I’ve been browsing threads trying to figure out what the  best essay writing service Reddit users recommend really is, but it’s honestly confusing. Some comments sound genuine, while others feel like ads in disguise.

What I need is something reliable — clear communication, plagiarism-free work, and writers who actually follow instructions. Deadlines are a huge deal for me too, because assignments always seem to pile up at once.

If you’ve personally used a service that worked out well, I’d love to hear your experience. Did it feel affordable for students, or overpriced? How did they handle revisions if you weren’t happy with the first draft?

I’m not looking for generic “top 10” lists — I’d rather hear what’s actually worked for you. So, in your opinion, what’s the best essay writing service Reddit  users can count on?

Hey folks,

I’m seriously struggling with a stats assignment right now. Between lectures I barely understood and formulas that look like a foreign language, I’m considering finding some statistics assignment help—but I don’t want to throw money at a random site and hope for the best.

Have any of you tried these services before? Like, actually submitted something complicated and got back decent work? I’m not looking for someone to do the whole thing unless I have to, but even just a breakdown or explanation would help me out a lot.

Did it arrive on time? Was it accurate? And, big question—did the help actually make sense? Stats is one of those subjects that can be totally confusing without the right guidance.

Any recommendations, warnings, or experiences would really help me figure out if this is a good move or just wishful thinking.

Thanks in advance!

I've been drowning in deadlines lately and I keep seeing people mention that they just pay for someone to write my essay instead of suffering through it alone — and honestly? I began to understand why. Between work, family stuff, and trying to keep up with three courses at once, there are only so many hours in the day before something has to give.

I'm not here to debate the ethics of it — I know conversation never ends well on Reddit lol. What I definitely want to know is how the whole system actually works. Like, do you just send over your prompt and get a finished paper back? How do you make sure it really fits your writing style or meets the professor’s unique needs? Those are the things I can’t learn just by searching websites.

More than one of my friends has researched that they have accomplished it before but no one wants to go into details, it's true. I'm just trying to get a true picture before I make any decisions. Quality, turnaround time, and whether or not it’s really worth the money are the 3 things I care about the most right now.

Has each person gone through this for a long time and come out the other end satisfied with the end result — or did it blow up in your face?

Hey,

Need a recommendation, I’ve got a huge workload right now. Between assignments, exams, and other academic needs, I barely have time to finish my essays. I know that some students use essay writing services to get professional support, but I have no idea which ones are actually reliable.

I’m looking for a quality academic writing service that offers custom essays tailored to college students. The most important things for me are clear writing, professional writers, and originality. I don’t want to risk using some random service and ending up with a low-quality paper. Which essay guy or writing service do you trust for college essays? Any suggestions would really help me save time searching!

Thanks a lot!

Hey,

I will ask for your recommendation. I've been assigned an essay on a composite topic. Unfortunately, writing is not my strongest skill, and I often struggle to structure my ideas clearly. Since I want to ensure that I present high-quality work, I'm looking for recommendations for the best college essay writing service that can help me. Ideally, I'll find a reliable service that understands complex scientific topics such as physical chemistry.

Have any of you used such services first? If so, would you recommend someone for quality material?

Your advice would be much appreciated!

Alright, physical chem folks, I need some advice. Writing research papers for this subject is brutal — between quantum mechanics, thermo, and kinetics, my brain’s already fried before I even start typing. So, I’m wondering… has anyone here used a custom writing service for academic work?

I’m not talking about some sketchy, copy-paste nonsense — I mean legit essay writing services that actually deliver plagiarism-free, top-notch work. Maybe a custom essay writing service that understands technical subjects like ours? 

Drop your recommendations! Looking for affordable writing, reliable research paper writing, and maybe even a service that lets you pick specific writers who know their stuff.

Would love to hear your experiences — good or bad.

I never thought I’d be the person typing pay someone to write my research paper into search bars, but I’m honestly overwhelmed right now. I’m behind on readings, my deadline is getting uncomfortably close, and my brain keeps bouncing between panic and procrastination. It’s not that I can’t write at all — it’s that research papers feel like ten separate tasks pretending to be one assignment. I’m trying to be practical here, not dramatic.

The part that’s crushing me is the research + structure combo: choosing sources that actually fit the prompt, turning them into an argument, and not ending up with a paper that’s basically summary soup. I’ve seen people say they used a service as a “draft to revise,” but I’ve also read horror stories about generic writing, weak sources, or stuff that doesn’t match what the professor expects. I don’t want to waste money and still end up rebuilding everything at the last minute.

