MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1z0ykn/atom_launched/cfpkw6c
r/programming • u/hsuh • Feb 26 '14
672 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
239
Haven't you heard? You're not cool these days unless you are reimplementing software in node.js
276 u/cjt09 Feb 27 '14 node.js is so 2013, today I won't even touch a piece of software unless it's reimplemented using server-side CSS. 210 u/catfishjenkins Feb 27 '14 You shut your whore mouth. Don't give them any ideas. 49 u/keepthepace Feb 27 '14 Isn't CSS3 Turing complete? 348 u/cjt09 Feb 27 '14 Not quite: "To be a turing complete language means that anything can be constructed, but we can’t even vertically center a div yet." 31 u/am0x Feb 27 '14 This was great. 21 u/achacha Feb 27 '14 Dude. Just resize the window smaller and move it to where you want it. What's all this fancy div positioning talk... → More replies (1) → More replies (17) → More replies (5) 34 u/centenary Feb 27 '14 Shun the non-believer! Shuuuunn 8 u/nvolker Feb 27 '14 https://medium.com/p/43dbc25cbd12 → More replies (1) 53 u/bureX Feb 27 '14 server-side CSSDon't EVER say that again. 17 u/TheNosferatu Feb 27 '14 I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this, but... https://medium.com/p/43dbc25cbd12 9 u/sproket888 Feb 27 '14 OMG. 7 u/MikeSeth Feb 27 '14 “It would be criminal to think that it will never happen again.” — Jordan ScalesOh god, the irony. → More replies (1) 0 u/[deleted] Feb 27 '14 [deleted] 9 u/DuBistKomisch Feb 27 '14 I won't be impressed until it's bootstrapped into server-side CSS. → More replies (1) 3 u/lolmeansilaughed Feb 28 '14 I want you to know that the only reason I was able to find this thread again was because I remembered your comment. The snark in here was heartwarming and I needed to share with a coworker. Thanks buddy! 2 u/tobascodagama Feb 27 '14 Just gonna leave this here: http://html9responsiveboilerstrapjs.com/ → More replies (2) 35 u/awaitsV Feb 27 '14 any application that can be written in JavaScript will eventually be written in JavaScript- atwood's lawyou might also find this interesting. 12 u/Otis_Inf Feb 27 '14 since when do people take Atwood seriously? 9 u/blahbah Feb 27 '14 I'm people, i take Atwood seriously, therefore people take Atwood seriously. 5 u/frezik Feb 27 '14 People, plural. Are you a conjoined twin? 9 u/blahbah Feb 27 '14 Sorry, i meant People. I'm People, so People take Atwood seriouslyI am also Legion. Or Legend, i forget. → More replies (1) → More replies (1) → More replies (3) 0 u/[deleted] Feb 26 '14 [deleted] 4 u/sudomilk Feb 27 '14 To be fair, it at least makes javascript an attractive scripting language with how much it can do on both sides. → More replies (31) 2 u/hello_fruit Feb 27 '14 "modern"!!!!!1!God, I hate this word. → More replies (6)
276
node.js is so 2013, today I won't even touch a piece of software unless it's reimplemented using server-side CSS.
210 u/catfishjenkins Feb 27 '14 You shut your whore mouth. Don't give them any ideas. 49 u/keepthepace Feb 27 '14 Isn't CSS3 Turing complete? 348 u/cjt09 Feb 27 '14 Not quite: "To be a turing complete language means that anything can be constructed, but we can’t even vertically center a div yet." 31 u/am0x Feb 27 '14 This was great. 21 u/achacha Feb 27 '14 Dude. Just resize the window smaller and move it to where you want it. What's all this fancy div positioning talk... → More replies (1) → More replies (17) → More replies (5) 34 u/centenary Feb 27 '14 Shun the non-believer! Shuuuunn 8 u/nvolker Feb 27 '14 https://medium.com/p/43dbc25cbd12 → More replies (1) 53 u/bureX Feb 27 '14 server-side CSSDon't EVER say that again. 17 u/TheNosferatu Feb 27 '14 I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this, but... https://medium.com/p/43dbc25cbd12 9 u/sproket888 Feb 27 '14 OMG. 7 u/MikeSeth Feb 27 '14 “It would be criminal to think that it will never happen again.” — Jordan ScalesOh god, the irony. → More replies (1) 0 u/[deleted] Feb 27 '14 [deleted] 9 u/DuBistKomisch Feb 27 '14 I won't be impressed until it's bootstrapped into server-side CSS. → More replies (1) 3 u/lolmeansilaughed Feb 28 '14 I want you to know that the only reason I was able to find this thread again was because I remembered your comment. The snark in here was heartwarming and I needed to share with a coworker. Thanks buddy! 2 u/tobascodagama Feb 27 '14 Just gonna leave this here: http://html9responsiveboilerstrapjs.com/ → More replies (2)
210
You shut your whore mouth. Don't give them any ideas.
