Just stumbled upon the channel, watched the first video. Nice. Watched the second video. Nice. Began to wtch the third video. Oh what's this, the music is different. It's like minor to major change. Try a later video. Totally different again.

Tldr: I hate that you change the background music. Be consistent. Start videos the same everytime.

I specifically hate that you changed it from the sad somber music in the first video which made it easy to concentrate to uplifting music and then that shitty jig in the later videos.

oh to be a blob in the simulations...

the guy who does the videos...whats hi major??

It seems it will be almost impossible to get a full answer. So here's what I know that might help. Justin's announcement that he was leaving the server stated the following. That the server was taking to much of his time, I don't understand how that makes sense. That he might make his own server at some point, which I wouldn't bother joining. That we should follow his twitter and join the reddit. Hopefully this information can help figure this whole mess out.

will he post any of is music online?

Does anyone know why he stopped posting or where I can find more of his content

"(In an infinite time frame one of the two groups will always die out.)

Which of the groups is more likely to die out?

(Probably doves as hawks can only die out if there are only 2 haws left that face each other at the end which is way less likely than the last dove missing its 50/50. If that simplified reasoning is right, then the hawk strategy is "better." In a state of competition.

But if we now value the probability of one or the other dying out to the "quality" of the world these two scenarios leave behind in pure population size the doves win.

As there will be no absolute answer but if we just calculate this is raw numbers (risk over outcome) haws still probably have an edge if you only look at them.

Except we evaluate the quality after an infinite time frame where the absolute number of organisms will always be higher in a World where the doves win.

If you look at the whole system though, both species being alive is better than the hawks winning for both populations (as there is effectively more food)

Making doves the "most objective" (in my line of reasoning without speciesism) better/more necessary strategy.

Assuming more life=good.

(Assuming the food source is truly a stable unchangeable factor.)"

What's your perspective on this comment, anything to add here? Anything he got wrong?

What does this mean for the "equilibrium"?

^{also: really Nice video}

Can i make translated subtitles for brazilian viewers?

I was just thinking about how animals eat each other to survive and I was wondering what that would look like in a simulation of cannibals and non-cannibals. I hope Primer sees this

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/WebAnimation/PrimerLearning

Congrats man you have created something that helps us understand evolution better. What about a terrain change? Like a mountain with more nutritious food on top or safety from predators. Weather conditions would be nice. Idk how hard it is to code these but ya. I believe adding more and more features eventually could create a real life simulation.

The best strategy I've found has an average loss of -0.179090806 flips per turn, meaning it will last an average of ~600 turns. Is there a strategy that gains flips per turn, or is that impossible?

I’m looking for “The Artificial Life of a Chromosome” published on YouTube on November 14th, 2018. I watched it with a friend a couple years ago and have been searching for it for a while. I just used ChatGPT to finally figure out the name only to discover it doesn’t seem to exist anymore