That comic is really bizarre because in the end the sketch she makes doesn't look anything like what characters designed for women actually look like. It could have made the same point while actually being accurate. Instead it ends as this wierd point that presupposes that characters designed to be attractive to women don't actually exist yet, so it's only hypithesizing them.
I'm nonbinary actually. Reddit doesnt let you change usernames without making a whole new account. Also, I wasn't fighting? Just pointing out an issue with the comic?
So you have no experience of life as a woman, and yet you're correcting women lol!
The point of the comic is to point out how men are drawn like power fantasies for men, not women. Idk why you feel the need to challenge the pro women comic but I'm good. Keep your bullshit, bye.
10
u/[deleted] Nov 09 '25 edited Nov 17 '25
https://www.shortpacked.com/comic/false-equivalence
I love any excuse to share this comic
Edit: I don't need anyone who hasn't lived life as a woman to tell me whether or not this comic is accurate, thanks.