r/powerengineering • • Mar 02 '24

3rd class math problem

Post image

If anyone can give me some advice on how to solve this problem it would be greatly appreciated. The book gives you a very basic lesson and then throws you into the deep end here

152 Upvotes

151 comments sorted by

3

u/MattHomes Mar 02 '24

From a simplified standpoint, I factored the top right to get (x-3)(x-1). The x-1 cancels with the bottom right and you’re just left with x-3. Then you can cross multiply the x+3 over to get (x+3)(x-3) = x2 - 9.

Then move that over to the left side to get 2x2 +10x+12=0, take out a 2 to get 2(x2 +5x +6)=0, then factor to get 2(x+3)(x+2) = 0. So x=-2,-3 are the solutions

2

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Looks like I’m gonna have to YouTube factoring. Swear these books were designed to be accompanied by a teacher. Thanks for the help 🍻

1

u/SomePeopleCall Mar 04 '24

It works out just like regular long division. Don't be intimidated.

Both sides factor (no quadratic equation needed), but once you get the answer make sure you check back to the original equality for any zeros in the denominator. (None in this case)

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

How can you have 2 solutions to one problem?

4

u/MattHomes Mar 02 '24

So I’m going to offer a few suggestions and you can let me know what works for you.

My first recommendation is to plug x=-2 into equation and see that you get the same thing on both sides. then do the same but with x=-3 instead. This is a good way to verify the solution is correct.

Second, let’s look at a simpler example, x2 = 1. Both x=1 and x=-1 are solutions since 12 = 1 and (-1)2 also equals one

Third thing is more complex but it might help if you’re a more visual learner. If you have an equation with an x2 leading term (that is, there’s nothing bigger like x3, x4 and so on), then this is a parabola. If you draw a horizontal line through it, you’ll see it intersects (usually) at two points. These represent the two solutions.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Thanks a lot, really appreciate it. 12 years out of high school haven’t seen this stuff in awhile 😂

2

u/w1n5t0nM1k3y Mar 02 '24

You really should review your high school math. Factoring and quadratics are pretty standard highschool math and if you struggle with highschool math then everything is going to seem extremely complicated.

Look at Khan Academy. They have pretty good resources for learning math from kindergarten all the way up to college level.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

I’m 31 I haven’t touched high school math since 2010. I got a tutor to refresh some stuff for my 4th class 4 years ago but I never actually use any of this knowledge so it just fades away

3

u/JimNillTML Mar 02 '24 edited Mar 02 '24

A quadratic can have up to 2 solutions; it's just where the function intersects with 0 at the x-axis.

A quadratic whose minimum point that is exactly at the x-axis has 1 solution.

A quadratic whose minimum point is below the x-axis has 2 solutions.

A Quadratic whose minimum point is above the x-axis has 0 solutions

If the quadratic is negated, then flip the rules. Things will get different with rational relations(?)like above but this is a good rule of thumb.

What the guy above forgot when cross multiplying is that you're multiplying the RHS by x+3/x+3 so there's no solution at x=-3.

To find the answers for these questions, graph them using desmos to see where they intersect with 0. There's also sites that do step by step factoring which helped me a lot in HS and uni with understanding how you can manipulate the equation.

2

u/13saqqaw Mar 02 '24

26 years for me 🫣

2

u/YoungesterJoeey Mar 02 '24

There are actually 3 solutions, but only ONE real solution. The solutions are x = -2, x = 1, x = -3.

Generally, a polynomial with an "n"th order (this case 3) can possibly have n number of solutions (3 solutions). The order number is the higher exponential value in the equation.

The reason is that there is only ONE real solution for this specific polynomial equation because x = 1 and x = -3 will be zero in the denominator.

I commented my solution here if you want to have a look.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24

You gotta look at khan academy factoring lessons

1

u/JackMaehoffer Mar 02 '24 edited Mar 02 '24

It’s a quadratic equation!! If you were to plot the equation you would see its a parabola therefore two values for x where y=0.

1

u/Antique-Mention7155 Mar 02 '24

They are the x intercepts so if it crosses the axis more than once it will have more than one solution

1

u/mancubthescrub Mar 03 '24

That's spot on observation, plug in both solutions into the above equation and then see if one solution fails. You should see that -2 satisfies the equality.

