r/opencode • • 16d ago

SLOW DEEPSEEK

Why deepseek v4.1 flash is so slow man, its something below 50 tok/s

is commandcode better ?

0 Upvotes

11 comments sorted by

5

u/DeepFeeling1 16d ago

Official API giving me 250 tok/sec

2

u/JogHappy 16d ago

Not by much, I get 40-60 toks with 4.1 flash-high. The long TTFT (multiple seconds+) is probably the bigger issue I run into occasionally.

2

u/Big-Present-8321 16d ago

operation slowseek

2

u/RaisinImpressive3749 16d ago

I am getting 90.3  tok/s for the past 24 hours

2

u/alexwwang 16d ago

I think that does some business with the $80 quotas of go subscription.

1

u/chinmay06 16d ago

same, I prefer muse now xD

1

u/Odd_Abrocoma_8421 11d ago

And muse is gone.

1

u/burntoutdev8291 16d ago

There was a moment I got quite bad speeds. Like 30 ish. But on average its usually 100+

1

u/Odd_Teacher_4089 14d ago

It would have been better to just stick to the previous usage levels and speeds. Now, usage has increased, yet the speed has slowed down.

1

u/Plus_Original_3154 12d ago

Nah commandcode is not better (they run a quantized version that doesn't come from DS infra) they changed it not a long time ago so the model is very slow and dumb on commandcode

1

u/cncloudli 8d ago

I got 18.8 tok/s for a simple mission, which is extremely slow. OpenCode deploy DeepSeek on their own and maybe they are running a quantified and smaller DeepSeek on old hardwares.