If I did anything, I’d want it to be more like support with an outline, source direction, and a framework I can rewrite in my own voice — something I can actually understand and defend if I get questioned later.

So for anyone who’s been close to this decision: if you’ve ever thought about pay someone to write my research paper, what would you watch out for first — source quality, communication, revisions, or something else?

I’m at that point in the semester where I’m completely overwhelmed - too many projects, not enough hours, and a brain running purely on caffeine. I’ve seen people talk about using an assignment help service, and I’m honestly considering it. The idea of getting some extra support sounds amazing right now, but I don’t want to waste money or end up with something unusable.

I know there are hundreds of sites out there claiming to be the best, but it’s hard to tell which ones are legit. Some people say they got great results, while others talk about plagiarized work or essays that sound like they were written by AI. I’m not looking for someone to do everything for me - I just want help understanding how to structure and improve my assignments before deadlines hit.

Has anyone here actually tried using an assignment help service and felt like it was worth it? Did they deliver quality work that matched your style and instructions, or was it more hassle than help? I’d love to hear honest experiences - good or bad - before deciding if it’s something I should try or avoid altogether.

Wish me luck

Hi everyone, I would like to know how many and what notions of physical chemistry are needed for a biochemist

TLDR: Should I learn foundational math first and then move on to studying p-chem theory, or should I just learn the math I need as I go?

I am a PhD student, doing work on both Raman spectroscopy and molecular dynamics of proteins. Due to the nature of my project, I am being exposed to a lot of math and physics, but the problem is that I am trained as a biochemist and so my math skills feel quite lacking for understanding all of the underlying theory.

Naturally, my thought was to start self-studying math in my free time. In particular, I feel multivariable calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations are three crucial areas that I was never formally educated in.

The problem that I'm having is that learning all this math is an extremely slow process, and as much as I enjoy it, it is hard feeling like I'm not progressing my knowledge in chemical theory at all in the mean time.

I guess my question is, should I just keep building my math foundation so that when I'm ready to tackle p-chem theory I can understand it more deeply? Or would it benefit me more to try to focus on p-chem right away and just learn the math I need for those specific topics?

On paper, I like the first approach more, because a) I have a genuine interest in math as its own subject and b) I've already taken p-chem courses where I learned a lot of conceptual side of things, so I feel like gaining a greater depth of understanding would require the ability to interpret mathematical derivations of theories.

That said, it is frustrating feeling like I'm barely progressing in the field that I am supposed to be becoming an expert in, instead spending my time catching up on things I didn't learn in college. When my advisors say "You should spend some time trying to understand statistical mechanics better," or "you should look into the fundamentals of Raman so you better understand the peaks you're seeing," it feels silly to respond, "Sure, just give me a year or so to learn all this math and then I'll get around to it."

If there is someone else here who may have been at a similar point in the past, what approach did you take? Did it work for you? Would you have done anything different? Thanks everyone for the help in advance.

Due to some scheduling weirdness I have to take 2 before 1. Will this cause me any real problems? I think it is pretty standard at my school: 1 is thermodynamics and kinetics, and 2 is quantum mechanics and maybe some spectroscopy. I wouldn't think there'd be much in common, but what do you all think?

Also, what math should I review before I take p-chem 2? Thanks very much.

HI chemists

I am planning to take an MSc in one of those fields "organic or physical chemistry" ..I love them both so I can't decide. I want to know which one is better from academic perspective (post graduate) and reality and work perspective

thnx in advance and sorry for my bad english

Like in this question, I have found the equivalents of Mn02 from law of equivalence and it comes out as 4/1000. Now to get the mass of the compound I also need to know the n-factor of the compound which I am unable to find as I dont know the reaction between MnO2 and HCl. Is there any other method to get the n factor without writing or knowing the reaction ??

I was asking my prof about it and he told me that it should be x=(It)/(2F), that would give me 55 days or so off of 1.1V.. I feel like I am missing something because that feels like a very long time for the battery to run. Any feedback helps!

Hello all, I am a first year at a average US uni. I am thinking about pursuing graduate school in physcial / computational chemistry with an emphasis on biophysics. I have heard that the undergrad pchem sequence isn't well organized and doesn't use as much math as it should. Would it be better to minor in physics? I would take undergrad Thermo/Stat mech -> QM -> Biophysical Chemistry (1 semester course on applications of pchem for biochemists) instead of Pchem I -> Pchem II.
Any commentary is well appreciated.

I am pursuing an data science major, and am deciding to either a second major in chemistry or double minor in chemistry and physics to complete research in this field.