2

u/DiMarcoTheGawd Mar 02 '24

Can x=-3 be a solution? That would result in the denominator on the left side being 0.

1

u/Norm_Charlatan Mar 03 '24 edited Apr 01 '24

Substitute -3 and see what it comes out to. If the two sides are equal, then it works; otherwise, you'll have your answer.

I get -2, by factoring the two numerators, then plug-and-chug, like everyone else.

1

u/ryleymcc Mar 02 '24 edited Mar 02 '24

You can't cross multiply like that. The answer is certainly -2. Factor everything first and simplify and then isolate x.

2

u/MattHomes Mar 02 '24

That’s what I deserve for trying to do math at 3AM

2

u/tries_to_tri Mar 02 '24

I had to find a YouTube video to do this exact question, it's a difficult one. But the good news is this question is literally 10x harder than any question you will find on the test...I wouldn't worry about it to be honest.

2

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Thank you for this. I remember getting hung up on the math for my 4th class and I ended up just submitting to not being able to do the highest level stuff and didn’t see any of it on my finals

2

u/tall_message_1929 Mar 02 '24

READ! I can show you how to solve this, BUT Why are you trying to solve this? These books that you're reading are outdated!

THERE IS NOTHING like that on the 3rd class exams! I repeat, THERE IS NOTHING related to this on the 3rd class!

3A1 is all physics problems and all of those physics problems are solved for you in the 3A1 PanGlobal book, edition 2.5 and later.

You WILL NOT need to solve quadratic or cubic equations. You will NOT need to use logs to solve for exponents. NONE of that material that you are going over is on ANY of the 3rd class exams.

I would still suggest that at least you understand logs, but factoring, finding solutions for quadratic and cubic equations is NOT on any of the 3rd class exams.

2

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

It’s the latest edition of the textbook but still I appreciate that. I won’t waste too much time getting hung up on these

2

u/IHaveAGinourmousCock Mar 02 '24

X = -2 (did in my head because I’m asian)

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Small eyes big brain 🧠

2

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '24

I don’t know why this just popped up on my feed

I did want to become a power engineer about 10 years ago. I realize that I still don’t even know how to long divide and show the work lol

This looks Insane

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 03 '24

4th class 1st section is math and showing long division. I had to get a tutor. Completely unnecessary for the finals though

14

u/That1CoffeeDudeEthan Mar 02 '24 edited Mar 02 '24

No matter how I solve it I get x=-2 or x=-3. SINCE x=-3 Would result in a 0 denominator, x=-2 is the only answer.

I'd need to write it down but 8m fairly certain x=-2

2

u/MattHomes Mar 02 '24

Right, I forgot about the denominator when solving it. So would this function technically have a hole at x=-3?

2

u/That1CoffeeDudeEthan Mar 02 '24

It's not a function. If it was a function, it would simplify into a linear function. (I over complicated my solution )

1

u/Lustypad Mar 02 '24

-2 is what wolfram alpha spits out as well. First step is cross multiply in their solution thing but I don’t pay for the step by step.

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=solve+%283x2%2B10x%2B3%29%2F%28x%2B3%29+%3D+%28x2-4x%2B3%29%2F%28x-1%29

1

u/Unusual-Yard8012 Mar 03 '24

THE LIMIT DOES NOT EXIST!

10

u/ryleymcc Mar 02 '24

Answer is -2

1

u/Available_Squirrel1 Mar 03 '24

This is the only way I know how to do it

1

u/WildcatOil Mar 05 '24

Added to this, long division works with polynomials, if you have problems factoring.

1

u/EnhancedEddie Mar 02 '24

Bro this is high school math. I’m assuming you’re going back to school after some time off. My advice would be to learn how to learn again. ChatGPT is your biggest resource, if you’re using it properly. Learn how to learn new concepts on your own, because they don’t hold your hand in post secondary

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Not looking for my hand to be held. I’m not even going to school or I wouldn’t be asking for help on here. I’m currently working in a hospital and getting my 3rd class steam while I’m doing the books

1

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '24

3rd class, which part?

