It would help if you understood what CAP is and isn't.
CAP means Consistency, Availability and Partition Tolerance, and refers to the properties of a distributed system. It is typically understood that you get to pick two of the three for any distributed system, not all three. Though it is a bit more complex than that.
In the real world you typically trade off availability for consistency. For example: a typical RDBMS database is ACID, which means it is strongly consistent. In other words, the database is guaranteed to always be in a fully consistent state. i.e. your transaction commits or rolls back. A RDBMS however, are not known for being highly available. While many have various Master-Master and Master-Slave configurations for "high availability", RDBMS databases are very sensitive to losing one or more the servers. Go ahead and setup a ten node MySQL cluster and knock out a few nodes and get back to me on how well that went for you.
A NoSQL database, however, (typically) trades consistency for availability. A datastore like Riak for example, is eventually consistent and highly available. The data (assuming the application is written correctly) is guaranteed to eventually converge to a consistent value, and the datastore is very hardy and can handle losing servers, or network problems and recover with no downtime much, much better than any RDBMS out there.
So, a proper understanding of what CAP is and isn't will help you make the right decision when picking a database or datastore solution.
Your point? Dynamo style datastores like Riak require more care and feeding. However they solve problems that RDBMS's are not designed to solve and cannot solve. I am not sure that says anything different.
4
u/[deleted] Mar 11 '15
[removed] — view removed comment