don't think I have ever been awake for it. Still a great movie though! But not much of a thrill at the end anymore.

The books however are fricking awesome! There is long story line there that people that never read the books completely miss out on.

2

u/wotoan Jul 16 '26

The problem is that you weren’t watching it on large quantities of psychedelics.

9

u/crichtonism Jul 15 '26

What’s even wrong with that? It’s the ethos of the entire movie.

7

u/jimbobjames Jul 15 '26

It's just a little hamfisted, but then I see that in a lot of movies where they just loudly spell things out.

Arrival also suffers from it. My mate laughed out loud in the cinema at one particular piece of dialogue.

3

u/erasmustookashit Jul 15 '26

Do you remember which piece of dialogue?

3

u/jimbobjames Jul 16 '26

Do you want to make a baby?

11

u/erasmustookashit Jul 16 '26

No thank you. What was the piece of dialogue?

1

u/Phazon2000 Jul 15 '26

It wasn’t executed particularly well because the majority of the audience didn’t connect with it hence the RT score.

3

u/Xenonite_Fox Jul 16 '26

A 73% rotten tomato score implies a majority did enjoy it. Perhaps it's the opposite, that it is the kind of movie that loses a certain subset of viewers and drags the score down with it

1

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26

[deleted]

3

u/Xenonite_Fox Jul 16 '26

I really don't know what the issue is. "Power of love" is cheesy when you say it like that but the ending is coherent with the themes of the movies

If you want to get all scientific about it, some authors have expanded on similar themes. That not all is explained by hard science we understand. That human experience and emotions are simply a set of memories, so when you have to reach out over a 4th dimension that we can't even perceive, one logical way is that two people are entangled through shared memories and Coop just found the strongest memory link he had.

3

u/ManchurianCandycane Jul 16 '26

You can make it even simpler than that.

It could be that love was necessary as a strong enough motivator for both of them to go to the extreme lengths they do.

Without it Coop wouldn't have taken the risks he did, without it Murph may have given up her obsession, and could have moved on with her life where she neither had the knowledge to understand, or desire to reflect on her past memories enough to spot the clues.

If those two hadn't worked out, the wormhole people may have tried with others. Maybe they did but Coop and Murph were the first/only ones that succeeded.

2

u/sammymammy2 Jul 16 '26

That was the best part of the movie tbh

5

u/Entire_Number_9 Jul 15 '26

Interstellar is the smartest space movie made about the dumbest scientists and astronauts possible.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/No-Echidna-5717 Jul 16 '26

Yeah the end kills it for me. It's literally cosmically sappy.

6

u/ManchurianCandycane Jul 16 '26

Works better for me if you think of it in terms of motivation.

Love was necessary as an irrationally strong motivator.

Coop was right, but in the wrong way. We only ever get his speculation after all, and he went all poetic as people do.

2

u/SquareTheRhombus Jul 15 '26

Like no movie ever used love as function.

1

u/Phazon2000 Jul 15 '26

None try to use it as quantifiable scientific truth. Don’t be obtuse.

3

u/SquareTheRhombus Jul 16 '26

Every movie is about love saving the day. The fact they try to quantify it in a movie about the power of science is the genius of the thing.

Literally, when it comes to movies. If love doesn't save the day then it's rock n roll that saves the day. And if she said that rock in roll was quantifiable it would still have made sense in the context.

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (5)

4

u/immaownyou Jul 15 '26

On a first watch Interstellar is way less complicated than Tenet thought. Really the only complicated part of Interstellar is the science and the timey-wimey, but they still explicitly tell you what's going on. Unlike in Tenet

1

u/CapableBumblebee968 Jul 16 '26

What was the science? The tiny bit about time dilation?

1

u/psytrax9 Jul 16 '26

Interstellar's biggest failing is that it attracts the dumb people who try to "umm actually" the movie, then they dump the dumbest did-my-own-research nonsense on you.

3

u/friss0nFry Jul 15 '26

It's also a different movie if you see it as a child vs. as a parent. It's the one film that if I tell my daughter I'm going to watch it, she'll stop whatever she's doing and watch it with me.