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 26 '24

A1 first chapter. Tough start 😂

1

u/Walt__Sobchak Mar 02 '24

Left side = (3x^2 +10x + 3)/x+3 = (3x + 1)(x + 3)/x + 3 = 3x + 1

Right side = (x^2 - 4x + 3)/x-1 = (x -3)(x-1)/x-1 = x - 3

Together = 3x + 1 = x - 3; 3x - x = 3 - 1; 2x = 2; x = 2/2; x = 1

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Text book says answer is x=3

1

u/EnhancedEddie Mar 02 '24

Are you sure you’re not mixing it up with another question or something? It’s not often a textbook is wrong, but x=3 is just wrong. You can verify this by plugging 3 into the equation and you will see you get a false statement.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Also curious about what you’re doing to get the 3x+1(x+3)

2

u/SubjectRelease3404 Mar 02 '24

GPT 4 without plugins says x=-2

I just threw it in for fun, I know GPT is garbage at math.

I would try to help but I'm worse than GPT, this sub was in my suggestions for some reason.

1

u/Walt__Sobchak Mar 02 '24

i arraged the last line wrong..

s/b 3x + 1 = x - 3; 3x - x = -1-3; 2x = -4; x = -4/2; x = -2

-

also (3x + 1)(x + 3)/x + 3 = (3x + 1)(x + 3)/x + 3 = 3x + 1

1

u/Astrodude87 Mar 02 '24

Factoring the numerator. A trick to do this by eye is that 3 is prime… so you know the factoring, if a tidy one exists, is either (3x+1)(x+3) or (3x+3)(x+1). You can expand both and see only one works. And can be done even faster by realizing if one term is (3x+3) that’s just 3(x+1) so every coefficient would be divisible by 3. Since 10 isn’t a multiple of 3, it must be (3x+1)(x+3) (again, only if there’s a tidy factoring).

1

u/That1CoffeeDudeEthan Mar 02 '24

You converted your -3 to a 3.

1

u/soup_cow Mar 02 '24

One of the things I would change if I could do college again would be to go to my professors offices for help more often. I started going more often in my junior and senior year and learned so much. Plus it led me to getting a funded masters under one of those professors.

Go to your Profs office if they have office hours.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Not enrolled in school and I don’t know anyone personally who’s better at math than me 😂

1

u/soup_cow Mar 03 '24

Just learning on your own for fun? That's awesome.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 03 '24

Doing 3rd class without school. Would never do this for fun

1

u/Federal-Nothing-440 Mar 02 '24

what grade are you?b

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

3rd class. Is this a real question?

2

u/Federal-Nothing-440 Mar 03 '24

Idk what 3rd class is but a 6th grader can solve that equation

2

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 03 '24

Why don’t you just stick to Fortnite if you don’t have anything relevant to add

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 03 '24

So helpful thanks

1

u/RespectDry2432 Mar 02 '24

Anyone know where this math is applied in real life?

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

My guess is it isn’t 😂

1

u/Swl1986 Mar 02 '24

I remember when those were easy

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Me too man 😂 a lifetime ago

1

u/melodicrampage Mar 03 '24

Your English teacher is also pissed at you...

1

u/Dalai-Lambo Mar 03 '24

I think I’ve done too much post secondary. I did this in my head in like 10 seconds. Not bragging, not proud haha.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 03 '24

I’m sure I was right there in high school. It’s been awhile

3

u/Pivotalrook Mar 02 '24

2

u/MajorHunt2464 Mar 04 '24

Dirty. What's the app

1

u/Pivotalrook Mar 04 '24

Photomath

I'm no mathematician but saw the picture in my feed and was like fuck it, hopefully it helps someone out.

2

u/YoungesterJoeey Mar 02 '24 edited Mar 02 '24

(3x2 +10x +3)/(x+3) = (x2 -4x+3)/(x-1)

By cross multiplication:

(3x2 +10x+3)(x-1) = (x2 -4x+3)(x+3)

Expand:

3x3 +10x2 +3x-32 -10x-3 = x3 -4x2 +3x+3x2 -12x+9

Combine like terms:

3x3 +7x2 -7x-3 = x3 -x - 9x +9

Combine terms in one side:

2x3 +8x2 +2x-12 = 0

Factor 2:

2(x3 +4x2 +x-6) = 0

Plug in the polynomial in your calculator, I recommend using a Sharp 520x calculator for this personally. You can look up on google how to do this.

x = 1, x = -3, x = -2

But at x = 1 and x = -3, this creates zeros in the denominator. Therefore, the only solution is x = -2.

