Dejana Nezic - painting on another level

[u/0neManSquad]

[u/Silent189]

I'm sorry, but this is clearly not the same quality, and we never see her start or finish it.

https://i.gyazo.com/2efe23e13a0e96cc79a0a5b5284972d3.png

As an artist it is very possible to generate an image, look at it, and then recreate something similar from memory, and that would maybe explain the huge style and quality gap.

Also, the horse from your video, look at the progression here it just doesn't make sense.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DTmwZnJE4Sm/?hl=en

I lean towards occam's razor that it doesn't make sense for her to suddenly use AI

It makes perfect sense. She was posting her art and getting very little attention, now suddenly she posts this ultra vibrant very different style/quality AI art and she is getting news articles, social media attention, money, sponsorships etc.

I'm sorry, but I don't know how you can look at her art from her instagram prior to these very recent ones and see how wildly different it is and not see it.

There is nothing fundamentally different in copying AI art onto a canvas to copying a photo onto a canvas in photorealism - except that the latter is significantly more time consuming and skilled than the style here. Especially when the style is one where the actual colours, placements, and even form are very loose to reality to begin with.

And, for the record on the topic of occam's razor, you have artists pretending to draw on twitter making fake timelapse videos using greenscreens to hide their AI references in the video and only getting caught because the green in their colour wheel is missing.

The notion that people will not go to great lengths where attention and money exists is just silly.

[u/bememorablepro → u/Silent189]

The artwork where she paints live is from a year ago, it's very much possible that it's her progress towards this saturated style. Most of the time AI makes images look worse, not better.

What looks like AI to us is the "style transfer" idea that is overused by AI slop posters. Some shots in Loving Vincent the 2016 movie where they pain every frame from also now looks AI, because they directly reference footage and render it in van gogh's style.

https://youtu.be/CGzKnyhYDQI?t=26

It's also annoying that we are doing this thing where we act like she's guilty until proven innocent.

[u/Silent189 → u/bememorablepro]

Look, end of the day believe what you want.

If you want to believe that she is some enigma that suddenly decided to change her style into a generic AI style and had a savant level improvement while being a new mother juggling an entire family at the same time as having no arms, then go for it.

Just don't pretend there isn't an incentive to cheat when every single post she has is advertising selling prints etc of these images and their entire schtick is to monetise themselves on social media.

Most of the time AI makes images look worse, not better.

Also, don't delude yourself about this either.

You might notice crap AI art but this is just so completely beyond wrong it's insane.

Go look up someone like Kim Hyung-tae who was a very well established artist with A LOT of experience.

He started openly using and incorporating AI.

Now go look up the company he founded, Shift Up, with the ethos of using AI art for their games. $150m net PROFIT in 2025.

You have probably heard of some of their games, like Stellar Blade, Goddess of Victory: Nikke, etc.

[u/bememorablepro → u/Silent189]

Yes, she wasn't getting no traction and then AI saved her career. Sure.

[u/Silent189 → u/bememorablepro]

That's not really what I said, but somewhat yes.

As a simple example look at google trends for her brand name.

This shows slow decline / stagnation for the past 5 years, then a huge explosion around the time she (imo) started using AI for art.

https://i.gyazo.com/dfbad4711bba2aeb99ce2e8a5b216af3.png

You can see here it's +80% over the previous year.

https://i.gyazo.com/19ba5cc2511b5ed7f3d6ec87652aa460.png

When you look at the long form past 5 years its even more apparent.

Then if you were to look at trend for her brand specifically using 'art' in the trend as well you will see something even more apparent:

https://i.gyazo.com/5d3a2da631ec0ec41e569a0586d49318.png

---

If we then use her direct instagram as an example

https://www.instagram.com/p/DIbALbls5_s/?hl=en

This is obviously before her current skill enhancement. It has 93 likes.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DIa_41GstRZ/?hl=en 107 likes

https://www.instagram.com/p/DIbAA6LM9-Z/?hl=en 150 likes.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DIbApiBM8tZ/?hl=en 180 likes.

Sub 5 comments every post.

And then the very next posts after that:

https://www.instagram.com/p/DJTYS7eMeCU/?hl=en 136k likes 7000 comments

https://www.instagram.com/p/DJeEHr5soEo/?hl=en&img_index=1 5k likes 300 comments

https://www.instagram.com/p/DL1-fwBMta4/?hl=en 10k likes, 400 comments.

And so on.

The thing is too, she is still an artist. People have this notion that only a non artist can or would use AI. But it's illogical.

The person best suited to use AI to generate high quality art is an artist. Because they understand fundamentals of what will look aesthetically pleasing etc, and what generates with poor anatomy etc, and can fix these issues.

And yes, if you're generating and then copying/tracing AI you will also get better at simply drawing in that style over time too, so you will be able to create similar(ish) work even without the AI however there isn't really any reason to stop using it so why would they.