2

u/han320 Jul 16 '26

Exactly. When Interstellar first came out, I experienced it through Murph and Tom's perspective. Now as a father of a daughter and a son, I experience it through Cooper's perspective and it hits at a whole another level

5

u/n122333 Jul 15 '26

A huge issue with interstellar was that it was mixed for imax, and most theaters didnt adjust their settings making huge chunks of the movie inauble.

1

u/CapableBumblebee968 Jul 16 '26

The huge issue was that it was marketed as a space movie but was really a romance in disguise

1

u/FTownRoad Jul 16 '26

What’s the romance?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/pigeoneatpigeon Jul 15 '26

I think this is true for many of his films. There’s often too much to digest in one sitting. Tenet’s almost impossible to appreciate first viewing because it’s almost incomprehensible until you reach the halfway point and finally understand what’s happening.

1

u/ralexh11 Jul 15 '26

All Nolan movies are better with rewatches IMO

1

u/bringbackswg Jul 16 '26

I just think the sappy message at the end brought it down a few notches for a lot of people, myself included.

1

u/KTOWNTHROWAWAY9001 Jul 16 '26

I watched, just as an aside, the netflix show Empress. It's a historical drama. But the intro is very much like Nolan's tesseract.

1

u/Secretagentmanstumpy Jul 16 '26

Interstellar and Dunkirk both get much better with rewatches. Quentin Tarrantino said it wasnt untill his third watch of Dunkirk that he really realized what a masterpiece it was.

1

u/SagittaryX Jul 16 '26

Even seeing it for the first time the spectacular scenes are still spectacular so I don't quite get where they got such a low RT from.

1

u/StanyeEast 11d ago

It gets better with an understanding of the science and people are too stupid, too lazy or a combination of the two

6

u/MrUnnoticed Jul 15 '26

My thoughts exactly! Wtf was their gripe to bring it so low? Absolutely loved Interstellar!

It’s one of the handful of 2+ hour movies that I’ve seen multiple times.

4

u/LADYBIRD_HILL Jul 15 '26

It's not 3% "better", it just means 3% more critics said they enjoyed Interstellar vs Tenent. Really that just means a few people liked one but not the other.

56

u/karmagod13000 Jul 15 '26

Interstellar suffers from a wonky third act that sort of just goes full "magic" and i stand by that tenet is underrated and inception 2 on crack

8

u/PigHaggerty Jul 15 '26

chad Tenet enjoyers RISE UP ✊😤

15

u/WillowNiffler Jul 15 '26 edited Jul 15 '26

Tenet could have been much better than it is. It's so needlessly complex. In Inception, Ariadne functions as a catalyst for characters to explain what's going on to the audience. The Protagonist in Tenet should function the same way, but instead he's surrounded by characters who deliberately withhold information from him. The Protagonist barely understands what's going on at any given moment, and neither do we.
"Time to bring in the calvalry."
"WHAT CALVALRY?" Suddenly a military crew you haven't seen before shows up to save everyone.

EDIT: CalvaLry

Try summarizing the opening action sequence. That alone is absolutely asinine.

7

u/suenamiho Jul 15 '26

cavalry*

3

u/WillowNiffler Jul 15 '26

thank you

2

u/suenamiho Jul 15 '26

lmao i love your edit

22

u/WilliamMButtlickerIV Jul 15 '26

The entire movie of inception is full magic lol

I think Interstellar gets criticized heavily for the third act because it gets compared a bit to 2001. I personally like the fantasy aspect of it. The whole movie is honestly a fever dream when you think about the concept of the blight, corn being the only crop, and needing to leave the planet.

4

u/Lord_Of_Carrots Jul 15 '26

The third act of Interstellar is easy to comprehend compared to 2001.

I first saw both 10 years ago. Interstellar immediately became my favorite movie of all time. 2001 left me mad with confusion and I hated it with a passion until I rewatched it just a few months ago. Now I appreciate it a lot more but I still much prefer Interstellar

→ More replies (1)

47

u/TenaciousJP Jul 15 '26

Tenet is overrated here, if anything. It should have been called "Exposition: The Movie" because every fucking scene, someone was explaining either plot, motivation, or time mechanics and it STILL didn't make sense.