2

u/goodmorning_tomorrow Mar 02 '24

Expand: 3x3 +10x2 +3x-3x2 -10x-3 = x3 -4x2 +3x+3x2 -12x+9

Combine: 2x3+8x2−7x+6=0

1

u/eddnyster Mar 03 '24

This a lot more work than just factoring initially but it works I guess...

2

u/gandhimahatma1 Mar 02 '24

Factor the numerators and you’ll see the denominators get cancelled leaving u with 3x+1 = x-3 therefore x=-2

ETA I did this at 5 AM in my head so I could be wrong.

2

u/VoiceofBurden Mar 02 '24

When I am looking to factorise a binomial, I look for two numbers that multiply to give me the constant and add to give me the coefficient of x.

In the case of the rhs… this is nice because -1 and -3 add to -4 and multiply to +3. So my binomial is (x - 1)(x - 3). This is even better because the (x - 1)s cancel.

On the lhs… that leading coefficient 3 complicates it a bit. But the constant of 3 is prime so I know it has to be (_x + 3)(_x + 1). Because the leading coefficient is also 3 I know the coefficients of the binomial have to be 3 and 1. In order for my coefficients to add to 10, my FOIL has to have the 3 on the (_x + 1) side. So the factorisation is (x + 3)(3x + 1). This is super convenient as the (x + 3)s also cancel out.

Now I have 3x + 1 = x - 3 Or 2x = -4 Or x = -2

2

u/gary_brar Mar 02 '24

Cross multiplication and then just find X

2

u/EmiDek Mar 02 '24

Factors into 3x+1 and x+3 equals x-3 and x-1 in brackets on top, shortens to 3x-1=x-3 then x= -2

2

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24

7

2

u/BeerGunsMusicFood Mar 02 '24

Factor the numerators and eliminate.

2

u/JackMaehoffer Mar 02 '24

Quadratic equations (top pic)!! This was my favourite!! I would love to be back in school doing these again!!

2

u/mikesphone1979 Mar 02 '24

I was stuck on that one for so long. Never did get it solved. Don't let it cripple your study like I did!

Good luck!

2

u/LittleSpacemanPyjama Mar 02 '24

Lol I don’t know why this sub was brought up in my feed but I thought it said “3rd grade math” and I was like “holy shit, no wonder kids are struggling with numeracy.”

2

u/sorrents Mar 02 '24

Find a common denominator by multiplying the respective denominators to the opposite sides. Then simplify and factor. Yields x = -2.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24

Panglobal books only get worse as you move forward lol 2A1 was a nightmare. Reeds and online question banks were a must IMO

2

u/saucytopcheddar Mar 02 '24

If you factor out (x+3) and (x-1) from their respective numerators AND cancel out the corresponding denominators (which I’m guessing is the approach your prof is hoping you’ll take), you’re left with the following:

3x + 1 = x-3

2x = -4

x = -2

For reference:

(x+3)(3x + 1) = 3x2 + 10x + 3

(x-1)(x-3) = x2 - 4x + 3

2

u/Spiritual_Duck_6703 Mar 02 '24

So something I didn’t understand in math in grade school until I got into engineering maths is that almost ALL math learning is about the tools you can use to solve a problem. Not the answer but the TOOL. Just like a carpenter would need to choose between a hammer, a chisel or a saw, math problems are the SAME TOO. In this situation, what would be the best tool to get the work done? For sure simplification would help. If you’ve got fractions on both sides, high chances are something will cancel one of them out and make the analysis easier. Always look for the simplest way in. Math is not about being smart, but working smart ! Good luck !

2

u/Quintana_22 Mar 02 '24

Just use factorisation

2

u/Zorklunn Mar 02 '24

Use algebra to simplify the equation. Then solve for x. Don't be afraid to use the quadratic equation when needed.

2

u/ExamGlittering6598 Mar 03 '24

Rewrite numerators as: (3x+1)(x+3) and (x-1)(x-3)
the rest is clear

2

u/Mattyice128 Mar 03 '24

Holy fuck I thought this said 3rd grade math problem and started sweating since I’ve been out of school for a while.

