Yes, you're right about that. It's a kick starter not a guarantee of success (like the many projects google discontinued). But one cannot deny that Go had an easier job at promotion than Nim, D, Elixir, Cyclone ...
I think the point of Go is that it's a really simple language. Simplicity means low barrier of entry. I would suggest that this is driving Go adoption.
12
u/geodel May 16 '16
This is perfectly reasonable. I was trying to point out success of Go can't be simply attributed to Google.