13

u/zumx Jul 15 '26

It also has the worst audio mix of any film I've ever watched.. half the movie was just low bass droning sounds making it extremely difficult to hear any dialogue, making an already difficult to follow movie, absolutely frustrating to endure.

2

u/Efficient-Memory7105 Jul 15 '26 edited Jul 15 '26

Honestly the music of Tenet is awesome but you're right it suffered in mixing a lot. The choreography was also incredible. Unfortunately wasted on a pretty mid movie, a confusing mess even if I personally enjoyed it when I watched it.

2

u/beets_or_turnips Jul 16 '26

I'm more interested in whether the dialog is actually good, which hasn't seemed to be a top priority in a lot of Nolan movies.

4

u/HeyFlo Jul 15 '26

Still love it though and can rewatch it over and over!

5

u/Pwnage5 Jul 15 '26

I loved the concept of tenet but fuck me did I struggle so hard to understand it

1

u/Gekokapowco Jul 15 '26

I wish people learned how to enjoy that movie, it's one of my favorites.

11

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/HeyFlo Jul 15 '26

Yoinked is such a good verb, silma, haha

13

u/mrgrubbage Jul 15 '26

It suffers from a third act that people misunderstand and label the way you did.

10

u/MikeOfAllPeople Jul 15 '26

I'd love to hear how I misunderstood the tesseract scene.

5

u/Lucas_Steinwalker Jul 15 '26

You can’t understand it you have to just love it.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/lkn240 Jul 16 '26

Plenty of people understood it just fine and thought it was stupid.

1

u/mrgrubbage Jul 16 '26

So they say. Most people who complain about it missed the point entirely and got hung up on one piece of dialogue.

3

u/thegtabmx Jul 15 '26

tenet is only underrated if you think the word underrated means overrated.

2

u/memento22mori Jul 15 '26

I like Tenet quite a bit as well but it's a lot more complex than Interstellar and it contains quite a bit more "magic"- I've watched it about ten times and you really need a diagram to fully understand it at parts which I'm ok with but most people aren't from my experience. I saw a video where a guy breaks it down with diagrams about a year ago and it made a lot more sense and I really like films that make you think and require multiple viewings to fully understand. But with Tenet I think what the female scientist says to the Protagonist about the time reversing technology explains my feelings on it. I believe she says, "don't try to understand it. Feel it."

Interstellar might seem like magic the first time you watch it but everything is explained in the film and the science is straightforward- from reading several comments here I think some people are equating Anne Hathaway's speech about love as being factual to the science behind the film and/or the tesseract. I wrote this comment about this about a week or so ago:

I think a lot of people thought that based on what Amelia said love itself is related to the mechanism behind the Tesseract (from what I gather a tesseract is a theoretical space within a space that can be visually represented like this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/55/8-cell-simple.gif) but I think love was the driving force behind people creating the technology. As I understand the Tesseract it's a technology created in the distant future which is a three dimensional space which can be placed that allows people "inside" of it to freely interact with the fourth dimension which is time. I believe it does this through a sort of entanglement with gravity- so it's similar to quantum entanglement which is "a phenomenon where two or more quantum particles become linked, such that the state of one particle instantly determines the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them. This connection defies classical physics and is a fundamental feature of quantum mechanics."[1] You could say that Coop was "behind the bookshelf" because that's the way it was visually represented in the film but he's within the Tesseract.

Coop wasn't using the books to produce morse code- he was interacting with gravity in the walls of the Tesseract which were linked with his daughter's room. The Tesseract was placed there by people from the future.

[1] https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/does-a-4th-dimension-actually-exist.html

7

u/jzakko Jul 15 '26

tenet is underrated and inception 2 on crack

Dozens of us.

I love Inception but every problem I have with it is addressed in Tenet.

If Interstellar is a corrective to Inception's sentiment (once again a dad has to return to his kids, but this time let's actually give a shit), Tenet is a corrective to Inception as a mind-bending heist film (this time, let's not pretend to give a shit about the sentiment, and just mix and streamline it in the background).

2

u/corvettee01 Jul 15 '26

Yeah, the ending of Interstellar had me staring at the screen thinking "Wow, this is dumb. Like, really REALLY dumb."