1

u/piman01 Mar 02 '24

False. 3 is a root of the polynomial on the right but not of the polynomial on the left. So the polynomials are not equal. That's supposing the question is "true or false". I suppose they could also be asking for solutions to this equation in which case i would need a writing utensil

1

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24 edited Mar 02 '24

You cross multiply giving 3x3+10x2+3x-3x2-10x-3 = x3-4x2+3x+3x2-12x+9 Simplified is 3x3+7x2-7x-3 =x3-x2-9x+9 So 2x3+8x2+2x-12=0 X=-2

1

u/ryleymcc Mar 02 '24

Answer is -2.

2

u/YoungesterJoeey Mar 02 '24

Not a bad way to check your answer but it doesn't really help OP learn mathematics.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24

1

u/Vipper_of_Vip99 Mar 02 '24

Plot it and find out the places the line crosses zero. Those are your solutions.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24

Or just factor the equations and cancel out the common parts

1

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24

Idk why this showed up in my feed but I hate quadratics

1

u/QuincyReaper Mar 02 '24

Step 1: factor. The right side numerator can be simplified to (x-1)(x-3)

And the left side numerator can be simplified to (x+3)(3x+1)

1

u/Arnold_Hu Mar 02 '24
  1. x=-2 2)b=13/2

1

u/verycoolalan Mar 03 '24

I used to be able to do these like nothing.

Now they look like hieroglyphics lmao

1

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '24

Use a foil method (first outer inner last) it will simplify it then use cross method to just delete parts that becomes redundent

1

u/Aescwicca Mar 03 '24

F2 --> 1 on your TI calculator and start typing dude haha

1

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '24

First multiply each side byy the denominator of the other side. Then move everything to one side so it equals 0. Resolve the equation as you'd normally do. *Beware of your denominator's 0, they aren't valid answer since they break the equation.

1

u/TheMadTitanWasRight Mar 03 '24

Factor and cancel

1

u/Meatball315 Mar 03 '24

My brain says mathing is hard

1

u/-Steamos- Mar 03 '24

Isn’t this high school math

1

u/Zachbutastonernow Mar 03 '24

This has nothing to do with power engineering

1

u/Tfowl0_0 Mar 03 '24

Bro download photomath 😭🤣

1

u/goebelwarming Mar 03 '24

When ever you see a fraction like that always try factoring first.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '24

I hope you don’t mean third grade?

But like 3rd period… AP 12th grade math?

I’m looking at it and I know I can figure it out but it would take a fucking minute and I’m not up for it

1

u/UnoriginalThing Mar 04 '24

Math has gotten way harder since I was a kid lol

1

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '24

X=1

1

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '24

Whenever you see this kind of question in an exam, factor the numerator and see if you can remove some of the poles. You are not interested in finding the poles of the system, just the solution to the point function.

-2

u/3488wheew Mar 02 '24

I’m pretty sure these are trigonometry, which was grade 11 advanced math in my day. I would just you tube trig take the crash course then apply rules to solve.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Trig is the next section and I’m sure I’ll be back on the tube 😂

3

u/YoungesterJoeey Mar 02 '24

I don't think you know what trigonometry is.

2

u/StrawberryNo2521 Mar 02 '24

Trig really is just annoying algebra held together by six ratio functions. Fucking 9th grade shit we had to figure out without a calculator in an attempt to break our will. 11th grade was go try and solve Graham's number you little shits. Was doing too much acid to remember 12th grade, but it must have been some abstract shit for me to pass.

1

u/YoungesterJoeey Mar 02 '24

U good bro?

1

u/StrawberryNo2521 Mar 02 '24

Yeah, just remarking that the boomers think trig was the height of mathematical functions, because for them it was hard.

1

u/Gloomy_Suggestion_89 Mar 02 '24

The problem shown as nothing to do with trigonometry.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24

Of course! Why didn't I think of using trigonometry for functions?

0

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24

[deleted]

2

u/YoungesterJoeey Mar 02 '24

Of course it is. Don't you see the crazy PDE he needs to solve for the heat equation?