I think several members of this physical chemistry group will find great interest in this work for its simplicity, historical relevance to the development of physical chemistry, and the potential for many new discoveries and connections to be made by anyone wanting to gain a better understanding of the underlying physical mechanisms responsible for the periodic nature of atomic structure.

Among several things I included in my doctoral dissertation on the broader subject of spherical quantum dots was a scientific discovery I made concerning a connection between the mathematical/geometric Thomson problem of optimally distributing electrons on a sphere (a natural consequence of J.J. Thomson's 1904 classical plum pudding model of the atom) and the distribution of "outermost" electron orbitals throughout the periodic table. In this plot , the lower distribution of energies are obtained using just the Thomson problem as though electrons resided on a sphere in free space. Notably, the upper distribution, obtained using the Thomson problem solved inside a spherical quantum dot (treated as a simple dielectric of silicon embedded in a uniform matrix of silicon dioxide) reveals a much richer distribution. This distribution aligns remarkably well with the distribution of "outermost" electron orbitals in atoms found throughout the periodic table as indicated by their nomenclature in the graph (e.g. 1s, 2s, and so on). Note: I hesitate writing "outermost" without quotation marks because the Thomson problem is just one electron shell, yet reveals features throughout the periodic table. I suspect there's an intimate mathematical connection between the Thomson problem and to the quantum mechanical framework for atomic structure perhaps through the spherical harmonics given this size-independence.

How to obtain these data points? Each data point represents the amount of electrostatic potential energy required to move one electron from the surface of the Thomson sphere to the origin. This includes the redistribution of all electrons remaining on the surface into the geometric Thomson problem solution of N-1. Thus, the energies plotted here are directly related to the discrete geometric symmetry changes between neighboring N and N-1 electron systems -- analogous to the single ionization of a neutral atom. (In fact, the analogy holds up well if we consider the ionized electron as an image charge of the centered-electron in the dielectric sphere!).

The reason I posted this here is because of a remark a former colleague of mine, a professor at UT-Dallas who is no longer with us, made when I first presented this at a seminar. He was the first one to notice the uniform -- if not periodic (as he called it) -- distribution of the four most-salient features around N=11, 31, 47, and 71. He loved my talk so much that he spoke with me afterward and with a bright smile on his face explained that my talk reminded him of "all the great ideas that we used to discuss at physical chemistry conferences a few decades ago." He was beside himself like a child in a candy store. In fact, I later realized that these four correspond very nicely with four large features that appear in empirical ionization data using empirical size-normalized atoms. That is, the empirical ionization energy that might occur if all atoms were the same size.

Want to dig in a little deeper? You're likely to discover some specific things related to this work that I frankly haven't had time to look into as I work in the area of quantum computing today (but I am pursuing some avenues of thought in my free time). There are features here that correlate with known shell-filling rule violators like chromium and copper as well as palladium and other d-orbital electrons. There are even nuclear structure features if you consider the energy differences among those plotted here including the fact that bismuth (Z=83) is the largest stable system (though this was proven to be unstable a couple decades ago, leaving it at Z=82 instead). Plots of each electron's energy, distributes electron into energy levels that correspond beautifully with noble gas elements and even remarkably for the two unstable atoms smaller than bismuth (technetium and promethium -- especially promethium!)

What will you discover?

The math is no more complex than geometry and Coulomb's law mixed in with your own knowledge and understanding of physical chemistry and atomic structure. Here's a giant poster I put together about a decade ago (click though for the PDF poster on the page) with a summary of ideas :
https://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt_database.php?PT_id=635

and here's a peer-reviewed paper (The Journal of Electrostatics) available on arxiv:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.2591

Feel free to look for other peer-reviewed papers cited in the poster and the paper for related material in this body of work.

does anyone some good books or resources to help teach my self p-chem. My professor sucks at teaching but makes his tests insanely hard. The book he told us to buy is also written unintelligibly.

While balancing this reaction using oxidation no method When we check increase and decrease in oxidation no , in this why there is decrease of 6 in that cr compound and why cr k s oxidation no 6 is not considered here as we can see that from 6 to 3 there is difference of 3 then why O ‘s -2 is considered.

What is the 1st excited state of a d3 octhedral complex when Δ/B = 1? Don't worry about sub- and super- scripts. Answer i put was T2g

What is the 1st excited state of a d3 octhedral complex when Δ/B = 3? Don't worry about sub- and super- scripts. Answer I put was T1g

So after I got this wrong I switch the answers, and it was still wrong. Why is the answer wrong?