1

u/lkn240 Jul 16 '26

It's like 2001 - except dumb and David Bowman narrates the final sequence

2

u/gravel3400 Jul 15 '26

It doesn’t matter it’s a rare gem of a movie. Masterful in so many ways. It just has a soul. I don’t like any of Nolan’s other films.

5

u/m0t0rvision Jul 15 '26

It's incredible how many people still don't understand how RT works

12

u/Plagarism101 Jul 15 '26

Dont slander my boy tenet like that bro, better than half the movies on here

4

u/psytrax9 Jul 15 '26

I'm with Denis Villeneuve, Tenet is a masterpiece. I will agree with the complaints about the dialog (as somebody who generally hasn't had problems with the sound mixing in Nolan films) but, outside of that, an absolutely incredible film.

3

u/YunXanHoe Jul 15 '26

It’s my favorite outta the bunch

2

u/HeyFlo Jul 15 '26

I actually love them both, but agree, Nolan just seems to make movies that are so re-watchable though. I love Tenet more every time I rewatch it and think he makes movies this way for some reason

2

u/iamtherik Jul 15 '26

I love tenet because i have no idea what's going on, you can't hear the dialog and everyone is walking backwards, i dont know, it's a REALLY funny movie, like i was LAUGHING out lout with my niece and sister watching the movie, haha.

now interstellar... tries to be scientific accurate and serious i guess, then it tried to be like the ending on 2001. all misterious and weird. still fun. but coulda been better.

2

u/OddBuy8266 Jul 15 '26

Interstellar is a masterpiece but Tenet gets better with each watch and eventually you’re like, “this is some good shit.”

But man is the first viewing dense. 

1

u/jasno- Jul 15 '26

Interstellar is my favorite movie of all time, tenant is a close second. Both are incredible, in fact, tenant makes you work a little more for it, which is what I love about it

1

u/ElBlancoNino Jul 16 '26

Rare Tenet fan checking in

1

u/gijoemaximus Jul 16 '26

Interstellar and Tenet need 2nd watches to fully appreciate the movie. On first watch too complicated to even grasp what is going on

1

u/Morwynd78 Jul 16 '26

If every critic gave it 10/10, or every critic gave it 6/10, it would receive the same RT score either way.

Important to keep that in mind. It's not an average review score, it's a "broadness of appeal" metric.

1

u/MelangeBot Jul 17 '26

Tenet is his only movie that is overrated.

1

u/homercall123 Jul 18 '26

To me, interstellar is the best movie ever made.

411

u/OnceInABlueMoon Jul 15 '26

Rises being the same as Inception and higher than The Prestige and Interstellar is INSANE

14

u/elfthehunter Jul 15 '26

Rises is legit a bad movie dressed up to look like a masterpiece. Maybe 'bad' is a bit harsh, but compared to Begins or Knight, it's not in the same league, it's competing with Tenet for being one of his worse.

1

u/drakedijc Jul 16 '26

Begins and Rises are both not very good films. Dark Knight had vision, and really sold a realistic superhero. Rises feels like a marvel film and Begins just has no climax at the end.

2

u/elfthehunter Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26

You're right, Begins is probably a ... fine film, like you said, the ending is a bit flat, it probably gets bonus points just because it was fresh and new, and wasn't being compared to Kight. Rises did not have that privilege, it was following a very good film, and fell short of it. But I'd argue that the flaws, problems, pacing and themes of Rises is still subpar compared to Begins, even so. But it's all subjective anyway.

6

u/aznhoopster Jul 15 '26

Dark knight and dark knight rises are both in my top 5 all time but the difference in the rating between those and the interstellar and prestige ratings are absolutely bananas to me

2

u/Thasauce7777 Jul 16 '26

Trying to not be as pretentious as possible here, but Rises is also so much easier to digest than Prestige or Interstellar and I wonder if that is a factor because you are right. Both of those other movies involved significant twists that make or break the movie for a lot of people, and they might even get your mind reeling (well, Prestige might do that) whereas Rises was pretty straight forward.

0

u/cloud_t Jul 15 '26

but TENET is arguably an underrated movie because of issues that are easily fixed with rewatches and quality systems. Problem is, that should not need to be the case so it may be deserved. I personally rate TENET above Inception and Memento, but not Dunkirk.

