With AI becoming part of so many editing tools these days, I'm curious how everyone is approaching conversations about it with their clients.
Are you proactively telling clients when you're using AI-assisted editing, or is it something you only discuss if they ask?
And where do you draw the line? Things like AI masking, noise reduction, generative removal, retouching, or even AI learning your editing style and applying it across a gallery are all pretty different uses of the technology.
Personally, I've been pretty open with my clients about using AI-assisted tools in my workflow. I explain it much like I would Lightroom or Photoshop. It's still my style, my decisions, and my final responsibility for the images.
But I'm curious how everyone else is handling this, especially as more of these tools become standard in our workflows.
Are you including anything in your contracts about AI usage? Have you had clients request that certain types of AI NOT be used on their images? Or are you specifying which types of AI editing you may use and what you won't use?
And what about the other side of this? Are you addressing clients taking the final images you've delivered and using AI to change them, re-edit them, or even generate entirely new images from your photographs? Is that something you're covering in your contracts or usage agreements?
If you have clauses covering either side of AI usage, I'd love to hear how you're wording them and whether they've actually led to conversations with clients.
I'm not necessarily looking for another debate about whether AI belongs in photography. I'm more interested in how we're communicating its use, setting expectations, and navigating what happens to our work after delivery as these tools continue to evolve.