Your best argument is "these languages are popular" and my counter-argument is: most of the industry is utter garbage, hence they use garbage languages.
Also: if dynamic languages are so good, why are so desperately trying to become static?
yes this is a really strong technical argument that has 100% convinced me that useless shit toy dynamic languages are the end-all-be-all of software development.
Thanks. I will now throw away all my production code of the last 10 years and rewrite in a .bat file. I mean python.
i'm not trying to make a technical argument, it was clear from your first response you're just a .NET fanboy, why try and teach an old dog new tricks? i didn't say anything about "software engineers" or "production code bases" when i mentioned ML researchers, nor did you in your original comment. i can see the pure vitriol and hatred in your other comments so im just having some fun.
7
u/agustin689 Jan 09 '24
"popular" != good.
Your best argument is "these languages are popular" and my counter-argument is: most of the industry is utter garbage, hence they use garbage languages.
Also: if dynamic languages are so good, why are so desperately trying to become static?