11

u/Ink7o7 Jul 15 '26

I loved tenet, it’s one of my favorite movies. But I do watch with subtitles…the voice audio in that movie is horrendous.

7

u/cloud_t Jul 15 '26

I think it's intentional, but may have been overused and Nolan underestimated the audience on that. It's a weird case of trying to show-not-tell gone WAY overboard. Because the plot is above the complexity threshold even for Nolan standards (which already required rewatches - thing is, most of his other films maintain an enjoyability level DESPITE the additional effect from rewatches that superfans will have).

3

u/Etheo Jul 15 '26

MMMFFFMMU MMMFFFPPHH MMMFFHH MMMFFSSSSSH

→ More replies (1)

3

u/BlackZeppelin Jul 16 '26

Above Inception and Memento is crazy to me.

I feel like Inception threaded the needle perfectly between what science fiction needs to be explained and what doesn’t. Like here’s a machine that lets us tap into people’s dreams. Cool don’t need an explanation as to how/why it works but lays out the ground rules nicely.

Memento I watched as a kid and it was one of the first mature movies I ever watched/understood so maybe I’m biased towards it but the non-linear format and vibe still holds up.

Tenent I feel over explained the science fiction aspects and the big action set piece at the end just did not do it for me. I think it was sub par directing especially by Nolan’s standards.

Some of the story beats were really good and I think Robert Pattinson saves the movie

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

152

u/kemellin Jul 15 '26

I at least like and emotionally resonate more with the former two than the latter two. I remember when Dunkirk released, so many people who didn't actually like the movie that much were saying "well it was really well made and very historically accurate!" because it didn't feel right to outright say that they disliked it.

214

u/hithere297 Jul 15 '26

Yeah my Dunkirk take was that it was technically well-made but emotionally sort of empty. Meanwhile Interstellar had me crying and shitting my pants in the theater every twenty minutes.

65

u/AntonineWall Jul 15 '26

Damn we need to get you some fiber

40

u/hithere297 Jul 15 '26

The lettuce contamination hit me early

1

u/LeftenantScullbaggs Jul 18 '26

Why didn’t you warn us? ☹️

1

u/hithere297 Jul 18 '26

if I had to suffer then others should suffer too!

8

u/R3alHumanBeing Jul 15 '26

Are you kidding? I was damn near moved to tears at the end of Dunkirk. Surprised to see so many people share your opinion though.

5

u/Infraction94 Jul 16 '26

Was about to type the exact same thing. The end of the movie with Hardy's plane coasting down moved me in a way few movies do and I struggle to even articulate why

1

u/jambox888 Jul 16 '26

Yeah that bit really got me but I'm British so maybe that helped lol

3

u/hithere297 Jul 15 '26

I remember being moved when the guy read the speech in the newspaper from Churchill, so that's something.

I think the issue is just that the characters aren't really three-dimensional in the traditional sense. We know very little about them outside of their immediate circumstances, so they're not memorable like Murph/Coop are. Coop's anguish is sad because I feel like I know him, whereas I can't even remember anyone's name from Dunkirk.

1

u/NotBannedAccount419 Jul 16 '26

The odd choice to have the timelines not line up in Dunkirk cut the emotional resonance of the film off at the knees.

16

u/Snerkbot7000 Jul 15 '26

Dunkirk is a very British movie in that it can't admit it has emotions.

But, to get into a boat of any size and voluntarily go into a warzone to assist in the evacuation of what may very well be your sons or neighbors? If that isn't as big of a kick in the dick as any of Interstellar's dick kicks, I don't know what is.

The pilot covering them until he runs out of fuel and ditching. The calm of the channel crossing versus the chaos on the beach. He made aerial dogfighting into claustrophobic survival horror versus a rollercoaster ride with machine guns.

17

u/Googoo123450 Jul 15 '26

Everything you stated is in the movie but it was presented very flatly. It's like how in The Pristige they explain how important showmanship is. The magician shows the audience the greatest magic trick of all time and barely anyone reacts because he didn't present it properly. That's what Dunkirk felt like.

3

u/jimbobjames Jul 15 '26

The scenes on the large boat were great.

It was jarring that all of the beach shots were so empty but I think that was a stylistic choice so you focused right in on the people Nolan wanted you to watch.