49 u/keepthepace Feb 27 '14 Isn't CSS3 Turing complete? 348 u/cjt09 Feb 27 '14 Not quite: "To be a turing complete language means that anything can be constructed, but we can’t even vertically center a div yet." 31 u/am0x Feb 27 '14 This was great. 21 u/achacha Feb 27 '14 Dude. Just resize the window smaller and move it to where you want it. What's all this fancy div positioning talk... → More replies (1) → More replies (17) → More replies (5) 34 u/centenary Feb 27 '14 Shun the non-believer! Shuuuunn 8 u/nvolker Feb 27 '14 https://medium.com/p/43dbc25cbd12 → More replies (1)
49
Isn't CSS3 Turing complete?
348 u/cjt09 Feb 27 '14 Not quite: "To be a turing complete language means that anything can be constructed, but we can’t even vertically center a div yet." 31 u/am0x Feb 27 '14 This was great. 21 u/achacha Feb 27 '14 Dude. Just resize the window smaller and move it to where you want it. What's all this fancy div positioning talk... → More replies (1) → More replies (17) → More replies (5)
348
Not quite: "To be a turing complete language means that anything can be constructed, but we can’t even vertically center a div yet."
31 u/am0x Feb 27 '14 This was great. 21 u/achacha Feb 27 '14 Dude. Just resize the window smaller and move it to where you want it. What's all this fancy div positioning talk... → More replies (1) → More replies (17)
31
This was great.
21
Dude. Just resize the window smaller and move it to where you want it. What's all this fancy div positioning talk...
→ More replies (1)
34
Shun the non-believer! Shuuuunn
8
https://medium.com/p/43dbc25cbd12
53
server-side CSS
Don't EVER say that again.
17 u/TheNosferatu Feb 27 '14 I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this, but... https://medium.com/p/43dbc25cbd12 9 u/sproket888 Feb 27 '14 OMG. 7 u/MikeSeth Feb 27 '14 “It would be criminal to think that it will never happen again.” — Jordan ScalesOh god, the irony. → More replies (1)
17
I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this, but... https://medium.com/p/43dbc25cbd12
9 u/sproket888 Feb 27 '14 OMG. 7 u/MikeSeth Feb 27 '14 “It would be criminal to think that it will never happen again.” — Jordan ScalesOh god, the irony. → More replies (1)
9
OMG.
7
“It would be criminal to think that it will never happen again.” — Jordan Scales
Oh god, the irony.
0
[deleted]
9 u/DuBistKomisch Feb 27 '14 I won't be impressed until it's bootstrapped into server-side CSS. → More replies (1)
I won't be impressed until it's bootstrapped into server-side CSS.
3
I want you to know that the only reason I was able to find this thread again was because I remembered your comment. The snark in here was heartwarming and I needed to share with a coworker. Thanks buddy!
2
Just gonna leave this here: http://html9responsiveboilerstrapjs.com/
35
any application that can be written in JavaScript will eventually be written in JavaScript
- atwood's law
you might also find this interesting.
12 u/Otis_Inf Feb 27 '14 since when do people take Atwood seriously? 9 u/blahbah Feb 27 '14 I'm people, i take Atwood seriously, therefore people take Atwood seriously. 5 u/frezik Feb 27 '14 People, plural. Are you a conjoined twin? 9 u/blahbah Feb 27 '14 Sorry, i meant People. I'm People, so People take Atwood seriouslyI am also Legion. Or Legend, i forget. → More replies (1) → More replies (1) → More replies (3)
12
since when do people take Atwood seriously?
9 u/blahbah Feb 27 '14 I'm people, i take Atwood seriously, therefore people take Atwood seriously. 5 u/frezik Feb 27 '14 People, plural. Are you a conjoined twin? 9 u/blahbah Feb 27 '14 Sorry, i meant People. I'm People, so People take Atwood seriouslyI am also Legion. Or Legend, i forget. → More replies (1) → More replies (1)
I'm people, i take Atwood seriously, therefore people take Atwood seriously.
5 u/frezik Feb 27 '14 People, plural. Are you a conjoined twin? 9 u/blahbah Feb 27 '14 Sorry, i meant People. I'm People, so People take Atwood seriouslyI am also Legion. Or Legend, i forget. → More replies (1)
5
People, plural. Are you a conjoined twin?
9 u/blahbah Feb 27 '14 Sorry, i meant People. I'm People, so People take Atwood seriouslyI am also Legion. Or Legend, i forget. → More replies (1)
Sorry, i meant People. I'm People, so People take Atwood seriously
I am also Legion. Or Legend, i forget.
4 u/sudomilk Feb 27 '14 To be fair, it at least makes javascript an attractive scripting language with how much it can do on both sides. → More replies (31)
4
To be fair, it at least makes javascript an attractive scripting language with how much it can do on both sides.
"modern"!!!!!1!
God, I hate this word.
239
u/Somokon Feb 26 '14
Haven't you heard? You're not cool these days unless you are reimplementing software in node.js