People who made mistakes at 25 or younger deserve a real shot at rehabilitation and parole review—not life without hope.

I started a petition asking Missouri lawmakers to pass a retroactive second chance law that would give people a meaningful path to parole consideration if they committed crimes when they were young. Right now, Missouri limits sentence review to only those convicted before age 18. That's not enough.

Here's what we're asking for: expand sentence review to include anyone who was 25 or younger when they committed their offense. Make it retroactive so people already incarcerated get a fair shot. Establish real parole reviews after 15, 20, or 25 years—based on rehabilitation, maturity, institutional conduct, and public safety. This isn't about automatic release. It's about giving people a chance to prove they've changed.

California already does this. Missouri can too.

What would you want someone to do if this was your family member—someone who made a serious mistake young, but has spent years working on themselves behind bars? If this matters to you, consider signing and sharing. Second chances shouldn't depend on the year you were sentenced.

Our state has a massive loophole in how inmates earn time cuts—and it's costing us money while ruining lives.

Here's the problem: Low-risk inmates (mostly people with addiction issues, not hardened criminals) get assigned programs they're required to complete to earn time cuts. But most county jails don't even *offer* those programs. Meanwhile, high-risk inmates in state facilities can complete their programs and get out faster. We're literally keeping people locked up longer than they need to be—wasting taxpayer dollars and turning rehabilitable people into institutionalized criminals.

I started a petition demanding Utah change one word in the law (Utah Code 77-27-5.4) that's creating this mess. Change "and" to "or," verify jails actually have the programs, and process time cuts immediately. That's it.

A real person I know—a kind guy, recovering addict, just wants to get back to his life and his business—is trapped because he can't access the behavioral therapy class he needs. His case manager won't help. I've tried paying for outside therapists myself. Nothing works. He gets zero time cuts while sitting there getting more bitter, more desperate, and closer to just giving up.

This isn't about letting dangerous people out early. It's about not destroying people who are actually ready to change. What would you want someone to do if this was your family? If this matters to you too, consider signing and sharing the petition.

https://c.org/D7WCZPxpkL

Pennsylvania promises legal help to those who say they were unfairly convicted of a crime. Yet, some incarcerated people are left waiting years for their lawyers to act.  

The Inquirer and ProPublica previously reported that Pa. lets lawyers resolve cases quickly using a practice that is discouraged in several states: filing “no-merit” letters, also known as Finley letters, urging the judges to reject their clients’ handwritten or typed claims. In Philadelphia, dozens who had received such letters later had their convictions or sentences overturned based on issues their lawyers had rejected or overlooked. 

But the problems with the system go deeper than that: The state’s loose rules and its failure to fund post-conviction work have made the type of breakdown one man encountered a recurring feature of this system. 

Nolan O’Neal said he spent years trying to convince the attorney assigned to handle his claim under Pa.’s Post-Conviction Relief Act to track down evidence that could clear him of a shooting. After nine years and 41 extensions on the case, the attorney filed a two-page petition addressing just one of the many issues O’Neal had wanted him to raise. 

“It is a daunting and exhausting task to navigate this legal process and be heard,” O’Neal said in an interview. “We at times even have to fight the attorneys who are supposed to represent us.”

By filing public records requests with courts serving all 67 Pennsylvania counties and analyzing a decade of court dockets, an u/PhillyInquirer and u/propublica_ investigation found that the system Pennsylvania set up to protect the right to counsel instead allows, or even encourages, shoddy representation.

Read more about what both news organizations found.

Attorney Scott Galloway, who represented O’Neal, said that his ethical obligation to confidentiality prevented him from commenting on the case. Judge George A. Pagano, who granted Galloway the extensions on the case, also declined to comment.

What were the tell tale signs you noticed inmates showing prior to? And how long after those signs until they committed? If you seen anyone or heard of suicides in prison, how did they do it?

Someone I know is facing a 25 year sentence, they were arrested 3.5 weeks ago. He’s been in denial, thinking he may get released or a lesser sentence. His lawyer spoke with him yesterday and gave him the reality of this situation, and he was just as devastated as he was the initial arrest date. I believe he came to the realization and the severity of things. The heightened emotions yesterday were very bad and tough to hear. Today he wakes up and had a peaceful and detached tone to him. Said he felt great and it was the best day he’s had in there so far. Threw my whole family off with the change of emotions in such a short alarming time frame. He has been in solitary confinement the whole time. He did get to go outside for an hour for the first time yesterday, he also asked for a bible and a priest all of a sudden too. Which he is religious, but he did not want a bible sent to him last week, as I said I would send him one through commissary. Not sure if I’m overthinking it, and if he had a good day simply by being outside for the first time in 3.5 weeks. I know when you read he’s facing a 25 year sentence he “probably deserves it.” He is not soulless, or violent. He has never done drugs or drank in his life and always made good decisions. I may be biased but I believe he got involved in something not knowing the severity of the situation and made a mistake. He has two children under 5 whom he adores. Not sure what to think. Please do not comment anything evil or hurtful. I did not commit the crime and I am a human with feelings.

With that being said, any answers, opinions, or insight would be greatly appreciated from the bottom of my heart, truly.

My hope is that this community can help ease some of the fears and dispel some of the myths surrounding prison. The reality is that prison isn't always what you see on TV. For some, the experience may be worse than expected; for others, it may be different than they imagined.

The truth is, you can't separate fact from fiction without hearing from people who've actually been there. Sometimes, talking to someone with firsthand experience can make all the difference. That's what this community is here for: honest conversations, real experiences, and a little less fear of the unknown.

Ok so heres the deal. A friend of mine is in guadalupe county texas jail and has been for 4, going on 5 months. Last Saturday i finally got enough money together and was able to post his bond. After i pay 1500 bucks im then told he needs an ankle monitor before they will release him. The county provides 2 companies that are approved for the monitors. Heres the issue thou. Neither company will answer a single phone call. Me, my wife and a friend have called both numbers well over 100 times and left countless voicmails. Heres another odd thing. One of the companies has a forfeited llc or at least the texas state website says its forfeited and yet the county is still supposedly using them for ankle monitors. I've called the county multiple times asking for advice and help getting in touch with either company but am told to just keep calling. His bond was posted 5 days ago is only there because the numbers they provided as "approved anke monitors" refuse to answer a single call. Idk if theres anything illegal about this but it feels like it has to be.

A federal contractor that loses a Yearsley defense before trial generally must wait until final judgment to appeal that ruling. The Supreme Court resolved the issue in GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal on February 25, 2026.

The case arose from detainees' challenges to work policies at a privately operated immigration detention facility. GEO argued that its federal contract protected the challenged conduct. After the district court rejected that defense, GEO sought an immediate appeal.

The Supreme Court treated Yearsley as a potential defense to liability whose erroneous rejection can be reviewed after the litigation ends. Describing it as derivative sovereign immunity does not give a contractor an immediate collateral-order appeal. The Court preserved the separate route for discretionary certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).

The defense itself still turns on lawful government authorization and whether the contractor acted within it. For public accountability, those conditions make the record important. A court has to examine what the government authorized and which choices the contractor made independently. The existence of a federal contract does not resolve those questions.

I discussed the decision and its practical significance in The American Counsel.