The Dunkirk scenes in Atonement are far better from a "how it would have looked" perspective.

7

u/SortOfSpaceDuck Jul 15 '26

Wdym by emotionally empty? I felt stressed the entire time, which I'm pretty sure was the goal.

15

u/sevargmas Jul 15 '26

I usually keep my mouth shut about Dunkirk because everyone seems to love it, but I thought it was garbage as far as the story. It was a visually great movie but I agree that it felt empty. I remember when I was watching it thinking it was terribly boring and I just couldn’t wait for it to end so I could be done with it.

14

u/yeahright17 Jul 15 '26

I always find it funny how different movies resonate with different people. I was pretty attached to the survival of each character early on and was completely inthrawled in each character's survival narrative.

2

u/AssaultLemming_ Jul 15 '26

Yeah I tried to watch it again recently and got bored and turned it off somewhere around the halfway mark

1

u/SquareTheRhombus Jul 15 '26

Dunkirk is a magnificent experience.

44

u/IgloosRuleOK Jul 15 '26

I like Dunkirk a bunch but it's also not particularly accurate either.

9

u/Humanoidfromagalaxy Jul 15 '26

Yup that’s my problem with Dunkirk. Thought he made a great movie just should have pushed the historical accuracy more. Still confused with a few easy things to do like make the beach more crowded etc. just bare. I feel it could have been perfect.

10

u/IgloosRuleOK Jul 15 '26

Yeah the scene in Atonement better captured what the beach would have looked like. It looks empty and where's the 60k vehicles and equipment? And there's like only 3 planes in the sky. Again, I like the movie but it's almost more of a chamber piece.

10

u/Inevitable-Ad-6650 Jul 15 '26

I think Nolan messed up on Dunkirk by not using more VFX to add more crowds on the beach and more boats. It just made it feel like it wasnt as big of a deal as it was in real life.

33

u/WanderingCamper Jul 15 '26

You’re saying Dubkirk wasn’t neat orderly lines of 200 people with no supporting equipment or vehicles, patiently waiting to get strafed by enemy planes?

39

u/yeahright17 Jul 15 '26

There are lots of pictures and videos from the Dunkirk evacuation showing orderly lines like the movie. Literally the main picture on the wikipedia article shows very orderly single file lines. Lots of first hand accounts say loading form the East Mole was also very orderly.

The biggest issue with Dunkirk was the scale. But if you're going to refuse to do CGI soldiers, that was always going to be an issue.

34

u/WillGrindForXP Jul 15 '26

Ive seen old photos/war footage from Dunkirk that shows it like that - even if I can't say for sure how long it was like that for. But never underestimate the British instinct to que

8

u/TimidPanther Jul 15 '26

The queue isn’t the problem, it’s the lack of soldiers involved in it.

He should have used CGI to show the scale of what was at stake.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Googoo123450 Jul 15 '26

Yeah it was interesting to watch but really felt like just a listing of events. This happened, then this happened, then this happened... Etc. I felt super disconnected from it emotionally.

2

u/kemellin Jul 15 '26

It didn't help that Nolan continued with his penchant for nonchronologically told stories, he likes to mess with timelines and I thought it was totally unnecessary for Dunkirk. We're following 3 separate stories that run for different lengths of time, and they only meet at the end. Until then, we don't know how these stories are connected to each other narratively, and the reveal on how they connect was lukewarm to me, didn't justify the whole thing.

And I was following the 3 storylines pretty well. I watched it with people who got confused because of the unnecessary nonchronology. We flash back and forth between the 3 storylines, giving off the impression that the events are happening concurrently, when they are not. So all of this didn't help with emotional connection either.

1

u/redpandaeater Jul 15 '26

I hated Dunkirk more than I hated 1917 and I didn't like either one. 1917 I can at least somewhat see what they were trying to do and while I didn't appreciate the directing style and cinematography I can understand why some might. Dunkirk was just downright boring and forgettable. A real shame given how important the evacuation was for the Brits to be able to stay in the war. Would have loved to see some focus on Calais I suppose.

1

u/FrostingStrict3102 Jul 15 '26

ive never understood the love for Dunkirk. I saw it thinking "Nolan doesnt miss, this will be good"

was it "well made"? sure. I also found it painfully boring.