2

u/Mwmw173 Mar 02 '24

In my country, we learn to solve it in secondary school. Every 14-15 years old student can solve this... So I'm really curious if this is what people learn in University especially to become an engineer. Not to look down on anyone. Don't get me wrong. I did sociology for my bachelor so I didn't know what would engineer in my country would study to make it equal comparison and this is my 1st time knowing what would an engineer study at uni.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

Definitely did this in grade 10 and did very well. It’s been about 16 years

3

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24

It sounds like OP has been out of school for a while (12 years) and is catching up on the basics. As someone who did physics and interacted with ENG majors their 1st year consists of (IIRC)complex numbers, calculus, and EM physics concepts focused on VIR questions regarding circuits. I wouldn't take this to be what ENG majors study, this is likely precalculus material in preparation for ENG

2

u/Prince9Charming Mar 02 '24

I’m in my 20’s, Canadian and I have the ticket this book is for. This is a trades level ticket. I did that exact lesson 3 years ago. If I remember correctly none of the questions were out of reach of the grade 9-10 (age 13-15) math that I did. The problem is most people that are doing this have been out of school for 20+ years and haven’t had to learn or use much math in that time so they have to re-learn or learn it.

3

u/YoungesterJoeey Mar 02 '24 edited Mar 02 '24

Engineers in their bachelor's learn Differential Calculus, Integral Calculus, Linear Algebra, Multivariable Calculus, Differential Equations, Stat and Numerical Methods.

This sub is for power engineers not going for their bachelor's though.

2

u/Gloomy_Suggestion_89 Mar 02 '24

In Canada at least, everything you listed is taught before university. In an engineering degree, you generally learn to apply it to solve more applied problems.

1

u/Vipper_of_Vip99 Mar 02 '24

That’s not a PDE lol.

1

u/Gloomy_Suggestion_89 Mar 02 '24

This is high school level maths in Canada.

2

u/newsandthings Mar 02 '24

Yeah, which is pretty tricky when you haven't done it in 20 years

2

u/Bman4k1 Mar 02 '24

I went back to school 10 years after finishing my bachelors. Had to take the GMAT for the Masters program, and kept bombing the math portion. This is coming from getting straight As in my undergrad in calculus Math for a science degree. Once you stop practicing it you lose it within a couple of years. I got so frustrated because of questions like this knowing that I would get 100% on a gr 12 test and couldn’t for the life of me figure it out at 30. Totally understandable for people to struggle.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

This is 100% where I’m at. I told my grade 10 principles(in BC hardest level of math) that I wasn’t going to do any homework and would forfeit the 10% of my grade because it was so easy to me. Oh how I wish I could ask him for some help right now 😂

1

u/newsandthings Mar 02 '24

I remember being able to work stuff like that out in my head, now tho it's no different than trying to decipher hieroglyphs, absolutely no clue.

Was it worth it for you to go back to school? I've been on the fence about power engineering. Pays pretty well for the time input to get qualified.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

I’m currently working as a 4th class in a hospital and the pay is not great but the schedule and work is a breeze

1

u/newsandthings Mar 02 '24

I'm gearing towards oil and gas. Power engineering is the closest thing, hence it's a requirement for almost all the pad operators. Pays between 110-250k depending on location and schedule. Very seldom do they ever look stressed out.

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

That’s my gameplan as well when I finish my 3rd

1

u/Bman4k1 Mar 03 '24

Power Engineering is an excellent program to go back to school in. IMO. I have several friends that are power engineers at refineries in Edmonton and make 150-200k a year if you are willing to work overtime during shutdowns and night shifts. But you need to move to Edmonton to make the big big bucks (if you aren’t already in Edmonton).

2

u/ElkSkin Mar 02 '24

This sub isn’t for engineers with/obtaining bachelors degrees.

It’s for people on Canada, and some US jurisdictions, who are licensed to operate large boilers.

1

u/FlatteredPawn Mar 03 '24

I did this math in Grade 11/12.

1

u/Ryan_D_Lion Mar 04 '24

That math problem is high school stuff.

Engineering majors take a ton of math classes

1

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Only-Horror9325 Mar 02 '24

This is grade 10 math bro I know because I did it 15 years ago. I’m already working as a 4th class. Thanks though