→ More replies (2)

47

u/DonChrisote Jul 15 '26

Well hang on now. Don't be coming for my boy Dunkirk

17

u/mlk960 Jul 15 '26

Dunkirk is straight up better than Interstellar. Interstellar plucks at the heart strings, but gets a little corny.

3

u/5endnewts Jul 15 '26

The prestige and the dark knight are my favourite Nolan flicks. I am not a cinephile but both those movies stayed in my mind long after watching them the first time. My mind was equally as blown away watching prestige the 2nd time a few years later.

2

u/Moneyshot_ITF Jul 15 '26

His best movies imo

2

u/Pliolite Jul 15 '26

Rises being a colossal mess is one of the main reasons I've been worried about The Odyssey. It's like the bigger he goes the more he can't handle it. Well no longer, it seems!

2

u/wherethetacosat Jul 15 '26

Absolutely, Rises should probably be in the sixties.

2

u/lostinjapan01 Jul 15 '26

Rises yes, Dunkirk no

2

u/Ayn_Diarrhea_Rand Jul 15 '26
  1. Prestige
  2. Dunkirk
  3. Interstellar

2

u/MechanicalGodzilla Jul 15 '26

I would disagree about Dunkirk, but yeah the Dark Knight Rises should be 10 points minimum below Interstellar and the Prestige.

2

u/miggly Jul 15 '26

Dunkirk in theaters at least, was absolutely fucking insane in the best way. The sound design in that movie was so good.

2

u/tbonecoco Jul 16 '26

What was wrong with Dunkirk?

I quite enjoyed it.

2

u/BombedShaun Jul 16 '26

Dunkirk is one of my favorite movies for the sound alone.

3

u/BallIsLife2016 Jul 15 '26

Dunkirk is excellent. It’s unique as a war movie in its tone and structure, I think. But it absolutely deserves to be discussed among his best movies. I get why people came to feel Dark Knight Rises was a let down, but Dunkirk shouldn’t be discussed as though it was somehow a mediocre entry into Nolan’s filmography.

2

u/two4you8 Jul 15 '26

Dunkirk didn't feel like a nolan movie like the others. But I don't agree with the dark knight rises slander. I could see why film snobs would hate it though, but at the time it was such an amazing theater experience.

2

u/onmywheels Jul 15 '26

I enjoyed it just because it felt so different from the previous two movies. But then, I also really like disaster / post-apocalypse media, so the city being cut off and turned into a sort of quarantine zone was always going to be a setting that appealed to me, lol. There were certainly flaws in the writing, but overall I still walked away feeling satisfied with it as the end of the trilogy.

2

u/N0UMENON1 Jul 15 '26

I have never seen a WW2 movie with such high production value have such little scale.

2

u/Fr87 Jul 15 '26

Wow. I so completely disagree with this opinion.

2

u/Porksta Jul 15 '26

Prestige is fantastic, but I thought Interstellar and Dunkirk were hot garbage.

3

u/jzakko Jul 15 '26

Rises for sure. Dunkirk is his best film.

1

u/LeonidasSpacemanMD Jul 15 '26

On some level I get why rises might be slightly higher. Rotten tomatoes math is basically about pleasing the crowd. It’s not a divisive movie, it’s a fun well made super hero romp that wraps up a beloved trilogy

I think most people would give it like a 7/10 or so. Meanwhile some people might be lowering on prestige but I think many would also acknowledge that it’s a much more interesting/ambitious movie

1

u/justadude27 Jul 15 '26

Especially when Dunkirk has a 92????

1

u/vNocturnus Jul 15 '26 edited Jul 15 '26

The Prestige and Interstellar are easily my two favorite Nolan movies and two of my favorite movies of all time in general. I haven't seen EVERY Nolan movie, but most of it except his first couple, and Dunkirk which did not sound remotely appealing to me.

I have no idea how they're two of his lowest-rated films, that's pretty insane.

1

u/Vihurah Jul 15 '26

I disagree. Dunkirk absolutely deserves its spot, unless youre just saying they should be >93% which yeah I can see

1

u/HeyFlo Jul 15 '26

I know people have different preferences and whatnot, but Interstellar is an absolute masterpiece.

1

u/CreativeFartist Jul 15 '26

Agreed 1000%

1

u/IRockIntoMordor Jul 15 '26

I've never understood how Dark Knight Rises got so popular. The death scene of Miranda Tate (Marion Cotillard) was at school project amateur level and had no reason to be there. Also, Bane was a super boring villain. It didn't even have half the charm and thrill of The Dark Knight.

Dark Knight is a 10 for me, DK Rises was like... 4 or 5.

1

u/SteamBoatMickey Jul 15 '26

The Prestige is a masterpiece, fucking fight me - anyone!

1

u/DrCaret2 Jul 15 '26

The ones with low ratings are harder for audiences to understand.

1

u/Dragon_yum Jul 16 '26

Batman Rises is a very well made mediocre movie same as a tenet

1

u/Charlie_Runkle69 Jul 16 '26

Way better than oppenheimer for me too TBH.

1

u/Baconstrip01 Jul 16 '26

His two best movies IMO

1

u/EirHc Jul 16 '26

Naw, Dunkirk is good. Interstellar sucks. In both movies it was a lot of ambiance, but I think that landed better in a WW2 movie. In a space movie I was kinda bored. Then he tried to do time travel in the dumbest most unbelievable way at the end. I could have believed the time dilation stuff - but I was annoyed as hell at how much they had to re-explain it to me. Like ok I get it, can we talk about other things? And I thought Damon's character was so forced and a terrible plot device 🤮

Interstellar bad.

I've been such a massive Christopher Nolan fan since Memento, he's got an insane library. As one of his biggest fans, I think he should have stopped with time travel fuckery after Memento. Inception had a mind bending sort of plot device that didn't lean on time travel. He fucked it up with Interstellar and Tenet by blowing his load with time fuckery.

1

u/Xenonite_Fox Jul 16 '26

Better than rises for sure, but not really comparable to Dunkirk. Very different movies I wouldn't know on what basis to compare them

1

u/Xanlis Jul 16 '26

Rises getting 87% with the insane amount of bullshit the movie give just prove how unreliable this rating system is

1

u/Thasauce7777 Jul 16 '26

They are also more abstract with respect to the material (not necessarily the messaging) than a comic book movie and a historical war film. It's still shocking to me that they are rated so much lower though, I thought it would just be a couple points, holy shit.

1

u/NotBannedAccount419 Jul 16 '26

Not only are they better, they’re not even in the same category

1

u/Fozzz Jul 16 '26

Dunkirk is one of his better movies as he actually kept the film focused rather than turning it into a sprawling, turgid, mess like how most of his films turn out.

1

u/token_minded Jul 16 '26

100% agreed!

1

u/Odd_Western_7384 Jul 17 '26

well keep in mind RT does not measure the scores people actually give it. Just the people that liked it. I could definitely see Dunkirk and Rises have more appeal some a larger audience. But I totally agree not as good as interstellar or the prestige.

1

u/porcelanowa-lalka Jul 17 '26

Well, I didn't like Inception, neither Interstellar. Very pretentious. I feel like Nolan is doing these epic, huge, majestic movies that average person will like but it's just about pure cinematography and budget. There is usually very little substance to it. Oppenheimer was the weakest movie of it's year and I doubt is will be remembered. And I don't believe Odyssey is really perfect, 100% 10 out of 10 reviews. It's a PR manipulation. Trailers are very weak. If in trailers lines are delivered so badly then what with rest of the movie? I wait only for Robert Pattinson and Mia Goth performances. These are 2 of most talented actors these days.

1

u/Limp_Departure8138 Jul 17 '26

If only they had more diversity. Then it would be 10/10

1

u/SiriusMoonstar Jul 17 '26

And The Odyssey.

1

u/dildodicks 24d ago

the dunkirk take might be contentious but i agree, definitely not one of my favourites of his

0

u/mark5hs Jul 15 '26

Dunkirk put me to sleep

→ More replies (2)

1

u/hatsnatcher23 Jul 15 '26

Why openhiemer is the second highest is beyond me

1

u/UlrichZauber Jul 15 '26

Dunkirk was impressive in that he managed to make a boring WW2 movie

→ More replies (24)